Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 5

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion‎ | Log

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nabla (talk | contribs) at 22:47, 21 January 2024 (→‎Eventualism: redirect, or delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

January 5

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 5, 2024.

Sir William Parker(1781-1866)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 09:20, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Sir William Parker (1781-1866), does not exist, and neither do Sir William Parker(1781–1866) or Sir William Parker (1781–1866) (using an en dash instead of a hyphen, which is preferred for year ranges). Steel1943 (talk) 22:44, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hurricane Fausto(2002)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 09:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Hurricane Fausto (2002), is the target of the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 22:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Typhoon Vera(1986)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 09:16, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Typhoon Vera (1986), is the target of the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 22:40, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Typhoon Viola(1966)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 09:11, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Typhoon Viola (1966), is a redirect that targets the same target as the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 22:37, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

HSBC Arena

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:23, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate. KeyBank Center (HSBC Arena from 2000-2011) is a very likely target. 162 etc. (talk) 22:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate - in the meantime, the inbound links need to cleaned up, seems like an even split between the Buffalo and Rio arenas. igordebraga ≠ 01:54, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate the Wikipedia article for KeyBank Center is the 1st result on Google. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Drafted dab at the redirect. Jay 💬 09:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Vishwarubam(2010 film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 08:53, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Vishwarubam (2010 film), currently does not exist, though a page at that title that was deleted in 2010. But then again, neither do Vishwarubam (film) or heck even Vishwarubam. And the target of the nominated redirect is neither about a film nor a disambiguation page with subjects by this specific name/spelling. The edit history of the nominated redirect does not make it clear why the redirect was created. Steel1943 (talk) 22:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete due to malformed modifier --Lenticel (talk) 01:00, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:RDAB. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 14:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete seems ridiculous even when the base name doesn't exist to have a 2nd qualifier with a malformatted title, although its existed since 2010 its always been a redirect. If a valid article can be created it can be created at the base name. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

In the Shadow of the Eagles(1966)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 08:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, In the Shadow of the Eagles (1966), currently does not exist. Steel1943 (talk) 22:24, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bonnaroo Music Festival(2002)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 08:49, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Bonnaroo Music Festival (2002), is a redirect that targets the same target as the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 22:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Zoo Tycoon(2001 video game)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 08:48, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Zoo Tycoon (2001 video game), is the target of the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 22:16, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Forbidden Door

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should be retargeted per WP:ASTONISH; most article viewers are likely looking for either the the concept in professional wrestling or the series of wrestling pay-per-views named after it; see pageviews over the past two years (with specific attention to the noticeable spikes corresponding to June 27, 2022 and June 26, 2023). Sceptre (talk) 21:07, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Overview of The Windsor Lines

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect, previously deleted article recreated again - no links to redirect other than from previous AfD/XfDs. User who created this appeared to be creating previously deleted redirects, which is rather concerning Nightfury 20:53, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, the Windsor lines are a physical structure, in three sections: (i) the northernmost four tracks of the eight-track route between Waterloo and Clapham Junction; (ii) the four-track route between Clapham Junction and Barnes; (iii) the two-track route between Staines and Windsor & Eton Riverside. These date back many decades before South Western Railway was created. --Redrose64 🦌 (talk) 23:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Feeling It Too

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 14:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not helpful to redirect to a target that has no mention of the subject in question. These redirects do imply that these songs charted, so they may be notable per WP:NSONG. Deletion to encourage article creation may be desirable. -- Tavix (talk) 21:24, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. There is a mention at List of performances on Top of the Pops, but no other details. Jay 💬 14:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Multiply Records#53 (though in this instance were the Top of the Pops mention the only one I would !vote to retarget there – it's a common multi-word phrase which renders search results unreadable; the mention is easy to find, being right at the top of a section; and a decent chunk of the time all the reader searching up the song title wants to know is one detail, and we give them two, the year and the band). J947 ‡ edits 20:09, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 20:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I think it's more helpful to have a redlink to encourage article creation than it is to redirect to a mention in a list. Although I like the suggestion of retargeting to Multiply Records#53, I think the user experience of being redirected to a row in a table isn't very smooth or easy on the eyes. - Whisperjanes (talk) 01:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Steel1943 (talk) 01:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Eternity (Orion song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 15:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not helpful to redirect to a target that has no mention of the subject in question. These redirects do imply that these songs charted, so they may be notable per WP:NSONG. Deletion to encourage article creation may be desirable. -- Tavix (talk) 21:24, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 19:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Area code 543

