This is a good article. Click here for more information.

Iazyges

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Not to be confused with the Iapydes.
A unpainted stone sculpture of a Sarmatian man.
Sculpted image of a Sarmatian (an Iazyx would look similar) from the Casa degli Omenoni.[1]
An physical map of Europe under Emperor Hadrian with the borders of Rome in red.
The Roman empire under Hadrian (ruled 117–138), showing the location of the Iazyges in the plain of the Tisza river.[2]

The Iazyges (IPA: [aɪə'zɪɡiːz]; Ancient Greek: Ἰάζυγες, singular Ἰάζυξ) were an ancient Sarmatian tribe who travelled westward from Central Asia onto the steppes of what is now Ukraine in c. 200 BC. Later on, they moved further into Hungary and Serbia, settling near Dacia, in the steppe between the Danube and Tisza rivers.

In the Iazyges' early relationship with Rome, they were used as a buffer state, being between the Romans and the Dacians. Later on this would develop into an overlord and client-state relationship, with the Iazyges being nominally sovereign subjects of Rome. Throughout their relationship, the Iazyges would occasionally send raids into Roman land, which usually caused the Romans to respond with a punitive raid to discourage further harassment.

The Iazyges' name was variously Latinized as Iazyges Metanastae (Ἰάζυγες Μετανάσται) and Jazyges.[3] and sometimes as Iaxamatae.[a][6]

An ancient map of Dacia showing land in tan, mountains in brown, and water in blue.
The Ninth European Map (in two parts) from a 15th-century Greek manuscript edition of Ptolemy's Geography, showing the Wandering Iazyges in the northwest between Pannonia and Dacia.[7]

History[edit]

A colored political map of the Black Sea coast with locations shown with numerals and letters.
Location of the Iazyges (J) before they moved westward.[8]

In the 3rd century BC the Iazyges lived along the northern shores of the Sea of Azov – which the Ancient Greeks and Romans knew as the Lake of Maeotis – in modern south-east Ukraine. From there, the Iazyges, or at least part of them, moved west along the shores of the Black Sea into modern Moldova and southwest Ukraine.[9][10]

It is possible that the Iazyges did not move west in their entirety, and that some of them stayed along the Sea of Azov, which would explain the occasional surname of Metanastae, however if this is true, the Iazyges that remained along the Sea of Azov are never mentioned again.[11]

Early history[edit]

In the 2nd century BC, the Iazyges began to migrate west to the steppe near the Lower Dniester. One possible explanation of this was that the Roxolani, who were the Iazyges' eastern neighbors, were also migrating west, due to pressure from the Aorsi, which put pressure on the Iazyges and forced them to migrate west as well.[12][13]

From 78 to 76 BC, the Romans led an expedition to an area north of the Danube, then the Iazyges' territory, because the Iazyges had allied with Mithridates VI of Pontus, with whom the Romans were at war.[14][15] In 44 BC King Burebista of Dacia died, and his kingdom began to collapse. After this, the Iazyges began to take possession of the Pannonian Basin, the land between the Danube and Tisa rivers (modern south-central Hungary).[16] Historians have posited that this was done at the behest of the Romans, who sought to form a buffer state between their provinces and the Dacians.[17]

In 20 AD the Iazyges encountered the Basternae and Getae along their migration path, and turned southward, following the coast of the Black Sea until they settled in the Danube Delta.[12]

The effects of the migration have been observed in the ruins of burial sites left behind by the Iazyges, in that not only did they not have the standard items of gold being buried alongside a person, they even lacked the gear of a warrior. One explanation for this was that the Iazyges were no longer in contact with the Pontic Steppe, and thus cut off from all trade with them, which had previously been a vital part of their economy. Another problem the Iazyges had with their new location was that it lacked both precious minerals and metals, such as iron, that could be turned into weapons. The Iazyges found that it was much harder to raid the Romans, due to them often sending an organized punitive response. Due to their trade with the Pontic Steppe being cut off, they could no longer trade for gold for burial sites, assuming any of them could afford it. The only such goods they could find were the pottery and metals of the Dacian and Celtic peoples near them. Iron weapons would have been exceedingly rare, if the Iazyges even had them, and would likely have been passed down from father to son, rather than buried, because it could have been replaced.[18]

