Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 28

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Categories for discussion‎ | Log

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Fayenatic london (talk | contribs) at 11:51, 9 February 2024 (→‎Secularists: Category:Turkish secularists was also reinstated on the same grounds as requested by {{u|Aybeg}} at User_talk:Marcocapelle#Secularists. ~~~~). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
< January 27
January 29 >

January 28[edit]

Category:Michigan Women's Hall of Fame inductees[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:OCAWARD User:Namiba 23:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 21:44, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Motorsport photographers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one category layer. Omnis Scientia (talk) 22:20, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Categroy:Art museums and galleries in Armenia by city[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:NARROWCAT. Only 1 sub-cat each. Merge for now. –Aidan721 (talk) 20:27, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge for now, only one subcategory each. No objection to recreate the categories when multiple city categories can decently be populated. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sportspeople from London by locality[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 5#Category:Sportspeople from London by locality

Category:People of the Scientific Revolution[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 5#Category:People of the Scientific Revolution

Category:Actors from London by locality[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 5#Category:Actors from London by locality

Secularists[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: manual merge/rename/delete. Keep Category:Israeli secularists. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 15:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Post-closure note: Category:Turkish secularists was also reinstated on the same grounds as requested by Aybeg at User_talk:Marcocapelle#Secularists. – Fayenatic London 11:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge the two trees, the difference between "secularists" and "critics of religions" is not clear enough to keep them as separate trees. Conceptually there is a difference, but when reading individual biographies it becomes very blurry. On the other hand, purge subcategories of politicians by political party, Category:Secular Jews and Category:Cultural Muslims. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom Mason (talk) 06:19, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Comments on Place Clichy's nomination?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Qwerfjkl: My comments were in fact not as drastic as they seem. I believe we have reached consensus on sth like: Delete Category:Arab secularists, merge/rename the others as nominated, which already includes purging political parties. So I'm not sure the relisting is absolutely necessary. @Marcocapelle and Smasongarrison: may confirm or disconfirm. Place Clichy (talk) 10:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I know, I'd just like to see if anyone has any further comments; I prefer to err on the side of safety. If no one else comments then I'll close in favour of your suggestion. Qwerfjkltalk 17:04, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Sounds good to me :) Mason (talk) 22:46, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, at least for the Israeli category. In Israel "secularist" is largely used to refer to politicians who stand for the separation of synagogue and state (and most of the people in the category are politicians whose party has secularism as a policy). This is quite different to being a "critic of religion". Renaming the Israeli category would be particularly absurd given some of the people in the category tree are active practicers of religion, including a few rabbis. Number 57 14:02, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Art museums and galleries in Douala[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:NARROWCAT. Merge for now until it can be sufficiently populated. –Aidan721 (talk) 20:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge for now without objection to recreate the categories when they can be populated better. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional parasites and parasitoids[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Fictional parasite characters. Because species members would no longer belong in the category, they will be added to a species category instead. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 15:17, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category was being confused for being a species category rather than one about individual characters who are parasites. There could be a complementary Category:Fictional parasitic species and races category, but I'm not sure there are enough of them to justify it. Either way, the species should be purged and recategorized to Category:Fictional species and races. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alternate rename to Category:Fictional parasites. There's no reason why this should be restricted only to individual characters, especially because parasites/parasitoids are biological terms applied to various species of animals, creatures and organisms. AHI-3000 (talk) 19:01, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rename per nom I don't see any real distinction here. Parasitoids are parasites who eventually kill their host. Their strategy is different to other parasites, but they are still parasites. Dimadick (talk) 08:59, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 23:46, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rename per nom, but also split out the species to Category:Fictional parasites, parallelling Category:Fictional plants. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The entire point is that "Fictional parasites" makes it unclear whether it's a species or an individual, leading to a redux of what happened with this category. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Zxcvbnm: Why does it need to be separated between species or individuals? Despite what you think, character categories can be inclusive of both groups and individuals. Besides, the term "parasite" is more often used to describe entire species of parasitic creatures, rather than individual organisms who happen to be parasites. And if this category is to be renamed, Category:Fictional parasites is the better alternative to both Category:Fictional parasitic characters and Category:Fictional parasites and parasitoids. AHI-3000 (talk) 21:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Because that's how it is for every other similar category, it retains consistency. It would also be misleading to categorize individuals under species, and vice versa. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:44, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I don't think there is a practical need to split out species from characters into different categories. One category containing both seems fine as a navigational tool.4meter4 (talk) 17:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rename per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 22:22, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Assassinated politicians by political orientation[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 5#Category:Assassinated politicians by political orientation

Category:Romanian coroners[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Not enough people to warrant diffusion. The few people in each category is already in another nationality category (such as Category:20th-century Nigerian lawyers,e tc). Mason (talk) 17:23, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge for now without objection to recreate the categories when they can be populated better. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:12, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Coroners of New York County, New York[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 5#Category:Coroners of New York County, New York

