Abusive power and control

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Abusive power and control (also controlling behavior and coercive control) is commonly used by an abusive person, people, or authoritative entity to gain and maintain power and control over another person or people or a family under Social Services Agency 'control' in order to subject that victim(s) to psychological, physical, mental, sexual, or financial abuse. This can affect the victim in negative ways, These include health problems, physical injuries, and long term post traumatic stress.The abuser may have a variety of motivations which can include devaluation, envy, personal gain, personal gratification, psychological projection, or simply the enjoyment of exercising power and control.[1]

Controlling abusers use tactics to exert power and control over their victims. The tactics themselves are psychologically and sometimes physically abusive. Control may be exerted through economic abuse, limiting the victim, as the victim may not have the means to resist or leave the abuse.[2] The goal of the abuser is to control, intimidate, and influence the victim to feel without an equal voice in the relationship.[3]

Manipulators and abusers may control their victims with a range of tactics, including, but not limited to, positive reinforcement (such as praise, superficial charm, flattery, ingratiation, love bombing, smiling, gifts, attention), negative reinforcement (taking away aversive tasks or items), intermittent or partial reinforcement, psychological punishment (such as nagging, silent treatment, swearing, threats, intimidation, emotional blackmail, guilt trips, inattention) and traumatic tactics (such as verbal abuse or explosive anger).[4][page needed]

The vulnerabilities of the victim are exploited, with those who are particularly vulnerable being most often selected as targets.[5][6][7] Traumatic bonding (also popularly known as Stockholm syndrome) can occur between abusers and victims as the result of ongoing cycles of abuse in which the intermittent reinforcement of reward and punishment creates powerful emotional bonds (that are resistant to change) and a climate of fear.[8] An attempt may be made to normalise, legitimise, rationalise, deny, or minimise the abusive behaviour, or to blame the victim for it.[9][10][11]

Isolation, gaslighting, mind games, lying, disinformation, propaganda, destabilisation, brainwashing, and divide and rule are other strategies that may be used. The victim may be plied with alcohol or drugs or deprived of sleep to become disoriented.[12][13] Based on statistical evidence, certain personality disorders correlate with abusive tendencies of individuals with those specific personality disorders when also compiled with abusive childhoods themselves.[14]

The seriousness of coercive control in modern Western societies has been increasingly recognised with changes to the law in several countries so it is a definable criminal offence. In conjunction with this, there have been increased attempts by the legal establishment to understand the characteristics and effects of coercive control in legal terminology. For example, on January 1, 2019, Ireland enacted the Domestic Violence Act 2018, which allowed for the practice of coercive control to be identifiable based upon its effects on the victim. And on this basis defining it as: 'any evidence of deterioration in the physical, psychological, or emotional welfare of the applicant or a dependent person which is caused directly by fear of the behaviour of the respondent'.[15] On a similar basis of attempting to understand and stop the widespread practice of coercive control, in 2019, the UK government made teaching about what coercive control was a mandatory part of the education syllabus on relationships.[16] While coercive control is often considered in the context of an existing intimate relationship, when it is used to elicit a sexual encounter it is legally considered as being a constituent part of sexual abuse or rape.[17] When it is used to begin and maintain a longer-term intimate relationship, it is considered to be a constituent element of sexual slavery.

Institutional abuse[edit]

Institutional abuse which is also known as organizational abuse,[18] is the maltreatment of a person (often children or older adults) from a system of power.[19] This can range from acts similar to home-based child abuse, such as neglect, physical and sexual abuse, and starvation, to the effects of assistance programs working below acceptable service standards, or relying on harsh or unfair ways to modify behavior.[19] Institutional abuse can take many different forms, some of them very small. An example of a small instance is insisting that the person in their care eat their meal or have their snack at the same time everyday, even when they do not want to.