A colored political map of Balkans during the first century.
The Iazyges in the 1st century AD.[19]

During this time, the Iazyges conducted raids across their border with Rome, such as they did in 6 AD and again in 16 AD. However, in 20 AD the Iazyges moved west along the Carpathians into the Pannonian Steppe, and settled in the steppes between the Danube and the Tisza river, taking absolute control of it from the Dacians.[12] In 50 AD, an Iazyges cavalry detachment fought alongside the Suevian King Vannius, a Roman client king of the Quadi.[20]

In the Year of Four Emperors, 69 AD, the Iazyges gave their support to Vespasian, who went on to become the sole emperor of Rome. Vespasian enjoyed support from the majority of the Germanic and Dacian tribes.[21] The Iazyges also offered to guard the Roman border with the Dacians, in order to free up troops for Vespasian's invasion of Italy; however, Vespasian refused, fearing that they would attempt a takeover or defect.[22]

Emperor Domitian made peace with the Dacians in 89 AD, and, in the same year, invaded the Marcomanni, Quadi and Iazyges. Few details are known of the war, but it is known that the Romans were defeated.[23]

In early 92 AD the Iazyges and the Roxolani allied themselves with the Dacians and the Suebi, and crossed the Danube into the Roman province of Pannonia (modern Croatia, northern Serbia, and western Hungary). Domitian, who was devoting most of his army to attacking them near the Danube, called upon the Quadi and the Marcomanni to supply troops. They both refused, and Rome declared war upon them as well. In May 92 AD, the Iazyges annihilated the Roman Legio XXI Rapax in battle.[24][25] Domitian's campaign was unsuccessful; however, the Romans winning in a minor skirmish allowed him to claim it as a victory, even though he ended up paying the King of Dacia, Decebalus, an annual tribute of eight million sesterces in tribute to end the war.[21][26] He returned to Rome, and received an ovation, but not a full triumph. For a man who had been given the title of Imperator for military victories 22 times, this was markedly restrained, suggesting that the populace, or at least the senate, was aware of the fact that it had been a less than successful war, despite Domitian's claims otherwise.[24]

During the Flavian dynasty, the kings of the Iazyges were trained in the Roman army, officially as an honor, but in reality serving as a hostage, because the kings held absolute power over the Iazyges.[27] There were offers from the kings of the Iazyges to supply troops, but these were denied based on the fear that they might revolt or desert in a war.[28]

Dacian wars[edit]

During the time of Augustus's rule, there were eight legions stationed along the Rhine, four stationed in Mainz and another four in Cologne. Within a hundred years of Augustus' rule, however, Roman military resources had become centred along the Danube instead of the Rhine,[21] with nine legions stationed along the Danube and only one at the Rhine. By the time of Marcus Aurelius, twelve legions were stationed along the Danube.[29]

An alliance between the Iazyges and the Dacians led the Romans to focus more on the Danube than the Rhine. The Romans built a series of forts along the entire coast of the right Danube – from Germany all the way to the Black Sea and in the provinces of Rhaetia, Noricum, and Pannonia the legions constructed bridge-head forts. Later, this system was expanded to the lower Danube, with the key castra of Poetovio, Brigetio, and Carnuntum. Because the direction of the Danube river changes abruptly, it was much more difficult for the Roman legionaries who were trained in to fight in rectangular formation to defend. The Classis Pannonica and Classis Flavia Moesica were deployed to the right and lower Danube, respectively; however, they had to overcome the mass of whirlpools and cataracts of the Iron Gates.[29]

First Dacian War[edit]

