Bantu peoples in South Africa
It has been requested that the title of this article be changed to the relevant discussion. The page should not be moved unless the discussion is closed; summarizing the consensus achieved in support of the move.. Please see
This article needs additional citations for verification. (June 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: This entire article needs a copy edit to rephrase much of the text to match actual English grammar (December 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Black people from South Africa were at times officially called Bantu (Afrikaans: Bantoe) by the apartheid regime. The term Bantu is derived from the word for "people" common to many of the Bantu languages. The Oxford Dictionary of South African English describes its contemporary usage in a racial context as "obsolescent and offensive" because of its strong association with white minority rule and the apartheid system. However, Bantu is used without pejorative connotations in other parts of Africa and is still used in South Africa as the name for the languages these people speak.
History regarding indigenous South African bantu speakers has in the past significantly been affected by deliberate propagation and attempts of successfully entrenching untruthful narratives through orientation based on racism interests eg. Empty land myth, and preservation ways on the side of the indigenous South Africans (including Khoisan groups) couldn't effectively defend against the manipulation in those past times.
The earliest evidence of activities related to Bantu speakers in Southern Africa is from three archaeological sites dated 354 to 68 BCE, located in the southernmost region of what is now Mozambique. These sites are named Zitundo, University Campus and Changalane II. In South Africa itself, the oldest evidence of Bantu speakers is a site named Silver Leaves dated between 209 and 370 CE.
One of the seven terracotta artifacts referred to as the Lydenburg heads, dated c. 500 CE
The golden rhinoceros, part of the Mapungubwe Collection
Golden anklet coils from Mapungubwe
The aptness of Africans indigenous to South Africa is dominantly marked by the spread of two language groups, the Nguni (Xhosa, Zulu, Ndebele, and Swazi), who historically mainly occupied the eastern coastal plains, and the Sotho–Tswana, who lived on the interior plateau. The two language groups have diverged and differ on certain key aspects (especially in the sound systems), such divergence also presents itself to the rest of the South African bantu-language variety.
When the early Portuguese sailors Vasco Da Gama and Bartholomew Dias rounded the Cape of Good Hope in the 15th century CE, a number of Bantu speakers were found there. The indigenous population around the Cape was made up of the Khoisan groups being the most. Following the establishment of the Dutch Cape Colony, European settlers began arriving in Southern Africa in substantial numbers. Around 1770, Trekboers from the Cape encountered more presence of Bantu speakers around the Great Fish River and frictions arose between the two groups.
From the late 18th and early 19th centuries, there were two major areas of frictional contact between the white settlers and the Bantu speakers in Southern Africa. Firstly, as the Boers moved north inland from the Cape they encountered the Xhosa, the Basotho, and the Tswana. Secondly attempts at large coastal settlements were made by the British in Xhosa territory (now the Eastern Cape) and in Zululand (now KwaZulu-Natal).
This section needs expansion with: More details needed in the section below than only detailed events pertaining to a few groups. You can help by adding to it. (November 2019)
At the time KwaZulu-Natal was populated by dozens of small Zulu-speaking clans. In 1816 Shaka acceded to the Zulu throne (at that stage the Zulu were merely one of the many clans). Within a relatively short period of time he had conquered his neighbouring clans and had forged the Zulu into the most important ally of the large Mthethwa clan, which was in competition with the Ndwandwe clan for domination of the northern part of modern-day KwaZulu-Natal. By many accounts Shaka used ruthless military force against his opponents, often adopting a scorched earth policy to destroy or displace civilian populations.
After the death of the Mthethwa king Dingiswayo around 1818, at the hands of Zwide, the king of the Ndwandwe, Shaka assumed leadership of the entire Mthethwa alliance. The alliance under his leadership survived Zwide's first assault at the Battle of Gqokli Hill. Within two years he had defeated Zwide at the Battle of Mhlatuze River and broken up the Ndwandwe alliance, some of whom in turn began a murderous campaign against other Nguni communities, setting in motion what has come to be known as Mfecane, a mass migration of communities fleeing the Zulu. By 1825 he had conquered a huge empire covering a vast area from the sea in the east to the Drakensberg mountains in the west, and from the Pongola River in the north to the Bashee river in the south, not far from the modern day town of East London.