Category:Slavery in Chile[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Slavery in South America. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:30, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Dual upmerge for now. There's only one category in here, which is unhelpful for navigation Mason (talk) 17:18, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Turner Sports[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Also could be a broad rename to simply TNT Sports. Turner Sports has been rebranded twice, most recently to TNT Sports. Esolo5002 (talk) 16:37, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rename; this could have been speedied per WP:C2D. Omnis Scientia (talk) 17:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Cinephiles[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining and overly broad. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 14:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom Mason (talk) 17:19, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, most articles are about people working in the film industry. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:18, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Too subjective a label to be a workable category. Occupations like director (as are most current members of the category) or film critic are more precise. Place Clichy (talk) 11:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:9th-century zoologists[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. One a handful of pages in here, which is not enough to diffuse by century. Mason (talk) 06:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional counterterrorism organizations[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: disperse. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 15:21, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only has two articles that aren't redirects, too small to be realistically needed as a subcategory. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:10, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not all counterterrorism organizations are military (e.g., CTU is not). Apokrif (talk) 13:37, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking the redirects would just be removed unless they became an article. These categories are not redirect dumping grounds for every little mention of a fictional organization somewhere. If not they can be diffused accordingly. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, if only because counter-terrorist organizations are not necessarily all military, some can be civilian law enforcement agencies instead. AHI-3000 (talk) 19:08, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disperse among the three fictional parent categories, per nom. That resolves the issue that not all counterterrorism organizations are military. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:37, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 22:07, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, QueenofHearts 04:27, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disperse per Marcocapelle. As terrorist is a rather subjective notion, so is counter-terrorist, even in the world of fiction. Place Clichy (talk) 11:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional alien hunters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Fictional monster hunters. Being interesting is not the purpose of categories. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 15:24, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: None of the characters in here would be typically defined as an "alien hunter" first and foremost. (i.e. Samus is simply a bounty hunter, for humans or aliens alike. Agent J and K are government agents). Nor is there an actual article on the topic. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:32, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose AHI-3000 (talk) 22:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. There's no reason to distinguish by type of monster hunted given the size of the category. If the population grows, then it can be recreated Mason (talk) 22:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Would those advocating deletion be amenable to merging to Category:Fictional monster hunters, as Marco suggested?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 21:17, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, a good science-fiction category, seems it would be of interest to anyone who actually clicks on it. I'll probably look at it and click on a few (thanks to the category's creator, whomever that may be will give them a 'thanks'-button click). Randy Kryn (talk) 11:35, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Keep for these same reasons AHI-3000 (talk) 23:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC) Duplicate vote. QueenofHearts 04:22, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, QueenofHearts 04:22, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge to Category:Fictional monster hunters per Marcocapelle. Also support deletion per nom as second-best outcome, in the spirit of consensus. It is actually unlikely, even for fictional characters, that they would confront only aliens. Mulder and Scully are typical examples of that: that's something they did, not what they are. IIRC, even Ellen Ripley fights more often human or droid foes than the Xenomorph. Probably only the MIB would be so specialized, although Agent J is notable for his career in law enforcement hunting petty criminals. Also, hunter is kinda restrictive: there are no aliens (and therefore no alien hunters) in fictional settings where everyone or almost is an alien, such as Star Wars and Star Trek, and humans fighting an alien military invasion (Independence Day, Mars Attacks, The Tomorrow War, Starship Troopers, V etc.) aren't really hunters. Place Clichy (talk) 11:41, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional zombie hunters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Fictional monster hunters. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 15:35, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The nature of this category is somewhat flummoxing, as I don't know if any of the characters here could be called "zombie hunters". Usually, zombies are hunting THEM and they're trying to do some unrelated task that might stop the zombies somehow. The idea that someone might be a "zombie hunter" is not backed up by sources. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose AHI-3000 (talk) 22:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. There's no reason to distinguish by type of monster hunted given the size of the category. If the population grows, then it can be recreated Mason (talk) 22:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are quite a few video games characters among them who may actually hunt zombies. Maybe purge first? Marcocapelle (talk) 07:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    As I said, it's one thing to kill zombies as part of a job, it's another thing to hunt them. I'm not sure which of these specifically hunts individual zombies, but it's certainly not enough for a category. If necessary they can be moved to Category:Fictional monster hunters. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strongest possible keep. Lots of entries to form a delightful and enriching category... and merging to "monster hunters"? Don't think zombies qualify as monsters, they're simply undead humans, typically exposed to a horrible virus ... as for the assertion that the "zombies" are hunting them", you clearly haven't met sensai Michonne or stryker crossbow virtuoso Daryl Dixon -- they be doing the hunting, Fo'Sho'). Cbl62 (talk) 20:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    History.com, at least, refers to zombies as monsters. Category:Zombies and revenants in popular culture is also categorized under Category:Fiction about monsters. Category:Zombies is also categorized under monsters. Even if there are a few legitimate zombie hunters there, it can easily be classified under the category of monster hunters. Still, given the fact that zombies tend to chase after any human around, "zombie slayer" strikes me as more accurate a description, as they hardly need to be hunted down. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    This comment is like fandom. Also, plenty of monsters are humans or humanoids, such as the ogre figure in classical tales, or werewolves. In fact, most probably are. Monsters is a fine merge target. Place Clichy (talk) 11:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Keep per Cbl62 AHI-3000 (talk) 23:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC) Duplicate vote. QueenofHearts 04:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: "Fictional zombie hunters" implies that there are counterpart zombie hunters in real life. Is that the case? --Paul_012 (talk) 07:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There are real-life UFO hunters, Nessie hunters and maybe vampire hunters, so among other popular lore creatures I wouldn't be surprised if there were werewolf hunters or zombie hunters. Would it only be for the sake of skepticism and rationality. Place Clichy (talk) 11:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 21:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, QueenofHearts 04:22, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1st-century economic history[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:30, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, isolated subcategory, the next one is for the 6th century. No need to merge, the only article is already in Category:33 and Category:Economy of ancient Rome. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:22, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 15:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 07:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Valuable for navigation across time periods. Has potential for growth. Better to preserve the category structure. This is exactly the type of nomination that made WP:SMALLCAT deprecated because it is a bad outcome to delete this type of category.4meter4 (talk) 05:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, QueenofHearts 04:12, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from the Federal Capital Territory (Nigeria) by occupation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. This category only has one page in it, which is unhelpful for navigation Mason (talk) 01:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_January_28&oldid=1205332965"