Forms of Institutional abuse[18]

  • improper use of power
  • improper use of control
  • improper use of restraints
  • Taking away choices
  • Lack of personal possessions (clothing, items, trinkets, etc.)
  • No flexibility with schedules, particularly at bed time
  • financial abuse
  • physical abuse
  • verbal abuse
  • psychological abuse

Signs of Institutional abuse[18]

  • an unhygienic environment
  • an unsafe environment
  • rigid schedule
  • No privacy, respect, or dignity as a person
  • isolating from family and community
  • Lack of choices with food, activities, etc.
  • absence of respect for religion, cultural background, or beliefs
  • treating adults as children, particularly in small insignificant decisions


In England and Wales, Section 76 of the Serious Crime Act 2015 created a criminal offence for controlling or coercive behavior in an intimate or family relationship.[20][21] For the purposes of this offence, behaviour must be engaged in "repeatedly" or "continuously". Another, separate, element of the offence is that it must have a "serious effect" on someone and one way of proving this is that it causes someone to fear, on at least two occasions, that violence will be used against them. There is no specific requirement in the Act that the activity should be of the same nature. The prosecution should be able to show that there was intent to control or coerce someone.[22] For relevant behaviour, it has been criminalised in section 77 of the Serious Crime Act 2015.[23] In 2018, Jordan Worth became the first woman to be convicted under this new law.

In the United States, to assist in preventing and stopping domestic violence with children, there have been laws put into place to mandate report in specific professions, such as teacher, doctor, or care provider, any suspected abuse happening in the home. [24]

Caring professions[edit]

According to anti-bullying author and activist Tim Field, bullies are attracted to the caring professions, such as medicine, by the opportunities to exercise power over vulnerable clients, and over vulnerable employees and students.[25]

Intimate partner abuse[edit]


The power and control "wheel" was developed in 1982 by the Domestic Abuse Program in Minneapolis to explain the nature of abuse, to delineate the forms of abuse used to control another person, and to educate people with the goal of stopping violence and abuse. The model is used in many batterer intervention programs and is known as the Duluth model.[26] Power and control is generally present with violent physical and sexual abuse.[27]

Control development[edit]

Often the abusers are initially attentive, charming, and loving, gaining the trust of the individual that will ultimately become the victim, also known as the survivor. When there is a connection and a degree of trust, the abusers become unusually involved in their partner's feelings, thoughts, and actions.[8] Next, they set petty rules and exhibit "pathological jealousy". A conditioning process begins with alternation of loving followed by abusive behavior. According to Counselling Survivors of Domestic Abuse, "These serve to confuse the survivor leading to potent conditioning processes that impact on the survivor's self-structure and cognitive schemas." The abuser projects responsibility for the abuse onto the victim, or survivor, and the denigration and negative projections become incorporated into the survivor's self-image.[8] Control is the defining aspect of an abusive relationship. Catherine Hodes argues that while conflict is often found in these relationships, it is not the defining factor of abuse. Instead, an emphasis of power dynamics in domestic relationships is suggested to be the principle indicator. [28]

Traumatic bonding occurs as the result of ongoing cycles of abuse in which the intermittent reinforcement of reward and punishment creates powerful emotional bonds that are resistant to change.[8]

This can be summarised into 5 phases:

  1. Gain trust: The potential abuser is attentive, loving and charming.
  2. Over-involvement: The abuser becomes overly involved in the daily life and use of time.
  3. Petty rules and jealousy: Rules begin to be inserted to begin control of the relationship. Jealousy is considered by the abuser to be "an act of love".
  4. Manipulation, power and control: The victim is blamed for the abuser's behavior and becomes coerced and manipulated,
  5. Traumatic bonding: Ongoing cycles of abuse can lead to traumatic bonding.


Tactics of violent and non-violent relationships[29][3]
Power and control in violent relationships[30]

Controlling abusers use multiple tactics to exert power and control over their partners. According to Jill Cory and Karen McAndless-Davis, authors of When Love Hurts: A Woman's Guide to Understanding Abuse in Relationships: Each of the tactics within the power and control wheel are used to "maintain power and control in the relationship. No matter what tactics your partner uses, the effect is to control and intimidate you or to influence you to feel that you do not have an equal voice in the relationship."[3]

Coercion and threats[edit]