Main article: Trajan's Dacian Wars

Trajan, with the assistance of the Iazyges, led his legions[b] into Dacia against King Decebalus, in the year 101.[30] In order to cross the Danube with such a large army, Apollodorus of Damascus, the Romans' chief architect, created a bridge through the Iron Gates by cantilevering it from the sheer face of the Iron Gates. From this he created a great bridge with sixty piers that spanned the Danube. Trajan used this to strike deep within Dacia, forcing the king, Decebalus, to surrender and become a client king.[31]

Second Dacian War[edit]

But as soon as Trajan returned to Rome, Decebalus began to lead raids into Roman territory. Trajan concluded that he had made a mistake in allowing Decebalus to remain so powerful.[31] In 106 AD, Trajan once more invaded Dacia, with 11 legions, and, again with the assistance of the Iazyges,[30] who were the only barbarian tribe that aided the Romans in this war,[c][33] rapidly pushed into Dacia. Decebalus chose to commit suicide rather than be captured, knowing that, if he were, he would be paraded in a triumph before being executed. In 113 AD Trajan annexed Dacia as a new Roman province, the first Roman province to the east of the Danube; However, Trajan did not incorporate the steppe between the Tisza river and the Transylvanian mountains into the province of Dacia, but left it for the Iazyges.[34] Back in Rome, Trajan was given a triumph lasting 123 days, with lavish gladiatorial games, and chariot races. The wealth coming from the gold mines of Dacia funded these lavish public events, and also the construction of a column, designed and constructed by Apollodorus of Damascus, that was 100 feet (30 m) tall with 23 spiral bands filled with 2,500 figures, giving a full depiction of the Dacian war. While ancient sources say 500,000 slaves were taken in the war, moderns sources believe that it was probably closer to 100,000 slaves.[35]

After the Dacian Wars[edit]

A sculpted scene from Trajan's Column of Roman cavalry fighting Sarmatian cavalry.
Roman cavalry (left) fighting Sarmatian cavalry (right).[36]

Ownership of the region of Oltenia became a source of dispute between the Iazyges and the Roman empire. The Iazyges had originally occupied the area before the Dacians seized it; it was later taken again by Trajan, who was determined to constitute Dacia as a province. The dispute was resolved with a peace treaty after Hadrian invaded the Iazyges. The exact terms of the settlement are not known, but it is believed that the Romans kept Oltenia in exchange for some form of concession, likely a one-time tribute payment.[30] The Iazyges also took possession of Banat around this time, suggesting it may have been part of the treaty.[37]

The Iazyges and the Roxolani invaded Lower Pannonia and Lower Moesia, respectively, in 117. The war was probably brought on by difficulties in visiting and trading with each other due to the location of Dacia between them. The Dacian provincial governor, Gaius Julius Quadratus Bassus, was killed in the invasion. The Roxolani surrendered first, so it is likely that the Romans exiled and then replaced their client king with one of their choosing. The Iazyges concluded peace by sending an embassy to Rome, where it is believed they became a client state of Rome.[38]

After the Iazyges and other Sarmatians invaded Roman Dacia, in 123, Marcius Turbo stationed a thousand legionaries in Potaissa and Porolissum. The Romans probably used these towns as the invasion point into Rivulus Dominarum. Marcius Turbo succeeded in defeating the Iazyges; however, the terms of the peace, and the date, are not known.[39]

The Iazyges, Quadi, and Marcomanni once again invaded Roman territory in 169. Marcus Claudius Fronto, a former general during the Parthian wars, then the governor of both Dacia and Upper Moesia, held them back for some time but was killed in battle in 170.[40] The Quadi were the first to surrender, in 172. The known terms of the peace are that Marcus Aurelius installed a client king, Furtius, on their throne, and the Quadi were denied access to the Roman markets along the limes. The Marcomanni accepted a similar peace, but the name of their client-king is not known.[41]

