Jump to content

Chemtrail conspiracy theory: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m Reverted edits by Truth cola to last revision by Professor marginalia (HG)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Chemtrails are real. This page is an insult to people's intelligence.



{{Redirect|Chemtrails|the [[Beck]] song|Chemtrails (song)}}
{{Redirect|Chemtrails|the [[Beck]] song|Chemtrails (song)}}
[[File:highflyingplanec.JPG|thumb|right|upright|High flying white jet leaving an expanding contrail]]
[[File:highflyingplanec.JPG|thumb|right|upright|High flying white jet leaving an expanding contrail]]

Revision as of 19:52, 5 May 2009

Chemtrails are real. This page is an insult to people's intelligence.


"Chemtrails" redirects here. For the Beck song, see Chemtrails (song).
File:Highflyingplanec.JPG
High flying white jet leaving an expanding contrail

The chemtrail conspiracy theory holds that some contrails are actually chemicals or biological agents deliberately sprayed at high altitudes for a purpose undisclosed to the general public. Versions of the chemtrail conspiracy theory circulating on the internet and radio talk shows theorize that the activity is directed by government officials.[1] As a result, federal agencies have received thousands of complaints from people who have demanded an explanation.[2] The existence of chemtrails has been repeatedly denied by government agencies and scientists around the world.[3]

The United States Air Force has stated that the theory is a hoax which "has been investigated and refuted by many established and accredited universities, scientific organizations, and major media publications".[4] The British Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has stated that chemtrails "are not scientifically recognised phenomena".[5] The Canadian Government House Leader has stated that "The term 'chemtrails' is a popularized expression, and there is no scientific evidence to support their existence."[6]

The term chemtrail is derived from "chemical trail" in the similar fashion that contrail is an abbreviation for condensation trail. It does not refer to common forms of aerial spraying such as crop dusting, cloud seeding or aerial firefighting. The term specifically refers to aerial trails allegedly caused by the systematic high-altitude release of chemical substances not found in ordinary contrails, resulting in the appearance of supposedly uncharacteristic sky tracks. Believers of this theory speculate that the purpose of the chemical release may be for global dimming, population control, weather control, or biowarfare and claim that these trails are causing respiratory illnesses and other health problems.[7]

Overview

The chemtrail conspiracy theory began to circulate in 1996 when the United States Air Force (USAF) was accused of "spraying the US population with mysterious substances" from aircraft "generating unusual contrail patterns".[4] The Air Force says these accusations were a hoax fueled in part by citations to a strategy paper drafted within the Air Force's Air University entitled Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025.[8] The paper was presented in response to a military directive to outline a future strategic weather modification system for the purpose of maintaining the United States' military dominance in the year 2025, and identified as "fictional representations of future situations/scenarios".[8] The Air Force further clarified the paper "does not reflect current military policy, practice, or capability", and that it is "not conducting any weather modification experiments or programs and has no plans to do so in the future.[4][9] Additionally, the Air Force states that the "'Chemtrail' hoax has been investigated and refuted by many established and accredited universities, scientific organizations, and major media publications."[4]

In Britain, when the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs was asked "what research her Department has undertaken into the polluting effects of chemtrails for aircraft", the response was that "the Department is not researching into chemtrails from aircraft as they are not scientifically recognised phenomena", but that work was being conducted to understand how contrails may effect weather now and to anticipate future impacts that could result from increases in air traffic.[5][10]

In a response to a petition by concerned Canadian citizens regarding "chemicals used in aerial sprayings are adversely affecting the health of Canadians," the Government House Leader responded by stating that "There is no substantiated evidence, scientific or otherwise, to support the allegation that there is high altitude spraying conducted in Canadian airspace. The term 'chemtrails' is a popularized expression, and there is no scientific evidence to support their existence." [11] [6][12][13] The house leader goes on to say that "it is our belief that the petitioners are seeing regular airplane condensation trails, or contrails."[6]