A tool for exerting control and power is the use of threats and coercion. The victim may be subject to threats that they will be left, hurt, or reported to welfare. The abuser may threaten that they will commit suicide. They may also coerce them to perform illegal actions or to drop charges that they may have against their abuser.[31] Strangulation, a particularly pernicious abusive behavior in which the abuser literally has the victim's life in his hands, is an extreme form of abusive control. Sorenson and colleagues have called strangulation the domestic violence equivalent of waterboarding, which is widely considered to be a form of torture.[32]

At its most effective, the abuser creates intimidation and fear through unpredictable and inconsistent behavior.[8] Absolute control may be sought by any of four types of sadists: explosive, enforcing, tyrannical, or spineless sadists. The victims are at risk of anxiety, dissociation, depression, shame, low self-esteem, and suicidal ideation.[33]


Abused individuals may be intimidated by the brandishing of weapons, destruction of their property or other things, or use of gestures or looks to create fear.[31] For example, threatening to use a gun or simply displaying the weapon is a form of intimidation and coercive control.[34]

Economic abuse[edit]

An effective means of ensuring control and power over another is to control their access to money. One method is to prevent the victim from getting or retaining a job. Controlling their access to money can also be done by withholding information and access to family income, taking their money, requiring the person to ask for money, giving them an allowance, or filing a power of attorney or conservatorship, particularly in the case of economic abuse of the elderly.[31]

Emotional abuse[edit]

Emotional abuse includes name-calling, playing mind games, putting the victim down, blaming the victim, insulting, stalking, ignoring, discounting their feelings and experiences,[35] online harassment, isolating and controlling,[36] or humiliating the individual, private or personal. The goals are to make the person feel badly about themselves, feel guilt, or think that they are crazy.[31] Eventually the victim loses their sense of self worth, self confidence, the trust of their own thoughts and feelings, and who they are as a person.[35] Various studies done by psychologists, such as Angela Kent and Glenn Waller, as well as Hart and Bassard, have found more connections between emotional abuse in childhood being carried into adulthood in professional and personal lives. [37]


Another element of psychological control is the isolation of the victim from the outside world.[27] Isolation includes controlling a person's social activity: who they see, who they talk to, where they go, and any other method to limit their access to others. It may also include limiting what material is read.[31] It can include insisting on knowing where they are and requiring permission for medical care. The abuser exhibits hypersensitive and reactive jealousy.[27]

Minimizing, denying, and blaming[edit]

The abuser may deny the abuse occurred in order to attempt to place the responsibility for their behavior on the victim. Minimizing concerns or the degree of the abuse is another aspect of this control.[31] They will sometimes tell them that they are too sensitive, it's not that big of a deal, or anything along these lines to minimise the feelings and experiences of the victim. The abuser also tends to blame the victim for the problems in the relationship.

Using children and pets[edit]

Children may be used to exert control by the abuser threatening to take the children or making them feel guilty about the children. It could include harassing them during visitation or using the children to relay messages. Another controlling tactic is abusing pets.[31]

Using privilege[edit]

Using "privilege" means that the abuser defines the roles in the relationship, makes the important decisions, treats the individual like a servant, and acts like the "master of the castle".[31]

Psychological warfare[edit]


The practice of repression in Zersetzung, a psychological warfare technique used by the Ministry for State Security (Stasi) to repress political opponents in East Germany, comprised extensive and secret methods of control and psychological manipulation, including personal relationships of the target, for which the Stasi relied upon its network of informal collaborators,[38] (in German inoffizielle Mitarbeiter or IM), the state's power over institutions, and on operational psychology. Using targeted psychological attacks the Stasi tried to deprive a dissident of any chance of a "hostile action".

Serial killers[edit]

The main objective for one type of serial killer is to gain and exert power over their victim. Such killers are sometimes abused as children, leaving them with feelings of powerlessness and inadequacy as adults.[39] Many power or control-motivated killers sexually abuse their victims, but they differ from hedonistic killers in that rape is not motivated by lust (as it would be with a lust murder), but as simply another form of dominating the victim.[40] (See article causes of sexual violence for the differences regarding anger rape, power rape, and sadistic rape.) Ted Bundy is an example of a power/control-oriented serial killer.