In 173, the Quadi rebelled and overthrew Furtius, who was their client-king appointed to them by Rome, and replaced him with Ariogaesus, who wanted to enter into negotiations with Marcus. As the success of the Marcomannic wars was in no danger, Marcus refused to negotiate.[41] At that point only the Iazyges had not yet been defeated by Rome. Judging from the lack of action on Marcus Aurelius' part, it appears he was unconcerned, but when the Iazyges attacked across the frozen Danube in late 173 and early 174, Marcus redirected his attention to them. Trade restrictions on the Marcomanni were also partially lifted at that time – they were allowed to visit the Roman markets at certain times of certain days. In an attempt to force Marcus to negotiate, Ariogaesus began to support the Iazyges.[42] Marcus Aurelius put out a bounty on him, offering 1,000 aurei for his capture and delivery to Rome, or 500 aurei for his severed head.[43][d] After this, Ariogaesus was captured by the Romans, but rather than executing him, Marcus Aurelius sent him into exile.[45]

In the winter of 173, the Iazyges launched a raid across the frozen Danube, but the Romans were ready for pursuit and followed them back to the Danube. The Iazyges prepared an ambush, planning to attack and scatter them as they tried to cross the frozen Danube, knowing that the Roman legionaries were not trained to fight on ice, and that their own horses had been trained to fight on ice without slipping. However the Roman army formed a solid square and dug into the ice with their shields, so that they would not slip. When the Iazyges could not break the Roman lines, the Romans counterattacked, pulling the Iazyges off of their horses by grabbing on to their spears, clothing and shields. Soon both armies were in disarray after having slipped on the ice, and the battle was reduced to many brawls between the two sides, literally tooth and nail battles, which the Romans won. After this battle the Iazyges, and presumably the Sarmatians in general, were declared the primary enemy of Rome.[46]

The Iazyges surrendered to the Romans in 175.[47][48] Their king, Banadaspus, had attempted peace in early 174; however, the offer was refused, and Banadaspus was deposed by the Iazyges and replaced by Zanticus.[e][42] The terms of the peace treaty were harsh: the Iazyges were required to provide 8,000 men as auxiliaries and release 100,000 Romans they had taken hostage, and forbidden from living within ten Roman miles (roughly 9 miles or 15 km) of the Danube. Marcus had intended to give even harsher terms – it is said by Cassius Dio that he wanted to entirely exterminate the Iazyges,[50] – but was distracted by the rebellion of Avidius Cassius.[42] Of the 8,000 auxiliaries, 5,500 of them were sent to Britannia, suggesting that the situation there was serious; it is likely that the British tribes, seeing the Romans being preoccupied with war in Germania and Dacia, had decided to rebel. All of the evidence suggests that the Iazyges' horsemen were an impressive success.[51] After Marcus Aurelius had beaten the Iazyges, he took the title of Sarmaticus, in accordance with the Roman practice of victory titles.[52]

In 177, the Iazyges, the Buri, and other Germanic tribes[f] invaded Roman territory again.[53] It is said that in 178, Marcus Aurelius took the bloody spear from the Temple of Bellona, and hurled it into the land of the Iazyges.[54] In 179 the Iazyges and the Buri were defeated, and the Iazyges accepted peace with Rome. The peace treaty added to restrictions placed on the Iazyges, but also included some concessions. It stated that they could not settle on any of the islands of the Danube, and could not keep boats on the Danube; however, they were given the concession that they could visit and trade with the Roxolani throughout the Dacian Province with the knowledge and approval of its governor, and that they could trade in the Roman markets at certain times on certain days.[53] Because of the new concession allowing them to trade with the Roxolani they could, for the first time in several centuries, trade indirectly with the Pontic Steppe and the Black Sea.[55]

As part of a treaty made in 183, Commodus forbade the Quadi and the Marcomanni from waging war against the Iazyges, the Buri, or the Vandals, suggesting that at this time all three of them were loyal client tribes of Rome.[56][57]

the Goths captured the cities of Tyras and Olbia, in 260, which would have caused the Iazyges' trade with the Pontic Steppe and Black Sea to be cut off yet again.[58]

