Supreme Court of Tasmania
Supreme Court of Tasmania | |
---|---|
42°53′10″S 147°19′46″E / 42.886048°S 147.329556°E | |
Established | 10 May 1824 |
Jurisdiction | Tasmania |
Location | Hobart |
Coordinates | 42°53′10″S 147°19′46″E / 42.886048°S 147.329556°E |
Composition method | Vice-regal appointment upon Premier's nomination, following advice of the Attorney General and the Executive Council. |
Authorised by | Parliament of Tasmania via the: Supreme Court Act 1959 (Tas) |
Appeals to | High Court of Australia |
Appeals from | Magistrates' Court of Tasmania |
Judge term length | Mandatory retirement by age of 72 |
Number of positions | 7 |
Website | www.supremecourt.tas.gov.au |
Chief Justice of Tasmania | |
Currently | Alan Blow OAM |
Since | 8 April 2013 |
The Supreme Court of Tasmania is the highest State court in the Australian State of Tasmania. In the Australian court hierarchy, the Supreme Court of Tasmania is in the middle level, with both an appellate jurisdiction over lower courts, and decisions made by Court to be heard on appeal by the High Court of Australia.
The ordinary sittings of the Court occur in Hobart, Launceston and Burnie in Tasmania. The Court's Appeal division sits only in Hobart.
History of the Court
The Supreme Court of Van Diemen's Land (as Tasmania was then known) was established by The Royal Letters Patent of 13 October 1823 and commenced activities on 10 May 1824.[1] The Court is the oldest Supreme Court in Australia and predates the Supreme Court of New South Wales, if only by a period of just ten days. The supreme courts of Tasmania and New South Wales were initiated through the New South Wales Act 1823, and this gave those courts jurisdiction over New Zealand.[2] Sir John Pedder, after whom Lake Pedder is named, was the first Chief Justice of the court.
The first counsel to appear before the Court was Joseph Tice Gellibrand, who was appointed Tasmania's first Attorney-General, and took his oaths on the first day of the new Court. The first case before the Court was the trial of William Tibbs, who was found guilty and sentenced for manslaughter, receiving 3 years transportation.[3]
Jurisdiction of the Court
It has unlimited jurisdiction within the state in civil matters and hears the most serious criminal matters. It is around the middle of the Australian court hierarchy. The Supreme Court consists of a Trial Division (also known as Original Jurisdiction) and an Appeal Division (or Appellate Jurisdiction).[4] When sitting in its appellate jurisdiction in civil matters it is the "Full Court"; for criminal matters it is the "Tasmanian Court of Criminal Appeal".[5]
Appeals from the Appeal Division of the Court are to the High Court of Australia. It was previously possible to appeal decisions of the Court of Appeal or the Court of Criminal Appeal (both parts of the Appeal Division) to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London, but this ceased in 1986 when the Parliament of Australia passed the Australia Act 1986, which terminated all such appeals to the Privy Council from Australian courts, except for those cases pending at that time.
Civil matters involving consent orders, or for disputes involving less than $50,000, are dealt with by the Magistrates Court except in exceptional circumstances.
The Court receives appeals from Magistrate Courts in Tasmania in both criminal and civil matters. Committal proceedings, which are used in criminal matters to establish whether there is sufficient evidence against an accused person to warrant the time and expense of a trial, were abolished in Tasmania in 2000 with the amendment of the Justices Act 1959 (Tas). The Justices Act 1959 now provides that where there has been a plea of not guilty by an accused, there must be an order committing them for trial in the Supreme Court.
Unlike some other Australian states, Tasmania does not have an intermediate court division between the Supreme Court and the Magistrates Courts (such as a "District Court" or a "County Court").[6]
Composition of the Court
The Supreme Court of Tasmania is composed of up to seven judges appointed by the Governor on the advice of the Executive Council, a body of senior ministers including the state Premier. As of 19 December 2017[update] the judges of the Supreme Court of Tasmania are:
Of the judges who have served on the Supreme Court of Tasmania as of 19 December 2017[update], including Chief Justices and Puisne Judges: 13 had previously served in the Parliament of Tasmania, Algernon Montagu, Thomas Horne, Valentine Fleming, Francis Smith, William Lambert Dobson, William Giblin, John Stokell Dodds, Robert Patten Adams, Andrew Inglis Clark, Herbert Nicholls, Norman Ewing, Richard Green and Merv Everett.
In addition, Norman Ewing and Merv Everett had previously served in the Australian Senate, while Alexander Macduff Baxter had previously served in the New South Wales Legislative Council.
John Pedder and Thomas Horne served in the Tasmanian Legislative Council while serving as judges, while Thomas Horne was elected to the Tasmanian House of Assembly after his judicial service.