Various versions of the chemtrail conspiracy theory have circulated through internet websites and radio programs.[1] In some of the accounts, the chemicals are described as barium and aluminum salts, polymer fibers, thorium, or silicon carbide.[14] In other accounts it is alleged the skies are being seeded with electrical conductive materials as part of a massive electromagnetic superweapons program based around the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP).[15] Those who believe in the conspiracy say the chemtrails are toxic,[16] but the reasons given by those who believe in the conspiracy vary widely, spanning from military weapons testing, chemical population control, to global warming mitigation measures.[17] Federal agencies and scientists have consistently denied that chemtrails exist, insisting the sky tracks are simply persistent contrails.[14] As the chemtrail conspiracy theory spread, federal officials were flooded with angry calls and letters.[14] A multi-agency response to dispel the rumors was published in a 2000 fact sheet by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), a step many chemtrail believers have interpeted as further evidence of the existence of a government cover-up.[14]

Proponents of the chemtrail theory say that chemtrails can be distinguished from contrails by their long duration, asserting that the chemtrails are those skytracks that persist for as much as a half day or transform into cirrus-like clouds.[17] However, some contrails are visible for several hours according to Contrails facts, a USAF publication.[4] Air Force officials say that long lasting contrails result from certain atmospheric conditions, and their duration and rate of dissipation can be accurately predicted when humidity level and temperature are known.[4]

Contrails vs chemtrails

Contrails can be visible for several hours [4] but chemtrail conspiricists try to differentiate chemtrails from contrails by describing them as streams that sometimes persist in the sky for hours, and which sometimes trace criss-crossing, grid-like patterns, or parallel stripes which eventually blend to form large clouds. Another feature that proponents say distinguishes a chemtrail from a contrail is the presence of visible color prisms in the streams, unusual concentrations of sky tracks in a single area, or lingering tracks left by unmarked or military airplanes flying in atypical altitudes or locations.[1][14][18][19] [20]

Government agencies and other experts on contrail or atmospheric phenomena deny the existence of chemtrails, insisting that the characteristics attributed to them are simply features of contrails responding differently in diverse conditions in terms of the sunlight, temperature, horizontal and vertical wind shear, and humidity levels present at the aircraft's altitude.[4][1][14][18][19] These experts respond that what appears as patterns such as grids formed by contrails result from increased air traffic traveling through the gridlike United States National Airspace System's north-south and east-west oriented flight lanes, and that it is difficult for observers to judge the differences in altitudes between these contrails from the ground.[4] The jointly published fact sheet produced by NASA, the EPA, the FAA, and NOAA in 2000 in response to alarms over chemtrails details the science of contrail formation, and outlines both the known and potential impacts contrails have on temperature and climate.[21] The USAF produced a fact sheet as well that described these contrail phenomena as observed and analyzed since at least 1953. It also rebutted chemtrails' theories more directly by characterizing the theories as a hoax and denying the existence of any chemtrails.[4][14]

Patrick Minnis, an atmospheric scientist with NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia, is quoted in USA Today as saying that logic is not exactly a real selling point for most chemtrail proponents: "If you try to pin these people down and refute things, it's, 'Well, you're just part of the conspiracy', he said."[1]

In 2001, United States Congressman Dennis Kucinich introduced legislation that would have permanently prohibited the basing of weapons in space, and he listed chemtrails as one of a number of exotic weapons that would be banned.[22] Proponents have asserted that because explicit reference to chemtrails was entered by Congressman Kucinich into the congressional record, this constitutes official government acknowledgement of their existence.[19][23] But that bill received an unfavorable evaluation from the United States Department of Defense and died in committee,[24] with no mention of chemtrails appearing in the text of any of the three subsequent failed attempts by Kucinich to enact a Space Preservation Act.