During the second century, some Roman cavalry came to adopt the Iazyges weaponry and equipment, such as their scale armor (made of iron, bronze, horn or horse hoof),[59][60] barding horses, and long two-handed lances called Contus.[61]

Late history and legacy[edit]

In late antiquity, historic accounts become much more diffuse, and the Iazyges generally cease to be mentioned as a tribe. In 358 it is recorded that the Iazyges were at war with Rome.[62] In the 4th century, two Sarmatian peoples were mentioned, the Argaragantes and the Limigantes, who lived on opposite sides of the Tisza river. These two tribes were formed when the Iazyges were conquered by the Roxolani, with the Iazyges becoming the Limigantes, and the Roxolani becoming the Argaragantes.[63] In the 5th century they were conquered by the Goths.[64]

Culture[edit]

Unlike the Sarmatians of the Eurasian Steppe who were largely nomadic, the Iazyges lived sedentary lifestyles and built, or at least lived in previously built, towns.[65] The language of the Iazyges, a dialect of Old Iranian, was very different from most of the other Sarmatian dialects of Old Iranian.[66] The Iazyges had similar burial rituals to the rest of the Sarmatians, in that they would bury them with gold, and Iron armor and weapons. During the time after the Iazyges migrated to the Tisza plain, and were in serious poverty, these burial rituals could no longer be continued, and most were buried simply. It is possible that the Iazyges substituted wood or bone armor and weapons for iron ones; However this theory can not be proven or disproven, because they would have rotted away.[18] The Iazyges used hanging barrel-shaped pots that were asymmetrical, and had uneven weight distribution. The rope to hang the pot was wrapped around the edges of the side collar, it is believed that the rope was tied tightly to the pot, allowing the pot to spin in circles, due to the spinning motion, several theories have been made of the use of the pots. It is believed that the smaller hanging pots were used to ferment alcohol, by use of the seeds of touch-me-not balsam (Impatiens noli-tangere), and the larger hanging pots were used to churn butter and make cheese.[67]

Geography[edit]

The area of plains between the Danube and Tisza rivers that was controlled by the Iazyges was similar in size to Italy, and about 1,000 mi (1,600 km) long.[68] The terrain was largely swampland that was devoid of any minable metals or minerals. This, alongside the problems the Romans would face in defending it, may explain why the Romans never annexed it into a province, but left it as a client-kingdom.[69]

Religion[edit]

One of the Iazygian towns, Bormanon, is believed to have had hot springs, because cities or town names starting with "Borm" were common among European tribes to denote that the location had hot springs. Hot springs held religious importance for many Celtic tribes; However, it is not known if the religious significance of the hot springs passed on to the Iazyges with the concept itself.[70]

List of kings[edit]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ They were also rarely called the Iazyigs, Iazygians, Iasians, or Yazigs.[4] Several corruptions of their names existed such as Jazamatae.[5]
  2. ^ Presumably around nine of them, because during this period nine legions were permanently stationed around the Danube.[29]
  3. ^ It was said by some Roman leaders, such as Quadratus, that it was crucial to the Romans that the Iazyges not join in on the Dacian side.[32]
  4. ^ The most likely reason that Marcus Aurelius offered more for him alive than dead is that he planned to parade him in a triumph, which was the standard Roman treatment of captured leaders.[44]
  5. ^ Cassius Dio claims that it was Marcus Aurelius that imprisoned Banadaspus, not the Iazyges.[49]
  6. ^ The only Germanic tribe that is named is the Buri, but there were more.[53]

Citations[edit]