In the workplace[edit]

A power and control model has been developed for the workplace, divided into the following categories:[41]

  • overt actions
  • covert actions
  • emotional control
  • isolation
  • economic control
  • tactics
  • restriction
  • management privilege

Workplace psychopaths[edit]

The authors of the book Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work describe a five-phase model of how a typical workplace psychopath climbs to and maintains power:[42]

  1. Entry – psychopath will use highly developed social skills and charm to obtain employment into an organisation. At this stage it will be difficult to spot anything that is indicative of psychopathic behaviour, and as a new employee one might perceive the psychopath to be helpful and even benevolent.
  2. Assessment – psychopath will weigh one up according to one's usefulness, and one could be recognised as either a pawn (who has some informal influence and will be easily manipulated) or a patron (who has formal power and will be used by the psychopath for protection against attacks)
  3. Manipulation – psychopath will create a scenario of "psychopathic fiction" where positive information about themselves and negative disinformation about others will be created, where one's role as a part of a network of pawns or patrons will be used and one will be groomed into accepting the psychopath's agenda.
  4. Confrontation – the psychopath will use techniques of character assassination to maintain an agenda, and one will be either discarded as a pawn or used as a patron
  5. Ascension – one's role as a patron in the psychopath's quest for power will be discarded, and the psychopath will usurp a position of power and prestige from anyone who once supported them.

Personality psychology[edit]

In the study of personality psychology, certain personality disorders display characteristics involving the need to gain compliance or control over others:[43]

Psychological manipulation[edit]

Braiker identified the following ways that manipulators control their victims:[4]

Since the Technological Revolution, online communities have expanded, along with it, online psychological manipulation. Algorithms are being made to detect key phrases, words, images, or "gifs" that contribute to psychological manipulation happening in social media and within online communities.[46]

Manipulators may have:[4]

  • a strong need to attain feelings of power and superiority in relationships with others
  • a want and need to feel in control
  • a desire to gain a feeling of power over others in order to raise their perception of self-esteem.

Emotional blackmail[edit]

Emotional blackmail is a term coined by psychotherapist Dr. Susan Forward, about controlling people in relationships and the theory that fear, obligation, and guilt (FOG) are the transactional dynamics at play between the controller and the person being controlled. Understanding these dynamics is useful to anyone trying to extricate themselves from the controlling behavior of another person, and deal with their own compulsions to do things that are uncomfortable, undesirable, burdensome, or self-sacrificing for others.[47]

Forward and Frazier identify four blackmail types each with their own mental manipulation style:[48]

Type Examples
Punisher's threat Eat the food I cooked for you or I'll hurt you.
Self-punisher's threat Eat the food I cooked for you or I'll hurt myself.
Sufferer's threat Eat the food I cooked for you. I was saving it for myself. I wonder what will happen now?
Tantalizer's threat Eat the food I cooked for you and you just may get a really yummy dessert.

There are different levels of demands – demands that are of little consequence, demands that involve important issues or personal integrity, demands that affect major life decisions, and/or demands that are dangerous or illegal.[47]

Silent treatment[edit]

The silent treatment is sometimes used as a control mechanism. When so used, it constitutes a passive-aggressive action characterized by the coupling of nonverbal, but nonetheless unambiguous indications of the presence of negative emotion, with the refusal to discuss the scenario triggering those emotions and, when the source of those emotions is unclear to the other party, occasionally the refusal to clarify it or even to identify that source at all. As a result, the perpetrator of the silent treatment denies the victim both the opportunity to negotiate an after-the-fact settlement of the grievance in question and the ability to modify one's future behavior to avoid giving further offense. In especially severe cases, even if the victim gives in and accedes to the perpetrator's initial demands, the perpetrator may continue the silent treatment so as to deny the victim feedback indicating that those demands have been satisfied. The silent treatment thereby enables its perpetrator to cause hurt, obtain ongoing attention in the form of repeated attempts by the victim to restore dialogue, maintain a position of power through creating uncertainty over how long the verbal silence and associated impossibility of resolution will last, and derive the satisfaction that the perpetrator associates with each of these consequences.[49]

Love bombing[edit]