Shaka is well known for the many military, social, cultural and political reforms he used to create his highly organized and centralised Zulu state. The most important of these were the transformation of the army, thanks to innovative tactics and weapons he conceived, and a showdown with the spiritual leadership, limiting the power of traditional healers, and effectively ensuring the subservience of the Zulu church to the state. Whereas previous battles had been limited to relatively minor encounters, Shaka introduced the more deadly stabbing spear to replace the throwing spear, military encirclement to replace allowed retreat of the enemy, and the total destruction of lands to remove any means of sustenance for the enemy.
Shaka integrated defeated clans into the Zulu, on a basis of full equality, with promotions in the army and civil service being a matter of merit rather than circumstance of birth.
The smallest unit of the political organizational structure was the household, or kraal, consisting of a man, woman or women, and their children, as well as other relatives living in the same household. The man was the head of the household and often had many wives, and was the family's primary representative. The household and close relations generally played an important role. Households which lived in the same valley or on the same hill in a village were also an organizational unit, managed by a sub-chief.
Chiefdom-ship was largely hereditary, although chiefs were often replaced when not effective. In most clans the eldest son inherited the office of his father. In some clans the office was left to the oldest brother of the deceased chief, and after his death again the next oldest brother. This repeated until the last brother died. Next was the eldest son of the original chieftain; then the oldest one of the brothers as the leader. The chief was surrounded with a number of trusted friends or advisors, usually relatives like uncles and brothers, rather than influential headmen or personal friends. The degree of the democracy depended on the strength of the chieftain. The more powerful and more influential a chieftain was, the lesser the influence of his people. Although the leader had much power, he was not above the law. He could be criticized both by advisors as well as by his people, and compensation could be demanded. The people were divided into different clans or tribes which had their own functions, laws, and language.
South Africa's Bantu-speaking communities are roughly classified into four main groups: Nguni, Sotho–Tswana, Vhavenda and Shangana Tsonga, with the Nguni representing the largest group. These are divided as follows:
- Shangana-Tsonga people
- Sotho–Tswana people
- Venda people
Common among the two powerful divisions of the Nguni and the Sotho–Tswana are patrilineal societies, in which the leaders formed the socio-political units. Similarly, food acquisition was by cultivation and hunting. The most important differences are the strongly deviating languages, although both are Southern Bantu languages, and the different settlement types and relationships. In the Nguni settlements villages were widely scattered, whereas the Sotho–Tswana settled in towns.
This section needs expansion with: Multiple sections below are missing information, and other sections need to be added regarding the article. You can help by adding to it. (November 2019)
Traditionally, Bantu speakers were not territorially minded like the Europeans, but rather group-related. As long as sufficient land was available, they had only very vague conceptions of borders. Borders were natural features such as rivers or mountains, which were not by any means fixed.
Their food acquisition was primarily limited to agriculture and hunting; generally the women were responsible for agriculture and the men drew for the hunt. Except with the Tsonga (and partially the Mpondo), fishing was of surprisingly little importance. The diet consisted of corn (introduced from South-East Asia), meat (mostly wild game, boar, and beef), vegetables, milk, water and grain beer.
There were a number of taboos regarding the consumption of meat. No meat of dogs, apes, crocodiles or snakes could be eaten. Likewise taboo was the meat of some birds, like owls, crows and vultures, as well as the flesh of certain totem animals.
All Bantu-speaking communities commonly had clear separation between women's and men's tasks.
Traditionally, communities live in two different types of houses. The Nguni use the beehive house, a circular structure out of long poles, which is covered with grass. The huts of the Sotho–Tswana, Venda and Shangana Tsonga use the cone and cylinder house types. A cylindrical wall is formed out of vertical posts, which is sealed with mud and cow dung. The roof is built from tied-together poles. The floor of both types is compressed earth.
- Guthrie, M. 1967. Comparative Bantu. Farnboroiugh: Gregg International Publishers Ltd. Vols. 1-4.