  1. ^ Coppadoro 2010, p. 28.
  2. ^ Leisering 2004, pp. 26–27.
  3. ^ Smith 1873, p. 7.
  4. ^ Waldman & Mason 2006, p. 879.
  5. ^ Cook & Adcock 1965, p. 93.
  6. ^ Todd 2002, p. 60.
  7. ^ Map after Ptolemy's Geographia.
  8. ^ Ethno-Political map of ancient Eurasia.
  9. ^ McLynn 2010, p. 313.
  10. ^ Grumeza 2009, p. 40.
  11. ^ Maenchen-Helfen & Knight 1973, p. 448.
  12. ^ a b c Cunliffe 2015, p. 284.
  13. ^ Bunson 1995, p. 367.
  14. ^ Hildinger 2001, p. 50.
  15. ^ Hinds 2009, p. 71.
  16. ^ Mócsy 2014, p. 21.
  17. ^ Harmatta 1970, p. 42.
  18. ^ a b Harmatta 1970, pp. 43–45.
  19. ^ Johnston 1867, p. 28.
  20. ^ Malcor & Littleton 2013, p. 16.
  21. ^ a b c McLynn 2010, p. 314.
  22. ^ McLaughlin 2016, p. 147.
  23. ^ Mattingly 2010, p. 94.
  24. ^ a b Grainger 2004, p. 22.
  25. ^ Stuart Jones 1908, p. 143.
  26. ^ Jones 1993, p. 150.
  27. ^ Wellesley 2002, p. 133.
  28. ^ Ash & Wellesley 2009, p. 3.5.
  29. ^ a b c McLynn 2010, p. 315.
  30. ^ a b c Mócsy 2014, p. 94.
  31. ^ a b McLynn 2010, p. 319.
  32. ^ Corson 2003, p. 179.
  33. ^ Pop & Bolovan 2006, p. 98.
  34. ^ Mócsy 2014, p. 95.
  35. ^ McLynn 2010, p. 320.
  36. ^ Cichorius 1988, p. 269.
  37. ^ Mócsy 2014, p. 101.
  38. ^ Mócsy 2014, p. 100.
  39. ^ Grumeza 2009, p. 200.
  40. ^ Mócsy 2014, p. 187.
  41. ^ a b Mócsy 2014, p. 189.
  42. ^ a b c d e Mócsy 2014, p. 190.
  43. ^ Beckmann 2011, p. 198.
  44. ^ Beard 2009, p. 121.
  45. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 36.
  46. ^ McLaughlin 2016, p. 164.
  47. ^ Helmolt 1902, p. 444.
  48. ^ Erdkamp 2007, p. 1026.
  49. ^ Watson 1884, p. 211.
  50. ^ McLynn 2010, p. 360.
  51. ^ McLynn 2010, p. 368.
  52. ^ Loetscher & Jackson 1977, p. 175.
  53. ^ a b c Mócsy 2014, p. 191.
  54. ^ Ulanowski 2016, p. 362.
  55. ^ Harmatta 1970, pp. 45–47.
  56. ^ McLynn 2010, p. 423.
  57. ^ Merrills & Miles 2010, p. 28.
  58. ^ Harmatta 1970, pp. 47–48.
  59. ^ Hinds 2009, pp. 48–49.
  60. ^ Erdkamp 2007, p. 747.
  61. ^ McLaughlin 2016, p. 148.
  62. ^ Hornblower 2012, p. 723.
  63. ^ Constantinescu, Pascu & Diaconu 1975, p. 65.
  64. ^ Smith 1873, p. 8.
  65. ^ Constantinescu, Pascu & Diaconu 1975, p. 60.
  66. ^ Harmatta 1970, p. 96.
  67. ^ Views concerning barrel‑shaped vessels in the Sarmatian Iazyges environment.
  68. ^ Grainger 2004, p. 112.
  69. ^ McLynn 2010, p. 366.
  70. ^ Dowden 2013, p. 45.
  71. ^ Le Beau 1827, p. 44.