The expression has been used to describe the tactics used by pimps and gang members to control their victims,[50] as well as to describe the behavior of an abusive narcissist who tries to win the confidence of a victim.[51][52] In 2016, Claire Strutzenberg performed a study researching "love bombing" within the young adult age group 18 to 30 at college. She found in this study that this age group tended to communicate regularly at the start of the relationship, but as the relationship went on, one of the partners tended to passively push more toward being more dominant over the other partner gradually working toward "love bombing."[53]

Mind games[edit]

One sense of mind games is a largely conscious struggle for psychological one-upmanship, often employing passive–aggressive behavior to specifically demoralize or dis-empower the thinking subject, making the aggressor look superior; also referred to as "power games".[54]

In intimate relationships, mind games can be used to undermine one partner's belief in the validity of their own perceptions,[55] often referred to as 'gaslighting'. Personal experience may be denied and driven from memory;[56] and such abusive mind games may extend to denial of the victim's reality, social undermining, and the trivializing of what is felt to be important.[57] Both sexes have equal opportunities for such verbal coercion,[58] which may be carried out unconsciously as a result of the need to maintain one's own self-deception.[59]

Divide and conquer[edit]

A primary strategy the narcissist uses to assert control, particularly within their family, is to create divisions among individuals. This weakens and isolates each of them, making it easier for the narcissist to manipulate and dominate. Some are favoured, others are scapegoated. Such dynamics can play out in a workplace setting.[60]

Human trafficking[edit]

The use of coercion by perpetrators and traffickers involves the use of extreme control. Perpetrators expose the victim to high amounts of psychological stress induced by threats, fear, and physical and emotional violence. Tactics of coercion are reportedly used in three phases of trafficking: recruitment, initiation, and indoctrination.[61] During the initiation phase, traffickers use foot-in-the-door techniques of persuasion to lead their victims into various trafficking industries. This manipulation creates an environment where the victim becomes completely dependent upon the authority of the trafficker.[61] Traffickers take advantage of family dysfunction, homelessness, and history of childhood abuse to psychologically manipulate women and children into the trafficking industry.[62]

The goal of a trafficker is to turn a human being into a slave. To do this, perpetrators employ tactics that can lead to the psychological consequence of learned helplessness for the victims, where they sense that they no longer have any autonomy or control over their lives.[62] Traffickers may hold their victims captive, expose them to large amounts of alcohol or use drugs, keep them in isolation, or withhold food or sleep.[62] During this time the victim often begins to feel the onset of depression, guilt and self-blame, anger and rage, and sleep disturbances, PTSD, numbing, and extreme stress. Under these pressures, the victim can fall into the hopeless mental state of learned helplessness.[61][63][64]

Children are especially vulnerable to these developmental and psychological consequences of trafficking because they are so young. In order to gain complete control of the child, traffickers often destroy physical and mental health of the children through persistent physical and emotional abuse.[65] Stockholm syndrome is also a common problem for girls while they are trafficked, which can hinder them from both trying to escape, and moving forward in psychological recovery programs.[66]


Oppression is the exercise of authority or power in a burdensome, cruel, or unjust manner.[67]


An essential prerequisite of bullying is the perception, by the bully or by others, of an imbalance of social or physical power.[68][69]

Controlling and coercive behavior[edit]

Controlling individuals can be described as perfectionists[70] defending themselves against their own inner vulnerabilities in the belief that if they are not in total control they risk exposing themselves once more to childhood angst.[71] Such persons manipulate and pressure others to change so as to avoid having to change themselves,[72] and use power over others to escape an inner emptiness.[73] When a coercive individual's pattern is broken, the controller is left with a terrible feeling of powerlessness, but feeling their pain and fear brings them back to themselves.[74]