Further reading

  • Thomas, William, "Stolen Skies: The Chemtrail Mystery", Earth Island Journal, July 1, 2002
  • Smith, Jerry E, "Weather Warfare: The Military's Plan To Draft Mother Nature", Adventures Unlimited Press, December 30, 2006
  • Penner, Joyce E. (1999). Aviation and the Global Atmosphere. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Working Group III., Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (illustrated ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521664047, 9780521664042. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: invalid character (help)
  • Thomas, William (August 2004). Chemtrails Confirmed (illustrated edition ed.). Bridger House Publishers. ISBN 1893157105, 978-1893157101. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help); Check |isbn= value: invalid character (help)
  • Johnson, M. Kim. 1999. Chemtrails analysis. NMSR Reports, 5(12), December.
  • Marrs, Jim. 2008. Above Top Secret. New York, NY: The Disinformation Company.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e Watson, Traci (2001-03-07), "Conspiracy theories find menace in contrails", USA Today, retrieved 2008-08-25, The theory: The white lines of condensed water vapor that jets leave in the sky, called contrails, are actually a toxic substance the government deliberately sprays on an unsuspecting populace.
  2. ^ See:
  3. ^ See:
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j "Contrails Facts" (PDF). AFD-051013-001. Air Force. 10/13/2005. Retrieved 2009-04-11. {{cite web}}: |first= missing |last= (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
  5. ^ a b "ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS Advisory Committee on Pesticides:Aircraft Pollution". Publications and Records:Bound Volume Hansard - Written Answers:Column 315W:[24397]. United Kingdom Parliament. 8 Nov 2005 : Column 315W. Retrieved 2009-03-12. Mr. Morley: The Department is not researching into chemtrails from aircraft as they are not scientifically recognised phenomena. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  6. ^ a b c "A Petition to the Canadian House of Commons: The Government's Response". Response. http://www.holmestead.ca. Retrieved 2009-04-13. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
  7. ^ See:
  8. ^ a b Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025
  9. ^ "EPA Aircraft Contrails Factsheet" (PDF). Air and Radiation (6205J):EPA430-F-00-005. United States Environmental Protection Agency. September 2000. Retrieved 2009-03-07.
  10. ^ "Aviation and the Global Atmosphere". Special Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 1999. p. 17. Retrieved 2009-04-12. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  11. ^ "37th PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION EDITED HANSARD • NUMBER 110 CONTENTS". Publications:Debates:-Committees of the House:Petitions:The Environment 1030. Parliament of Canada. Tuesday, June 3, 2003. Retrieved 2009-04-13. Mr. John Herron (Fundy—Royal, PC): Mr. Speaker, I am presenting a petition on behalf of Mr. Brian Holmes of Ontario regarding aerial spraying. Mr. Holmes has collected signatures from across the country from concerned Canadians who believe that chemicals used in aerial sprayings are adversely affecting the health of Canadians.The petitioners call upon Parliament to stop this type of high altitude spraying. The petition has been duly certified by the clerk and I present it at this time. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  12. ^ "Points to Ponder: Access to Information Act". Chemtrails - spraying in our sky. http://www.holmestead.ca/. Retrieved 2009-04-13. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
  13. ^ "A Petition to the Canadian House of Commons". Chemtrails - spraying in our sky. http://www.holmestead.ca/. Retrieved 2009-04-13. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
  14. ^ a b c d e f g Downing, Bob (2002-03-16), "Conspiracy theorists look up: Some argue jet contrails are U.S. chemical spray", Beacon Journal News, retrieved 2008-08-26
  15. ^ Hodapp, Christopher; Kannon, Alice Von (2008), Conspiracy Theories & Secret Societies for Dummies, For Dummies, ISBN 9780470184080
  16. ^ Perlingieri, Ilya (February 11, 2009). "The Worldwide Environmental Crisis Gone Missing: The Precautionary Principle". Global Research. Retrieved 2009-03-07. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  17. ^ a b Unkefer, Charlie (Wed Mar 04, 2009, 05:39 PM PST). "Citizen concern lingers over aluminum in water". Mount Shasta Area Newspapers. Retrieved 2009-03-07. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  18. ^ a b Schlatter, Thomas (2001-03-09), "Weather Queries: Chemtrail Controversy", Weatherwise
  19. ^ a b c Thomas, William (Summer 2002), ""Stolen Skies: The Chemtrail Mystery", Earth Island Journal, retrieved 2008-08-30
  20. ^ Hamilton, Dan (April 7, 2009 09:52 PM EDT). "Contrails vs. Chemtrails". Fox12 news at nine. Fox12 Idaho KTRV-TV. Retrieved 2009-04-11. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  21. ^ "Aircraft Contrails Factsheet" (PDF), Unites States Environmental Protection Agency, 2000-09, retrieved 2008-08-30 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |publication-date= (help)
  22. ^ Space Preservation Act of 2001
  23. ^ Bethel, Brian (2008-7-1), "Abilene man wants to warn you about the dangers of 'chemtrails'", Abilene Reporter-News, retrieved 2008-10-20 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |publication-date= (help)
  24. ^ H.R.2977, The Library of Congress
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory&oldid=288117077"