The area code in question is not mentioned on the target page. Area code 542, Area code 545, Area code 546, and Area code 547 do not exist, and the page List of North American Numbering Plan area codes lists these and 543 as "not in use" codes. 543 is the only one of the 500s "not in use" area codes other than 555 due to its significance to have a redirect. In that case I believe this redirect should be deleted. 1033Forest (talk) 05:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • To be honest, I had forgotten about this item. I created it in 2008 and had not touched it since. I suspect what it was for was a planned area code that had not been assigned, so it was made a redirect to the general list of unassigned area codes until it was assigned, and someone looking for it would be sent to the unassigned page, as opposed to being dumped to Wikipedia's equivalent of a 404 page and, not seeing a mention of that area code as proposed to be used in the future figure the reference was completely wrong, not premature. My thoughts are that Wikipedia is supposed to be comprehesive, and I think having a page for a not-yet-in-use area code redirect to a page on future area codes is more appropriate than landing on the default 'no entry here" page.

    "Understanding of things by me is only made possible by viewers (of my comments) like you."

    Thank you.
    Paul Robinson Rfc1394 (talk) 21:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • This NPA has been reserved for non-geographic services. Similar NPAs redirect to Personal communications service (NANP) when created. They have a way to go, since they opened 533 this year. Delete and recreate as a redirect to the aforementioned title at such time when this NPA is opened for assignment. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not mentioned anywhere relevant. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:38, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Personal communications service (NANP) where it's mentioned that the area code is reserved for that purpose. -- Tavix (talk) 14:26, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the talk of the current and proposed targets.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 16:45, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadette (Merry Christmas, and a happy new year) 18:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cobee Bryant

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 10:43, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We seem to be redirecting readers to the wrong sportsman. Mentions seem to be about Cobee Bryant, who has no article. Deletion might serve readers better. Certes (talk) 16:33, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadette (Merry Christmas, and a happy new year) 18:09, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Treaty of Vasai(1802)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:09, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Treaty of Vasai (1802), is a redirect that targets the same target as the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 16:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Socket F(1207)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:06, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Socket F (1207), currently does not exist and probably does not need to exist. The "1207" is in regards to the amount of pins the target article's subject, which is a CPU socket (see Category:CPU sockets), has; similar articles I have found do not have similar redirects targeting them. Steel1943 (talk) 16:15, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

United States Senators by seniority(1979)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 16:04, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, United States Senators by seniority (1979), is a redirect that targets the same target as the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 16:03, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Komagata Maru(2010 film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 16:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Komagata Maru (2010 film), currently does not exist though the related Komagata Maru (film) does exist and targets the same target as the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 15:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete it was at this title for about a quarter of an hour in 2010 and the page is not in userspace so deleting doesn't seem a problem anyway as the content with respect to link rot isn't even in mainspace. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:48, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:RDAB. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 14:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as malformed modifier --Lenticel (talk) 00:57, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Typhoon Vera(1977)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 15:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Typhoon Vera (1977), is a redirect that targets the same target as the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 15:56, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Eventualism