Position | Name | Appointment commenced |
Appointment ended |
Term in office | Comments | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chief Justice | Sir John Pedder | 4 March 1824 | 4 May 1854 | 30 years, 61 days | [7] | |
Sir Valentine Fleming | 7 August 1854 | 31 December 1869 | 15 years, 146 days | |||
Sir Francis Smith | 8 August 1870 | 7 February 1885 | 14 years, 183 days | |||
Sir William Lambert Dobson | 7 February 1885 | 17 March 1898 | 13 years, 38 days | |||
Sir John Stokell Dodds | 29 October 1898 | 26 June 1914 | 15 years, 240 days | |||
Sir Herbert Nicholls | 1 July 1914 | 31 October 1937 | 23 years, 122 days | |||
Sir Harold Crisp | 21 December 1937 | 14 April 1940 | 2 years, 115 days | |||
Sir John Morris | 15 April 1940 | 3 July 1956 | 16 years, 79 days | |||
Sir Stanley Burbury | 28 August 1956 | 29 October 1973 | 17 years, 62 days | |||
Sir Guy Green | 30 October 1973 | 1 September 1995 | 21 years, 306 days | |||
William Cox | 4 September 1995 | 1 December 2004 | 9 years, 88 days | |||
Peter Underwood | 2 December 2004 | 28 March 2008 | 3 years, 117 days | |||
Ewan Crawford | 24 April 2008 | 7 April 2013 | 4 years, 348 days | |||
Alan Blow | 8 April 2013 | 11 years, 276 days | [7][8][9] | |||
Judge | Algernon Montagu | 31 January 1833 | 31 December 1847 | 14 years, 334 days | [10] | |
Thomas Horne | 1 January 1848 | 1 November 1860 | 12 years, 305 days | |||
Sir Francis Smith | 1 November 1860 | 7 February 1885 | 24 years, 98 days | |||
Sir William Lambert Dobson | 8 August 1870 | 17 March 1898 | 27 years, 221 days | |||
William Giblin | 7 February 1885 | 17 January 1887 | 1 year, 344 days | |||
Robert Patten Adams | 14 March 1887 | 31 May 1898 | 11 years, 78 days | |||
Andrew Inglis Clark | 1 June 1898 | 14 November 1907 | 9 years, 166 days | |||
John McIntyre | 20 October 1898 | 30 June 1914 | 15 years, 253 days | |||
Sir Herbert Nicholls | 1 January 1909 | 31 October 1937 | 28 years, 303 days | |||
Edward Dobbie | 1 January 1914 | 28 August 1915 | 1 year, 239 days | |||
Sir Harold Crisp | 1 August 1914 | 14 April 1940 | 25 years, 257 days | |||
Norman Ewing | 23 September 1915 | 19 July 1928 | 12 years, 300 days | |||
Andrew Inglis Clark, Jr. | 31 August 1928 | 20 February 1952 | 23 years, 173 days | |||
Wilfred Hutchins | 1 November 1938 | 23 March 1950 | 11 years, 142 days | |||
Sir Richard Green | 1 June 1950 | 19 March 1961 | 10 years, 291 days | |||
Marcus Gibson | 2 May 1951 | 11 January 1968 | 16 years, 254 days | |||
Sir Peter Crisp | 21 March 1952 | 1 March 1971 | 18 years, 345 days | |||
Sir George Crawford | 10 November 1958 | 11 December 1981 | 23 years, 31 days | |||
William Ellis Cox | 28 March 1961 | 15 March 1963 | 1 year, 352 days | |||
Frank Neasey | 18 March 1963 | 13 September 1990 | 27 years, 179 days | |||
David Chambers | 27 February 1968 | 24 September 1978 | 10 years, 209 days | |||
Robert Nettlefold | 2 March 1971 | 15 May 1990 | 19 years, 74 days | |||
Henry Cosgrove | 2 February 1977 | 23 September 1988 | 11 years, 234 days | |||
Merv Everett | 7 November 1978 | 14 March 1984 | 5 years, 128 days | |||
Cecil Brettingham-Moore | 21 March 1984 | 14 March 1986 | 1 year, 358 days | |||
William Cox | 2 February 1982 | 1 December 2004 | 22 years, 303 days | |||
Peter Underwood | 20 August 1984 | 28 March 2008 | 23 years, 221 days | |||
Christopher Wright | 29 April 1986 | 7 March 2000 | 13 years, 313 days | |||
Ewan Crawford | 5 October 1988 | 7 April 2013 | 24 years, 184 days | |||
Bill Zeeman | 30 May 1990 | 10 March 1998 | 7 years, 284 days | |||
Pierre Slicer | 3 June 1991 | 18 September 2009 | 18 years, 107 days | |||
Peter Evans | 10 June 1998 | 7 June 2013 | 14 years, 362 days | |||
Alan Blow | 13 June 2000 | 24 years, 210 days | [7][8][9] | |||
Shan Tennent | 15 March 2005 | 3 November 2017 | 12 years, 233 days | [10] | ||
David Porter | 26 May 2008 | 21 May 2016 | 7 years, 361 days | [10] | ||
Helen Wood | 9 November 2009 | 15 years, 61 days | [8][11] | |||
Stephen Estcourt | 8 April 2013 | 11 years, 276 days | [8][12] | |||
Robert Pearce | 11 June 2013 | 11 years, 212 days | [8][13] | |||
