User talk:Frank0051

Bel-Air, Florida

Hello, and thanks for your note on my talk page about Bel-Air, Florida. I would certainly encourage you to press forward with the Articles for Deletion route, if you feel the place doesn't exist or is not notable. I felt the evidence was such that a proposed deletion without discussion was not justified, but it may well get tossed out after discussion and consensus. --MelanieN (talk) 02:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Federal Reserve Directors updating thanks

Thanks for updating the Federal Reserve directors of the various branches.Smallman12q (talk) 23:40, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

I plan to go through all the Reserve Banks and branches throughout the next couple of days and do updates where needed. Thanks for noticing. Frank0051 (talk) 02:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Not all of the branches have articles yet...I made them when I had first joined wikipedia. You can see some of the missing branches at Federal_Reserve_Branches...they're red links. You're always welcome to create the articles=D. Also...I should take off the "office" part of the name...Smallman12q (talk) 11:49, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

I've also made added the branches to the template: {{Federal Reserve Banks}} so it looks like

Hope this will help.Smallman12q (talk) 12:19, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Florida House of Representatives

Actually there's an edit button on the top left hand corner, I should also let you know your edit was reversed because Oscar Braynon resigned his seat to run for Frederica Wilson's vacant Florida Senate Seat.--Jack Cox (talk) 17:44, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I was going by the Florida House webpage (http://www.flhouse.gov/Sections/Representatives/representatives.aspx). I know about the edit button, haha. But, it isn't just he most user friendly type of thing, especially when you get into long lists and whatnot. Oh well, I guess that's just how Wikipedia is. Frank0051 (talk) 19:49, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Nathan Mayo

Your addition to Nathan Mayo has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Gamaliel (talk) 19:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

It is not copyrighted, see Copyright status of work by the Florida government. Frank0051 (talk) 19:53, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

There appears to be an exemption in Florida statutes for university products. See the Copyright policy of UF and the Copyright statement for the Smathers Library which states "The contents of this web site are the property of the University of Florida and may not be included in any publications (printed or online) without the written permission of the libraries." IANAL, so if you wish to peruse this you might want to consult the Wikimedia General Counsel. Gamaliel (talk) 19:58, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Hmm, well this is new. Let me poke around, I will get back to you on your talk page. Frank0051 (talk) 20:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Oviedo Florida DYK

Hi, I checked this nomination and had to rule it out. Entries for "Did You Know" are limited to articles that have been created from scratch within the last five days, or where the prose portion has been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days. There are more rules at Wikipedia:Did you know#DYK rules, but these two are the main ones. Unfortunately, an interesting fact like the one you found does not qualify. Aymatth2 (talk) 18:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of W.D. Childers

Hello! Your submission of W.D. Childers at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:38, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Keep an eye on Template:Did you know/Queue. As you can see in the chart called "List of DYK Hooks by Date", there are a lot of nominations before it; it might take a few days before it goes into the Prep areas at the bottom of the page. From there, it gets moved up to the Queues. Then you can check in the chart called "Local update times" what time it will appear on the main page in your area. Best, Yoninah (talk) 10:18, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Hey, it's already in Prep 1! Yoninah (talk) 10:24, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for W. D. Childers

Materialscientist (talk) 08:03, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Wow! 2,200 hits on your hook! Good work! Yoninah (talk) 19:05, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 18:37, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Your DYK nom for Master Legend

Hi Frank, I've reviewed your nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Master Legend and I have several issues. Could you please take a look at my comments and reply there? Thanks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:47, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

• Replied there. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:54, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Original Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For updating the tables of directors in the various Federal Reserve Branches articles. Thank you.Smallman12q (talk) 23:44, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

You Rascal You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe6JTHAWDT4 Enjoy! Chrisrus (talk) 04:03, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Master Legend Headshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Master Legend Headshot.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 05:50, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Masterlegend.png

Thanks for uploading File:Masterlegend.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 05:52, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Master Legend

The article Master Legend has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk) 01:41, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Frank0051. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Joseph G. Clemons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph G. Clemons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph G. Clemons until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Proctor photo 1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Proctor photo 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 20:12, 19 May 2019 (UTC)