Delete, unless there is an appropriate local target for this page (which there does not appear to be). The plain {{soft redirect}} template is not used in the mainspace (along the lines of the sentiment expressed at WP:SOFTSP). See also this deletion discussion; if this is deemed worthy to exist as is, then that template will need to be restored. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 08:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Notifying Randy Kryn, who retargeted the redirect, it having used to point to Schizopolis. J947 ‡ edits 09:11, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the ping. Why not just copy the Meta article meta:Eventualism to Wikipedia: Eventualism? It is a very good page about Wikipedians, has been around since September 2003, and seems like it would fit well here and is already a recognized and well-stocked category (Category:Eventualist Wikipedians). I learned about the term from Econterms, who may have a learned opinion on this topic. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This term should point somewhere into the actual encyclopedia, not as a cross-namespace or cross-wiki redirect. The only mainspace content it has ever pointed to is Schizopolis, which is clearly not the primary topic, and the article in the history would clearly not survive AfD and could arguably be A7-ed so has no need to be restored. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:41, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it's a given that it has to be changed Pppery. What do you think about the idea of bringing the article at the Meta link to Wikipedia WP space and making this a WP link? Is that easily done and allowable with a copy paste along with due credit? I don't think it would get much objection. As for mainspace, any good ideas for an alternate? Randy Kryn (talk) 05:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The pre-redirect content cannot be deleted under A7 as it was about a plot element in a film, which is not one of the categories of article that criterion covers. A1 speedy deletion was previously correctly declined and none of the other criteria are relevant. Deletion is not guaranteed at AfD either, given that merging into Schizopolis should be considered. Thryduulf (talk) 11:53, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete it seems to be a philosophical and an artistic concept according to my Google Book search. It's probably better off as a red link until someone more competent in those fields make an article out of it. Alternatively, Weak retarget to Deletionism_and_inclusionism_in_Wikipedia#Scholarly_research were the term is mentioned. --Lenticel (talk) 08:35, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment wikt:eventualism exists, and also has a see-also to wikt:longtermism, which in turn links to our longtermism article. I like Lenticel's retargetting suggestion but I'm also tempted by the redlink to encourage creation about the philosophy - however, I'm not certain that it is a single philosophy but rather a broad concept that exists as part of multiple philosophies. Thryduulf (talk) 11:57, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the talk of a proposed target Deletionism and inclusionism in Wikipedia.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 14:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You Give Love

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 14:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect dead end, no mention of whatever it is at the target page, a repoint to 'You Give Love a Bad Name' could be a possibility, but I'd say no, that song would be found easier with this redirect gone. Richhoncho (talk) 13:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Color symmetry

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 21#Color symmetry

Situla(vessel)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 14:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing is at Situla (vessel). Gonnym (talk) 11:55, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tropical Storm Verna(1945)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 14:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing is at Tropical Storm Verna (1945). Gonnym (talk) 11:54, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pax Soprana(The Sopranos episode)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 14:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing is at Pax Soprana (The Sopranos episode). Gonnym (talk) 11:53, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Disgaea(anime)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 14:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing is at Disgaea (anime). Gonnym (talk) 11:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tropical Storm Vera(1989)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 14:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing is at Tropical Storm Vera (1989). Gonnym (talk) 11:51, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Seed Money

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 20#Seed Money

Kotaro Fuuma(World Heroes Character)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 14:13, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing is at Kotaro Fuuma (World Heroes character). Gonnym (talk) 11:49, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Moscow Drama Theatre

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 14:13, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For deletion. It’s not even that the ‘drama theatre’ redirects to an opera house. It’s that there are lots of drama theatres in Moscow. And most, if not all of them, have ‘Moscow Drama Theatre’ as part of their official or most common, descriptive name. (Full name would then be like Yermolova Moscow Drama Theatre, Pushkin Moscow Drama Theatre and so on.) Unless someone reworks this page into a proper WP:D all it will do is confuse editors into linking it like this (the creator of the redirect in question made this edit, not realising that Moscow Drama Theatre under the direction of Armen Jigarkhanyan is all the name of the mentioned troupe. Yeah Russian theatre companies do tend to grow horribly long and hard to handle names for some reason. You don’t see these long names in this category because it’s in English, but direct translations from Russian sources would often have references worded like that. Vondalzolez (talk) 11:45, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Danish America