In terms of personality-type theory, controlling persons are very much the Type A personality, driven by the need to dominate and control.[75] An obsessive need to control others is also associated with antisocial personality disorder.[76]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Lehmann, Peter; Simmons, Catherine A.; Pillai, Vijayan K. (2012-08-01). "The Validation of the Checklist of Controlling Behaviors (CCB): Assessing Coercive Control in Abusive Relationships". Violence Against Women. 18 (8): 913–933. doi:10.1177/1077801212456522. ISSN 1077-8012. PMID 23008428. S2CID 39673421.
  2. ^ Economic abuse wheel. Women's Domestic Abuse Helpline. Retrieved December 13, 2016.
  3. ^ a b c Jill Cory; Karen McAndless-Davis. When Love Hurts: A Woman's Guide to Understanding Abuse in Relationships. WomanKind Press; 2000. ISBN 978-0-9686016-0-0. p. 30.
  4. ^ a b c Braiker, Harriet B (2003). "An Overview of Manipulation". Who's Pulling Your Strings?: How to Break the Cycle of Manipulation and Regain Control of Your Life. New York: McGraw Hill Professional. ISBN 9780071435680. Retrieved 24 July 2021.
  5. ^ Braiker, Harriet B. (2003). "An Overview of Manipulation". Who's Pulling Your Strings?: How to Break the Cycle of Manipulation and Regain Control of Your Life. New York: McGraw Hill Professional. p. 3. ISBN 9780071435680. Retrieved 24 July 2021. [...] if you make the manipulation ineffective by changing your behavior, the manipulator will be forced to change tactics or to seek an easier target elsewhere.
  6. ^ Simon, George K. (1996). "Recognizing the Tactics of Manipulation and Control". In Sheep's Clothing: Understanding and Dealing with Manipulative People (revised ed.). Little Rock, Arkansas: A.J. Christopher. ISBN 9780965169608.
  7. ^ Kantor, Martin (2006). The Psychopathology of Everyday Life: How to Deal with Manipulative People. ISBN 978-0-275-98798-5.
  8. ^ a b c d e Sanderson, C. (2008). Counselling Survivors of Domestic Abuse. Jessica Kingsley Publishers. ISBN 978-1-84642-811-1. Retrieved 28 November 2021.
  9. ^ Crosson-Tower, Cynthia (2005). Understanding Child Abuse and Neglect. Allyn & Bacon. p. 208. ISBN 0-205-40183-X.
  10. ^ Monique Mattei Ferraro; Eoghan Casey; Michael McGrath (2005). Investigating Child Exploitation and Pornography: The Internet, the Law and Forensic Science. Academic Press. p. 159. ISBN 0121631052. Retrieved April 6, 2016.
  11. ^ Christiane Sanderson (2006). Counselling Adult Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse. Jessica Kingsley Publishers. ISBN 1843103354. Retrieved April 6, 2016.
  12. ^ "Sleep Deprivation Used as Abuse Tactic". DomesticShelters.org.
  13. ^ "Family and Domestic Violence – Healthy Work Healthy Living Tip Sheet".
  14. ^ Miller, Paul M.; LISAK, DAVID (1999-06-01). "Associations Between Childhood Abuse and Personality Disorder Symptoms in College Males". Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 14 (6): 642–656. doi:10.1177/088626099014006005. ISSN 0886-2605. S2CID 144858964.
  15. ^ Baumann, J.D., Mark. "Coercive control and emotional abuse illegal in U.K., France, Ireland –and Clallam?". Clallam County Bar Clallam County lawyers & legal news. Retrieved 27 October 2020.
  16. ^ Price, Hannah. "Coercive control: 'I was 16 and thought it was normal'". BBC. Retrieved 27 October 2020. To raise awareness of all forms of abuse, the government made 'relationship education' compulsory in schools - coming into action in September 2020. The syllabus includes teaching students to identify financial, emotional and physical abuse in teenage and adult relationships.
  17. ^ "Sexual offences". CPS. Retrieved 9 August 2021.
  18. ^ a b c "Institutional Abuse Definition & Signs". Ann Craft Trust. 2019-05-08. Retrieved 2021-03-09.
  19. ^ a b Powers, J. L.; A. Mooney; M. Nunno (1990). "Institutional abuse: A review of the literature". Journal of Child and Youth Care. 4 (6): 81.
