User talk:RHaworth/2019 Nov 23

Emotional Speech Blocks Deletion Syndrome

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

Speedy deletion of Deleyaman

Dear Roger, I would like to kindly request the undeletion of this Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deleyaman page that has been deleted because of not meeting WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. But I deeply believe that the page and the content meets the Wikipedian criteria proposed to notable artists or bands. This article has been deleted 5 years ago when it was not meeting the abovementioned criteria. However, I have edited and rewritten the article a few months ago by strictly following the requested policies. The reason that it has been placed for speedy deletion just because it has been deleted once 5 years ago, I think, without looking into the new content, that seems to me unreasonable. Hoping for your sincere considering. HovhannesKarapetyan (talk) 06:10, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

• You could try again via AfC. Text emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:43, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

My infobox on my info page

Hi, seems because of an error on my part, I had changed the user tag of my wikipedia user page to a general page. being a newcomer to wikipedia, I didn't know that it had been accidentally done. Could I get to retrieve my data from the page? Thanking you, Riddhidev BISWAS (talk) 13:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

• Restored and then edited. Objections to your state of the page: too much like an article; contained a lot of personal data that you might not wish to publish in such a publick place as Wikipedia and said nothing about what you do here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:43, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Salt request

Can you please creation protect Amin Aminem and block the user? The user has twice now Hijacked other pages and moved them into its place with the intention of trying to avoid scrutiny. Looking through their edits, they seem to be only nonsense edits intended to get edit count up, almost certainly a pure paid editing/promotional COI account. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 23:21, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

• Actioned. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:43, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

D.S.

Hi, please send me the deleted content from Diamond Standard, I may try to clean it up as more references are established. Thank you Nixie9✉ 15:52, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

• Text emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:43, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Christian Science

Hi, re: this edit and similar, the image hasn't been deleted. Are you confusing it with something else? SarahSV ^(talk) 18:56, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

• Why stop at just that Christian Science article? What about this edit and this one? And in fact those three were just part of these 26 edits done by Twinkle in my name. I was doing these 5 harmless deletions and failed to untick a box saying "remove instances". Now all fixed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:14, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the explanation and for fixing everything. SarahSV ^(talk) 22:11, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Why the unnecessary hatred?

Dear Mr.Haworth Why the unnecessary hatred? I have explained the whole of Wikipedia by now that as a rookie, I had unintentionally changed my User page to a common article page. Hope you understand at least this much. Next, Being my only second edit (other than my page) wasn't it a bit too childish and immature of you to bully a teenager on Wikipedia knowing that he is learning about Wikipedia and that those two edits were his only ones? And then reading your edit description, I only hoped that it was a farce, where you pointed out that my modest (by several degrees) Info box was supposedly FAKE? I mean I respect the fact that you are a ruthless destroyer of vandalism and nonsensical articles on Wikipedia, but I still cannot digest why you would be so immature ( at your age and level that is, looking at your photos) that even a personal infobox on a personal user page should be mal treated and vandalised by you? I would hereby, ernestly, even though you do not deserve it, request you to repost all my previous info of my infobox WITHOUT VANDALISING IT! If not, which I hope is unlikely, DELETE my account, thereby admitting the fact that you are nothing but an aggressor, with zero self respect. Be seeing you, Riddhidev BISWAS (talk) 21:32, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

• Instead of waffling, learn how to use an edit history. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:14, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

RHaworth, This is infantile and childish, and to tell you the truth, I've got no time to squander on your baseless suppositions. I know how to use the edit history to recover my Infobox. I also know how to vandalise your user page, but guess what? I am not as immature as you to do so. I even have the sense of self respect to not bow down to your level and mentality to recover and paste my infobox, even though it was you who vandalised it and mocked me later on ( Congratulations!!) Just to reinforce my argument - see this.

Here is my proof. And this is your way of pissing off a person you don't know- I am Riddhidev Biswas. I live in Rouen. So far on Wikipedia I have taken an incredible number of edits just to add HDIs to two articles.

In my opinion, the last time I taunted someone like this was when I was in 10th grade... This is the last time I'm going to respond to anything you type henceforth... Put back my previous info, or delete my account, thereby... you know the rest, don't you? — Riddhidev BISWAS (talk) 17:03, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

• What is preventing you editing User:Riddhidev BISWAS? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

RHaworth, my conscience, Dear Mr. Haworth, and also my healthy narcissistic ego... By logic of damage, you were the one who vandalised it.. so it should be YOU who makes it alright... not me... You had the right to delete the content which was not adhereing to protocol. I apologised, quite humbly too, might I add, for my mistake and then after you put my infobox back, you deleted it and replaced it with an unpleasant user page description which immediately made me dislike you, which I really didn't want to happen... So, my offer still stands... add it or kick me out.. I would do the latter quite pleasantly as that would mean you really like making petty issues akin to molehills into that of huge mountain ranges... Do what you see fit. Riddhidev BISWAS (talk) 21:59, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

• Put your narcissistic ego to one side. This is a simple editorial discussion. You created a user page. I did not like it so I created an alternative version. I did not expect you to like it but I hoped it would give you some clues to what sort of thing I was looking for. So over to you: see if you can create a page that we both agree on. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

I'm confused...