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. signed, Rosguill talk 14:33, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Greenland, the Danish part of the Americas. Greenland is the Danish colonial territory in North America, the Danish speaking region of the Americas, thus the appropriate target for such a redirect, such as other colonial territories British America or other linguistic territrories French America. -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 23:21, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambiguate Is anybody really looking for Greenland when searching "Danish America"? The primary topic here would seem to be Danish colonization of the Americas, rather than Greenland. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:33, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate per Hemiauchenia Rjensen (talk) 23:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Idiom is commonly used for the communities of Americans of Danish descent, but not for Greenland, which is neither a colonial territory nor a part of Denmark, but a country forming part of the Kingdom of Denmark. --Økonom (talk) 08:24, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The article is about people, not geography. We do not have redirects from Swedish America to Swedish Americans, French America to French Americans, etc.--Ipigott (talk) 08:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I am the nominator, I am fine with disambiguation -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 21:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:18, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambiguate per above. Seems to be a reasonale term for multiple pages. Also could include the Museum of Danish America. Respublik (talk) 13:50, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate Given the number of possible meanings here, whether or not they are common, I think its best to be conservative. A disambiguation page will give readers a better chance of finding what they are looking for. Uffda608 (talk) 23:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Drafted at the redirect. Jay 💬 07:15, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

FrenchLanguageInEnglish

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. While a numerical majority favor deletion, old CamelCase redirects are a canonical category of appropriate redirects, and no one has given a reason that that general principle should be set aside here. If there is a desire to revisit that global consensus, I would suggest an RfC. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 20:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unhelpful redirect at this stage of the encyclopedia, no significant page history, no incoming links or redirects besides the creator's user space from way back in the day TNstingray (talk) 19:24, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This appears to be a {{R from move}} and/or {{R from merge}}. I think (although the trail is hard to follow) this was the original title of the target article back in 2001 making it a {{R with old history}} too (it certainly exists as a page title on Nostalgia:FrenchLanguageInEnglish, although it didn't have any content on that date (20 December 2001). Thryduulf (talk) 00:50, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep from UseModWiki era of Wikipedia, and the use of CamelCase as pagenames and linktext {{R from camelcase}} -- camelCased redirects were maintained prior to the mid-2000s, and this is such an aged redirect, so grandfathered. -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 23:57, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for a stronger consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:50, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as ancient, useless cruft. Yes, this was the title of some content that was (badly) history merged into the history of what is now Etymology, as recorded at Wikipedia:Deletion log/August 2004 (1). But I don't see why that requires it exist in 2023 since all relevant edits exist somewhere in the messy early history of that page so nothing of value would be lost if this was deleted. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:38, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Ancient and messy history are both reasons why the project benefits from keeping this. Thryduulf (talk) 12:06, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Screen Casts

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 12#Screen Casts

The (Frankfort) State Journal

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 10:29, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While redirects are cheap, I feel that this is just too unlikely of spelling to be worth keeping. Cheers! Johnson524 05:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep. Rather odd formatting for a redirect, but it isn't doing any harm in my opinion. At least the spelling is correct. CycloneYoris talk! 08:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as R from move. Respublik (talk) 13:45, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I've seen titles like this for newspapers in bibliographies. Doesn't seem implausible to me. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

T-Minus(producer)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 03:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, T-Minus (producer), is the target of the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 02:40, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as malformed modifier --Lenticel (talk) 02:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above Johnson524 05:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Battle of Careson

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 03:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:RFD#DELETE #8, Careson seems to be a rather implausible typo for Kherson. SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 01:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete very unlikely spelling per nominator rationelle, and since a search for "Battle of Careson" on Google shows completely unrelated results to this battle. Johnson524 05:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of NASCAR Banking 500 Only from Bank of America broadcasters

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 15#List of NASCAR Banking 500 Only from Bank of America broadcasters

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_January_5&oldid=1197781257"