Primary sources[edit]

Modern sources[edit]

Books[edit]

  • Ash, Rhiannon; Wellesley, Kenneth (2009). The Histories (Rev. ed.). London: Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-194248-3. 
  • Beard, Mary (2009). The Roman triumph. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap. ISBN 978-0-674-02059-7. 
  • Beckmann, Martin (2011). Column of Marcus Aurelius the Genesis and Meaning of a Roman Imperial Monument. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-8078-7777-7. 
  • Bunson, Matthew (1995). A dictionary of the Roman Empire. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-510233-8. 
  • Bunson, Matthew (2002). Encyclopedia of the Roman Empire. New York: Facts On File. ISBN 978-1-4381-1027-1. 
  • Cichorius, Conrad (1988). Trajan's Column: A New Edition of the Chicorius Plates (New ed.). Gloucester: Sutton. ISBN 978-0-86299-467-9. 
  • Constantinescu, Miron; Pascu, Ștefan; Diaconu, Petre (1975). Relations Between the Autochthonous Population and the Migratory Populations on the Territory of Romania: A Collection of Studies. Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România. OCLC 928080934. 
  • Cook, S. A.; Adcock, Frank (1965). The Cambridge Ancient History: The Imperial peace, A.D. 70-192, 1965. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-05439-3. 
  • Coppadoro, John (2010). Antonio Maria Viani e la facciata di Palazzo Guerrieri a Mantova (in Italian). Firenze: Alinea. ISBN 978-88-6055-491-8. 
  • Corson, David (2003). Trajan and Plotina. New York. ISBN 978-0-595-28044-5. 
  • Cunliffe, Barry (2015). By Steppe, Desert, and Ocean: The Birth of Eurasia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-968917-0. 
  • Dowden, Ken (2013). European Paganism. Routledge. ISBN 9781134810222. 
  • Erdkamp, Paul (2007). A Companion to the Roman Army. Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4051-2153-8. 
  • Grainger, John D. (2004). Nerva and the Roman Succession Crisis of AD 96–99. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-34958-1. 
  • Grumeza, Ion (2009). Dacia: Land of Transylvania, Cornerstone of Ancient Eastern Europe. Lanham: Hamilton Books. ISBN 978-0-7618-4466-2. 
  • Halsall, Guy (2013). Worlds of Arthur: Facts and Fictions of the Dark Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-163271-6. 
  • Harmatta, J. (1970). Studies in the History and Language of the Sarmatians. Acta Universitatis de Attila József Nominatae. Acta antique et archaeologica. Szeged. OCLC 891848847. 
  • Helmolt, Hans Ferdinand (1902). The World's History: The Mediterranean nations. W. Heinemann. ISBN 978-1-154-10990-0. 
  • Hildinger, Erik (2001). Warriors of the Steppe: A Military History of Central Asia, 500 B.C. to 1700 A.D. Cambridge, Mass: Da Capo. ISBN 978-0-306-81065-7. 
  • Hinds, Kathryn (2009). Scythians and Sarmatians. Marshall Cavendish. ISBN 978-0-7614-4519-7. 
  • Hornblower, Simon (2012). The Oxford Classical Dictionary. (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-954556-8. 
  • Johnston, Alexander Keith (1867). School Atlas of Classical Geography: Comprising, in Twenty-three Plates. William Blackwood and Sons. ISBN 978-1-354-19788-2. 
  • Jones, Brian W. (1993). The Emperor Domitian (New ed.). London [u.a.]: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-10195-0. 
  • Stuart Jones, Henry (1908). The Roman Empire, B.C.29-A.D.476, Part 476. G.P. Putnam's Sons. ISBN 978-1-160-02354-2. 
  • Lacy, Norris J. (2006). A History of Arthurian Scholarship. Rochester, NY: D.S. Brewer. ISBN 978-1-84384-069-5. 
  • Le Beau, Charles (1827). Histoire du Bas-Empire (in French). Paris: Desaint [et] Saillant. ISBN 978-1-277-80289-4. 
  • Leisering, Walter (2004). Historischer Weltatlas (in German). Wiesbaden: Marix. pp. 26–27. ISBN 978-3-937715-59-9. 
  • Loetscher, Lefferts A.; Jackson, Samuel Macauley (1977). The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Book House. ISBN 978-0-8010-7947-4. 
  • Maenchen-Helfen, Otto J.; Knight, Max (1973). The World of the Huns: Studies in their History and Culture. Berkeley: University of California. ISBN 978-0-520-01596-8. 
  • Malcor, Linda A.; Littleton, C. Scott (2013). From Scythia to Camelot: A Radical Reassessment of the Legends of King Arthur, the Knights of the Round Table, and the Holy Grail. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. ISBN 978-1-317-77771-7. 
  • Mattingly, H. (2010). Agricola and Germania. UK: Penguin UK. ISBN 978-0-14-196154-5. 
  • McLaughlin, Raoul (2016). The Roman Empire and the Silk Routes: The Ancient World Economy and the Empires of Parthia, Central Asia and Han China. Casemate Publishers. ISBN 978-1-4738-8982-8. 
  • McLynn, Frank (2010). Marcus Aurelius: A Life. Da Capo Press. ISBN 978-0-306-81916-2. 
  • Merrills, Andy; Miles, Richard (2010). The Vandals. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-4443-1808-1. 
  • Miletić, Željko (2014). Lucius Artorius Castus and the King Arthur Legend. Split, Croatia: Matica Hrvatska. ISBN 978-953-163-401-4. 
  • Mócsy, András (Apr 8, 2014). Pannonia and Upper Moesia (Routledge Revivals): A History of the Middle Danube Provinces of the Roman Empire. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-75425-1. 
  • Pop, Ioan Aurel; Bolovan, Ioan (2006). History of Romania: Compendium. Cluj-Napoca: Romanian Cultural Institute. ISBN 978-973-7784-12-4. 
  • Smith, William (1873). Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography (2nd ed.). J. Murray. ISBN 978-1-84511-001-7. 
  • Todd, Malcolm (2002). Migrants & invaders: the movement of peoples in the ancient world. Brimscombe Port: Tempus. ISBN 978-0-7524-1437-9. 
  • Ulanowski, Krzysztof (2016). The Religious Aspects of War in the Ancient Near East, Greece, and Rome: Ancient Warfare Series (1st ed.). BRILL. ISBN 9789004324763. 
  • Waldman, Carl; Mason, Catherine (2006). Encyclopedia of European peoples (2nd ed.). New York: Facts On File. ISBN 978-0-8160-4964-6. 
  • Watson, Paul Barron (1884). Marcus Aurelius Antoninus. Harper & brothers. ISBN 978-1-290-23825-0. 
  • Wellesley, Kenneth (2002). Year of the Four Emperors. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-56227-5. 