Michael Brett | 11 July 2016 | 8 years, 182 days | [8][14] | |||
Gregory Geason | 16 November 2017 | 12 November 2024 | 7 years, 54 days | Resignation due to impending criminal charges. | [8][15][16] | |
Tamara Jago | 1 November 2021 | 3 years, 69 days | [17] | |||
Master | Joseph Hone | 1824 | 1851 | 26–27 years | [18][19] | |
Cecil Brettingham-Moore | 1960 | 20 March 1984 | 23–24 years | Appointed a judge | [19] | |
Richard Southee | 1985 | 1999 | 13–14 years | |||
Master / Associate Judge [a] | Stephen Holt | 6 September 1999 | 31 August 2023 | 23 years, 359 days | [20] | |
Associate Judge | Michael Daly | 29 April 2024 | 255 days | [8][21] |
See also
Notes
- ^ On 1 March 2008 the title "Master" was changed to "Associate Judge"
References
- ^ Supreme Court History – Charter of Justice, Supreme Court of Tasmania
- ^ Wilson, James Oakley (1985) [First published in 1913]. New Zealand Parliamentary Record, 1840–1984 (4th ed.). Wellington: V.R. Ward, Govt. Printer. p. 16. OCLC 154283103.
- ^ R v Tibbs [1824] TASSupC 1 (24 May 1824), Supreme Court (Van Diemen's Land).
- ^ Supreme Court – Jurisdiction, Supreme Court of Tasmania
- ^ "Supreme Court : Judgments". Supreme Court of Tasmania. Retrieved 12 January 2018.
- ^ Annual Report 2007–2008, page 23, Supreme Court of Tasmania
- ^ a b c "The Chief Justices of Tasmania". Supreme Court of Tasmania. Retrieved 5 March 2019.
- ^ a b c d e f g h "Current judges". Supreme Court of Tasmania. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
- ^ a b "Alan Blow AO - Supreme Court of Tasmania". Supreme Court of Tasmania. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
- ^ a b c "The Puisne Judges of Tasmania". Supreme Court of Tasmania. Retrieved 5 March 2019.
- ^ "Helen Wood - Supreme Court of Tasmania". Supreme Court of Tasmania. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
- ^ "Stephen Estcourt AM - Supreme Court of Tasmania". Supreme Court of Tasmania. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
- ^ "Robert Pearce - Supreme Court of Tasmania". Supreme Court of Tasmania. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
- ^ "Michael Brett - Supreme Court of Tasmania". Supreme Court of Tasmania. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
- ^ "Gregory Geason - Supreme Court of Tasmania". Supreme Court of Tasmania. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
- ^ James, Ethan (12 November 2024). "Judge to quit after ex-partner assault guilty ruling". Glen Innes Examiner. Retrieved 12 November 2024.
- ^ "Tamara Jago - Supreme Court of Tasmania". Supreme Court of Tasmania. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
- ^ Brettingham-Moore, C G. "The Office of Master" (PDF). (1963) 1(6) University of Tasmania Law Review 842.
- ^ a b "Masters". Supreme Court of Tasmania. Retrieved 5 March 2019.
- ^ "Address by the Hon Associate Justice Stephen Holt on his retirement from the Supreme Court on 31 August 2023 - Supreme Court of Tasmania" (PDF). Supreme Court of Tasmania. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
- ^ "Michael Daly - Supreme Court of Tasmania". Supreme Court of Tasmania. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
The Associate Judge, a lower-ranking judicial officer previously called the Master, has responsibility for largely procedural matters in civil and criminal proceedings, and for some work in assessing the damages (amounts claimable) in civil proceedings.
2021 Supreme Court of Tasmania ruling
In February 2021, it was reported by LGBTQI+ media the Star Observer - Tasmania never officially legally ever recognized same-sex relationships at all from a ruling of the Supreme Court of Tasmania.[1][2][3]
See also
- Judiciary of Australia
- List of Judges of the Supreme Court of Tasmania
- List of Tasmanian Supreme Court cases
Notes
References
- ^ Thomas, Shibu (11 February 2021). "Six year fight for next of kin recognition for gay couple". Star Observer. Retrieved 18 November 2021.
- ^ Thomas, Shibu (18 March 2021). "Gay Man Loses Court Battle Over Next-Of-Kin Recognition". Star Observer. Retrieved 18 November 2021.
- ^ Jago v Anti-Discrimination Tribunal [2021] TASSC 10, Supreme Court (Tas)