Why exactly did you WP:ECP Amin Aminem under the rationale "has been used for spam"? I see 4 total edits on that page (including yours). None are spam that I can see. Likewise, no other forms of protection have been attempted. This is in direct opposition to WP:ECP: "Extended confirmed protection should not be used as a preemptive measure against disruption that has not yet occurred..." I'm not seeing what you're seeing. — Buffs (talk) 23:43, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

• OK, you cannot see the text of the stuff that has been deleted. But at least, if you bothered to look, you would have seen #Salt request above, made at a time before the redirect was created. And this report should give you an idea of what has been happening. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:14, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

"if you had bothered to look" Dude, I had exactly zero idea where to look. You don't need to be so condescending. You were vague. A simple explanation would have been sufficient. Buffs (talk) 15:19, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

• Buffs, you need to learn all the useful tools available: at the top of each article's edit history is a link "view logs for this page", on the left there are "what links here" and "related changes links". — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Nothing in the visible history of this page mentions anything about "spam". And I see nothing other logs that fits the criteria of "spam", IMHO. Instead of taking feedback as a personal affront warranting a strong hostile/defensive response, perhaps you could be a little more civil, assume I mean well, and take it as a chance to explain things better in the future. Buffs (talk) 17:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

• Buffs, I claim that, in my boorish way, I am trying to improve your Wikipedia experience. "Nothing in Special:WhatLinksHere"! For goodness sake - surely a link to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amin Aminem is a clear indication. Did you follow that link? And surely the log report is a clear indication that protection might be a good idea. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:50, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

None of those links mention spam. And, yes, we'll agree on "boorish" as an apt description. Buffs (talk) 17:24, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

• (talk page watcher)@RHaworth: Is there any reason for the redirect at Amin Aminem to exist? There seems no mention of this name in the target article Drishyam. I'd have taken it to WP:RfD but as you've protected it I thought I'd ask here. — PamD 13:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

This is perplexing. Why reprotect creation of the article? It was already in place; you just repeated it? Buffs (talk) 17:28, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

• Buffs, no: the protection I applied at 2019 Nov 04 16:41:07 was edit protection. This cancelled the previous create protection. If create protection had been in force on Nov 08, an attempt to re-apply it would have received a null response. But can I take it that you now accept that protection of this title is valid?

PamD, I agree: the redirect should not exist. Amin added his name with this edit but it was soon removed. In any case a redirect from an actor's name to one of their appearances is rarely justifiable.

Out of interest, I checked what IMDb has about the guy - self-writtten, listing six movies and in every case he is listed in "rest of cast", ie. not credited. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:34, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy of Draft:SP Chauhan

Dear RHaworth, I request you kindly for the undeletion of this Wikipedia: Articles for deletion/Draft: SP Chauhan page that has been deleted because of not meeting (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion). But I deeply believe that the page was not created for promotion, It was created for social awareness. This article has been deleted on the 4 November 2019 As it was not meeting the abovementioned criteria. I have read carefully what went wrong on the page so if you can undelete the page I will definitely make you believe that the article was not for any kind of promotion or advertising. Hoping for your sincere considering, Mukularora04 (talk) 05:50, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

• I think GPL93 saw those horrible mal-formed links and thought "this is someone who just wants to promote a person - they cannot be bothered to learn any Wikipedia standards". Restored. Whip it into shape. GPL93, please allow it to be reviewed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:14, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

@Mukularora04: that and the fact that the Draft was, and still is, chock full of WP:PEACOCK phrases (ex: "SP Chauhan, who is now one of the most famous personalities of Haryana"). All Wikipedia articles must adhere to a neutral point of view, and the draft currently does not. Best, GPL93 (talk) 12:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Arthur McGill (surgeon)

Hi...In error, I created a duplicate Arthur McGill (surgeon) of Arthur Fergusson McGill. Are you able to remove this. They are both the same. Sorry and thank you. Whispyhistory (talk) 17:19, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you RHaworth..I think I need to slow down. I am really sorry to have had to bother you. Whispyhistory (talk) 20:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

• It is nice to keep in touch but remember that you could have got rid of the page by slapping {{db-author}} at the top. Also this is a useful edit that you could have done. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

I didn't know that first point...but should have thought of the second. Thank you. Whispyhistory (talk) 15:19, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Restoration of Grace Ihejiamaizu Draft

Hi RHaworth, Please check my conversation with Athaenera https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Athaenara#Grace_Ihejiamaizu Another experienced reviewer approved this draft and changed the terms (funny enough I did think that the terms used where kinda self promoting -- the history of the page can still be seen), but I think she may have been a bit biased because she was a fellow woman since everyone else thinks that the page is self-promoting. I always open another page side by side when writing articles so as to be neutral as possible when writing. And I'm keen on getting this right. — Opatachibueze (talk) 08:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

• If you are keen on getting things right, then learn to always provide wikilinks, eg.: User talk:Athaenara#Grace Ihejiamaizu and Grace Ihejiamaizu or, even better, Grace Ihejiamaizu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), Draft:Grace Ihejiamaizu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:50, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Copy of Deleted Draft:GraphBLAS Page