  20. ^ Statutory guidance framework: controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family relationship 05 Dec 2015 gov.uk
  21. ^ "University graduate from Poole admits controlling and coercive behaviour" Daily Echo 27 Mar 2019
  22. ^ "Controlling or Coercive Behaviour in an Intimate or Family Relationship". CPS.gov.uk. UKOpenGovernmentLicence.svg Text was copied from this source, which is available under an Open Government Licence v2.0. © Crown copyright.
  23. ^ "Serious Crime Act 2015". legislation.gov.uk.
  24. ^ Hyman, Ariella; Schillinger, Dean; Lo, Bernard (1995-06-14). "Laws Mandating Reporting of Domestic Violence: Do They Promote Patient Well-being?". JAMA. 273 (22): 1781–1787. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520460063037. ISSN 0098-7484. PMID 7769774.
  25. ^ Field, T. (2002). "Bullying in medicine". BMJ. 324 (7340): 786a–786. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7340.786/a. PMC 1122715. PMID 11923166.
  26. ^ McClennen, J. (2010). Social Work and Family Violence: Theories, Assessment, and Intervention. Springer Publishing Company. p. 147. ISBN 978-0-8261-1133-3. Retrieved 28 November 2021.
  27. ^ a b c Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. World Health Organization. 2013. ISBN 978-92-4-156462-5. p. 7.
  28. ^ Hodes, Catherine; Mennicke, Annelise (2019-06-01). "Is It Conflict or Abuse? A Practice Note for Furthering Differential Assessment and Response". Clinical Social Work Journal. 47 (2): 176–184. doi:10.1007/s10615-018-0655-8. ISSN 1573-3343. S2CID 150357825.
  29. ^ McClennen 2010, p. 148.
  30. ^ McClennen 2010, p. 149.
  31. ^ a b c d e f g h Power and Control. Duluth Model. Retrieved April 19, 2014.
  32. ^ Thomas, KA; Joshi, M; Sorenson, SB (2014). "'Do you know what it feels like to drown?': Strangulation as coercive control in intimate relationships". Psychology of Women Quarterly. 38: 124–137. doi:10.1177/0361684313488354. S2CID 144979650.
  33. ^ Sanderson 2008, p. 25.
  34. ^ Sorenson SB, Schut RA. "Nonfatal gun use in intimate partner violence: a systematic review of the literature". Trauma Violence & Abuse. 2016 Sep 14. [Epub ahead of print]
  35. ^ a b "Emotional Abuse". utdallas.edu. Retrieved 2021-03-10.
  36. ^ "Kupferman & Golden Family Law – Emotional Abuse and Intimidation in Domestic Violence". Retrieved 2021-03-10.
  37. ^ Kent, Angela (May 1998). "The Impact of Childhood Emotional Abuse: An Extension of the Child Abuse and Trauma Scale". Child Abuse and Neglect. 22 (5): 393–399. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00007-6. PMID 9631251 – via Science Direct.
  38. ^ Federal Commissioner for the Records of the State Security Service of the former German Democratic Republic: The Unofficial Collaborators (IM) of the MfS
  39. ^ Davies, Nicola (June 26, 2018). "From Abused Child to Serial Killer: Investigating Nature vs Nurture" (PDF). Psychiatry Advisor.
  40. ^ Egger, Steven A. (2000). "Why Serial Murderers Kill: An Overview". Contemporary Issues Companion: Serial Killers.
  41. ^ Power & Control in the Workplace American Institute on Domestic Violence
  42. ^ Baibak, P; Hare, R. D Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work (2007)
  43. ^ Larsen, Randy J., and David M. Buss. Personality Psychology: Domains of Knowledge about Human Nature. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2010. ISBN 978-0073370682
  44. ^ Rappoport, Alan, Ph. D."Co-Narcissism: How We Adapt to Narcissism". The Therapist, 2005.
  45. ^ a b Adrian Raine; José Sanmartin.
  46. ^ Peleschyshyn, A.; Holub, Z.; Holub, I. (September 2018). "The Preliminary Stage of the Algorithm for Detecting Information and Psychological Manipulation in Online Communities". 2018 IEEE 13th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT). 2: 30–33. doi:10.1109/STC-CSIT.2018.8526632. ISBN 978-1-5386-6464-3. S2CID 53280120.