Websites[edit]

Further reading[edit]

  • Bennett, Julian. (1997). Trajan: Optimus Princeps, Indianapolis University Press, Bloomington. ISBN 978-0-415-24150-2
  • Birley, Anthony. (1987). Marcus Aurelius: A Biography, Yale University Press, New Haven. ISBN 978-0-415-17125-0
  • Wikisource-logo.svg Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Iazyges". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.  OCLC 954463552
  • Christian, David. (1999). A History of Russia, Mongolia and Central Asia, Vol. 1. Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-631-20814-3
  • Kerr, William George. (1995). A Chronological Study of the Marcomannic Wars of Marcus Aurelius, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. OCLC 32861447
  • Kristó, Gyula. (1998). Magyarország története – 895–1301 (The History of Hungary – From 895 to 1301), Budapest: Osiris. ISBN 963-379-442-0.
  • Macartney, C.A. (1962). Hungary: A Short History, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. ISBN 978-0-00-612410-8
  • Peck, Harry Thurston. (1898). Harpers Dictionary of Classical Antiquities, New York. Harper and Brothers. ISBN 978-1-163-24933-8
  • Strayer, Joseph R., editor in chief. (1987). A Dictionary of the Middle Ages, Charles Scribner's Sons, NY. ISBN 978-0-684-80642-6
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Iazyges&oldid=761470064"