Hello RHaworth, My colleagues and I were working together to create the Draft:GraphBLAS page, which you recently deleted. Could we please have a copy of the page prior to deletion? Additionally, if you could provide any more feedback than G11, we would greatly appreciate it. We really think that GraphBLAS qualifies for inclusion in Wikipedia, but we certainly don't want the article to sound like an advertisement. Thank you in advance for your help! — ScottKolo (talk) 16:58, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello RHaworth,

I'd like to add to ScottKolo's question about Draft:GraphBLAS with some information, the GraphBLAS API is not a commercial product, it is an API specification in the same vein as Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms. While I wrote the page, my only affiliation with it is that I wrote an open-source Python wrapper around the API which I have disclosed correctly. The page that was deleted contained only a description of the purpose of the API and the key linear algebraic mechanism that it uses. No commercial products were mentioned and all outgoing links are to open source implementations and tools and research papers related to the API. I agree the wording of the page could be more encyclopedic but prompt deletion seems a bit harsh given that the spirit of the page does not seem violate G11.

Thanks for any light you can shed on the matter, several of us community volunteers are ready to rewrite the page however we need to, but we are a bit puzzled exactly what was wrong with it, and since it was tagged and deleted in only a few hours time we have had no opportunity to understand why or even archive a copy of it for our own review. — Pelletier.michel (talk) 19:15, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

• It may seem simplistick but when I see <h1> headings in an article, I automatickally assume "spammer who has no interest in learning wiki standards". You compare your product with BLAS but made no attempt to show that it is equally notable. Text emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:50, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you so much! We'll take more time to make sure it's both up to wiki standards and demonstrates notability. ScottKolo (talk) 13:23, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Harris hawks

Restoration of deleted page Harris hawks optimization or send me the source WIKI code or text of page. Hi, with best regards I am the developer of the algorithm and related webpage, please restore, I will rewrite the last part, which used "rapid" word, the rest of the page was about equations and algorithm. If there is no way, please send me the code of pages (with a lots of equations) or text of the page. — Aliasghar68 (talk) 21:38, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

• Always log in before editing. Text emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:50, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

White Palace (Dhamdacha)

I saw that you dealt with a recent article creation by a different person. User:Whitepalacegujrat <-> White Palace Dhamdachha. Can I leave it with you? — billinghurst sDrewth 09:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

• Always provide a link when you talk about any page. What action were you hoping I would take? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:50, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of Wamp.NET and TinyRouter

Hi, You've deleted Wamp.NET and TinyRouter for apparent copyright issues but they are my sites? The only reason they have a wikipedia entry at all is because the category page they were on requires it. How can I get this restored please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidbuchweitz (talk • contribs) 16:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

• Preferably you will wait until someone who has no CoI thinks that your software is notable and writes about it here. If you insist on trying to spam us, at the bottom of wamp.net replace "all rights reserved" with a {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} tag. Similarly for Tiny Router. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:34, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Could I please ask that you restore the entries and remove any content that you feel is not suitable? Davidbuchweitz (talk) 17:59, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

• Do you really expect me to do your editing for you? Text emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:29, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Do you know that nearly all the sites listed on List of AMP packages and List of router and firewall distributions have "all rights reserved" on their website front page? I don't understand why you're telling me to change mine? You've removed a page that nobody else had a problem with for almost 3 years. Davidbuchweitz (talk) 18:53, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

• As Frood has told you, if you wish to be idle and use the text from your websites, then they must have a Creative Commons licence. If completely different text is submitted here, preferably by someone with no CoI, then clearly you do not need to change your websites. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of User:Aryakin2006/sandbox

Why did you delete that page? G2 does not apply to sandboxes or userspace pages (this one was both!), and even disregarding that, I didn't see anything on it harmful enough to warrant speedy deletion. Geolodus (talk) 11:22, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

• Sorry, yes, G2 was inappropriate. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:34, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Nicolas Chaillan's page

Sir, Page: [[1]] Thank you for reviewing the Nicolas M. Chaillan's page. As requested, I have added several references, including SEVERAL large articles and even one where is he on the COVER of the magazine for both Business Chief and Giganit. Dozens of interviews are available in various videos are on YouTube as well. I simply picked a couple which should be more than enough but I can add more if needed. The cover FYI is here: https://issuu.com/businessreviewusa/docs/bc_usa_oct2019 — Again there are more references available but I believe this is plenty. — There are dozens more on Google but this is more than I have ever seen on Wikipedia. At this point, saying he isn't notable is insulting our military and the U.S Government. I'm hoping there is no bias here from foreigners against U.S government officials. Can you please let me know what else is needed? Again, a simple google of his name will bring dozens of results and articles. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanbernard2019 (talk • contribs) 01:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

• I have not reviewed the page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Recover The Nut-Free Factory

Could you please recover The Nut-Free Factory? I need it for my business. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobloxCount999 (talk • contribs) 15:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

• Why do you bracket links with <nowiki></nowiki>? Please reply. "I need it for my business" - at least you are honest in your spamming. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your restaurant is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)