  47. ^ a b Johnson, R. Skip (16 August 2014). "Emotional Blackmail: Fear, Obligation and Guilt (FOG)". BPDFamily.com. Retrieved 18 October 2014.
  48. ^ Susan Forward/Donna Frazier, Emotional Blackmail (London 1997) pp. 28, 82, 145, 169 ISBN 978-0593042397
  49. ^ Petra Boynton The Telegraph (26 Apr 2013) Silent treatment: how to snap him out of it
  50. ^ Gangs and Girls: Understanding Juvenile Prostitution, Michel Dorais, Patrice Corriveau, McGill-Queen's Press – MQUP, 2009, p. 38
  51. ^ Red Flag of a Narcissist #1: Love Bombing Archived 2015-08-23 at the Wayback Machine; My Narcissistic Ex-Husband
  52. ^ "Helen Bailey murder trial: Ian Stewart 'grossly deceived' author". BBC News Online. BBC. 16 February 2017. Retrieved 22 February 2017.
  53. ^ Strutzenberg, Claire (December 2016). "Love-Bombing: A Narcissistic Approach to Relationship Formation". Human Development, Family Sciences and Rural Sociology.
  54. ^ Gita Mammen, After Abuse (2006) p. 29
  55. ^ Kathleen J, Ferraro, Neither Angels nor Demons (2006) p. 82
  56. ^ R. D. Laing, The Politics of Experience (Penguin 1984) p. 31
  57. ^ Laurie Maguire, Where there's a Will there's a Way (London 2007) p. 76
  58. ^ Kate Fillion, Lip Service (London 1997) p. 244
  59. ^ R. D. Laing, Self and Others (Penguin 1969) p. 143
  60. ^ Hall J It’s You and Me Baby: Narcissist Head Games The Narcissist Family Files 27 Mar 2017
  61. ^ a b c Hopper, E. and Hidalgo, J. (2006). "Invisible chains: Psychological coercion of human trafficking victims". Intercultural Human Rights Law, 1, 185–209.
  62. ^ a b c Wilson, B.; Butler, L. D. (2013). "Running a gauntlet: A review of victimization and violence in the pre-entry, post-entry, and peri-/post-exit periods of commercial sexual exploitation". Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. 6 (5): 494–504. doi:10.1037/a0032977.
  63. ^ Segerstron, S. C.; Miller, G. E. (2004). "Psychological stress and the human immune system: A meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry". Psychological Bulletin. 130 (4): 601–630. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.601. PMC 1361287. PMID 15250815.
  64. ^ Zimmerman, C., Hossain, M., Yun, K., Roche, B., Morison, L., and Watts, C. (2006). Stolen Smiles: A summary report on the physical and psychological health consequences of women and adolescents trafficked in Europe. The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine: Daphne, 1–28.
  65. ^ Rafferty, Y (2008). "The impact of trafficking on children: Psychological and social policy perspectives". Child Development Perspectives. 2: 13–18. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00035.x.
  66. ^ Rafferty, Y (2013). "Child trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation: A review of promising prevention policies and programs". American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 83 (4): 559–575. doi:10.1111/ajop.12056. PMID 24164528.
  67. ^ definition from Merriam Webster Online.
  68. ^ "Children who are bullying or being bullied". Cambridgeshire County Council: Children and families. Cambridgeshire County Council. 2013-07-24. Archived from the original on 2013-10-29. Retrieved 2013-10-28.
  69. ^ Ericson, Nels (June 2001). "Addressing the Problem of Juvenile Bullying" (PDF). OJJDP Fact Sheet #FS-200127. U.S. Department of Justice: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. 27. Retrieved 2013-10-28.
  70. ^ Michelle N. Lafrance, Women and Depression (2009) p. 89
  71. ^ Art Horn, Face It (2004) p. 53
  72. ^ Robin Skynner/John Cleese, Families and how to survive them (London 1994) p. 208
  73. ^ Robert Bly and Marion Woodman, The Maiden King (Dorset 1999) p. 141
  74. ^ Patricia Evans, Controlling People (Avon 2002) pp. 129, 274
  75. ^ Andrew Holmes/Dan Wilson, Pains in the Office (2004) p. 56
  76. ^ Martha Stout, The Sociopath Next Door (2005) p. 47

External links[edit]