Jump to content

Super Bowl curse: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverting possible vandalism by 75.150.226.90 to version by 24.5.235.58. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot NG. (821944) (Bot)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Primary sources|date=November 2010}}
{{Primary sources|date=November 2010}}


The '''Super Bowl Curse''' is a phrase referring to [[Super Bowl]] participants that follow up with lower-than-expected performance the following year. Also called a '''Super Bowl hangover''', it has been used to explain both why losing teams may post below-average winning percentages in the following year and why Super Bowl champions seldom return to the Super Bowl the following year. The term has been used since at least 1992, when ''[[The Washington Post]]'' commented that "[t]he Super Bowl Curse has thrown everything it's got at the Washington Redskins. The Jinx that has bedeviled defending champs for 15 years has never been in better form".<ref>Boswell, Thomas. (September 21, 1992) "A Curse but not yet a sin" (article sample at [http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1026095.html highbeam.com]). ''The Washington Post''.</ref> The phenomenon is attributed by football commentator and former NFL manager [[Charley Casserly]] to such elements as "a shorter offseason, contract issues, [and] more demand for your players' time".<ref name="USA">Gruber, Jack. (February 6, 2007).The Buffalo Bills are not afffected in 1993.Even though they lost to the Dallas Cowboys,They again made it to the Super Bowl.But lost again. [http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/2007-02-07-sw-cover-super-bowl_x.htm Champions, for now — Super Bowl curse could vex Colts, Bears]. ''USA Today''. Retrieved 19/04/08.</ref> Casserly also notes that "once the season starts, you become the biggest game on everybody's schedule."<ref name="USA"/>
The '''Super Bowl Curse''' is a phrase referring to [[Super Bowl]] participants that follow up with lower-than-expected performance the following year. Also called a '''Super Bowl hangover''', it has been used to explain both why losing teams may post below-average winning percentages in the following year and why Super Bowl champions seldom return to the Super Bowl the following year. The term has been used since at least 1992, when ''[[The Washington Post]]'' commented that "[t]he Super Bowl Curse has thrown everything it's got at the Washington Redskins. The Jinx that has bedeviled defending champs for 15 years has never been in better form".<ref>Boswell, Thomas. (September 21, 1992) "A Curse but not yet a sin" (article sample at [http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1026095.html highbeam.com]). ''The Washington Post''.</ref> The phenomenon is attributed by football commentator and former NFL manager [[Charley Casserly]] to such elements as "a shorter offseason, contract issues, [and] more demand for your players' time".<ref name="USA">Gruber, Jack. (February 6, 2007).The Buffalo Bills are not afffected in 1993.Even though they lost to the Dallas Cowboys,They again made it to the Super Bowl.But lost again. [http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/2007-02-07-sw-cover-super-bowl_x.htm Champions, for now — Super Bowl curse could vex Colts, Bears]. ''USA Today''. Retrieved 19/04/08.</ref> Casserly also notes that "once the season starts, you become the biggest game on everybody's schedule." This applied to the [[Green Bay Packers]] because they lost to the [[New York Giants]] on January 15, 2012. Yaayyyyyy!!!!!! Take that Aaron Rogers!!! <ref name="USA"/>


==Recent observations==
==Recent observations==

Revision as of 20:12, 17 January 2012

The Super Bowl Curse is a phrase referring to Super Bowl participants that follow up with lower-than-expected performance the following year. Also called a Super Bowl hangover, it has been used to explain both why losing teams may post below-average winning percentages in the following year and why Super Bowl champions seldom return to the Super Bowl the following year. The term has been used since at least 1992, when The Washington Post commented that "[t]he Super Bowl Curse has thrown everything it's got at the Washington Redskins. The Jinx that has bedeviled defending champs for 15 years has never been in better form".[1] The phenomenon is attributed by football commentator and former NFL manager Charley Casserly to such elements as "a shorter offseason, contract issues, [and] more demand for your players' time".[2] Casserly also notes that "once the season starts, you become the biggest game on everybody's schedule." This applied to the Green Bay Packers because they lost to the New York Giants on January 15, 2012. Yaayyyyyy!!!!!! Take that Aaron Rogers!!! [2]

Recent observations

While the first five Super Bowl winners of the 2000s posted above average winning percentages the year following their Super Bowl appearance, the losers of the same games posted below average winning percentages in the follow-up year.[3] The Super Bowl curse is also said to apply to winners of the game, as since 1993 few winning teams have followed up their Super Bowl successes with a second Super Bowl appearance (Denver Broncos, Dallas Cowboys and New England Patriots won; Green Bay Packers lost) or even advanced to a conference title game in the subsequent season (Dallas Cowboys). In the Super Bowl era two teams have lost the Super Bowl, then won it the following season. The first was the Dallas Cowboys, who lost Super Bowl V to the Baltimore Colts, but came back in 1971 and defeated the Miami Dolphins in Super Bowl VI. The Dolphins repeated the feat in 1972 when they rallied to go a perfect 17-0, capping the season with a win over the Washington Redskins in Super Bowl VII.

Losing teams mentioned in connection to the curse

Super Bowl losing teams who went on to poor follow-up performance include:[3]

Exceptions

There have been several exceptions since this curse supposedly began in 1977.

  • Indianapolis Colts. (Super Bowl XLIV). 2009 season: 14-2. In the 2010 season they went 10-6 and won the AFC South for the seventh time in eight years, however it was the first time in 9 years that the Colts had finished a season with less than 12 wins. They lost in the wild card playoffs to the New York Jets. The following season however, without Peyton Manning, they did experience a significant drop. They started the season 0-13, and finished 2-14, the first time out of the playoffs since 2001.
  • New England Patriots. (Super Bowl XLII). 2007 season: 16-0. After having the first perfect season in the 16-game schedule, in the 2008 season they went 11-5 and missed the playoffs barely by losing tiebreakers with Miami in their division and Baltimore for the wild card. The "Super Bowl curse" took a different road, since their starting quarterback, Tom Brady, suffered a season ending injury in the opening game of the season.

Further reading

  • "Credit Belichick for beating Super Bowl curse". The Sacramento Bee. October 25, 2006. pp. C3.
  • Freeman, Mike (December 12, 1991). "Fans cry: Off with Giants' Head (Coach)!". The Washington Post.
  • Green Jr., Ron (November 5, 2004). "Lost-the-Super-Bowl blues afflict Panthers, Raiders". The Charlotte Observer. pp. 2C.
  • "Less and more than rumored Miami and the Super Bowl curse". Sarasota Herald Tribune. January 30, 1999.
  • Penner, Mike (August 27, 2006). "Curses are reality to fantasy leaguers". Los Angeles Times. pp. D.2.

References

  1. ^ Boswell, Thomas. (September 21, 1992) "A Curse but not yet a sin" (article sample at highbeam.com). The Washington Post.
  2. ^ a b Gruber, Jack. (February 6, 2007).The Buffalo Bills are not afffected in 1993.Even though they lost to the Dallas Cowboys,They again made it to the Super Bowl.But lost again. Champions, for now — Super Bowl curse could vex Colts, Bears. USA Today. Retrieved 19/04/08.
  3. ^ a b Simpson, Matt. (September 17, 2006) Seattle out to break Super Bowl curse. "Tribune". Retrieved 19/04/08.
  4. ^ Ken Belson (February 1, 2010). "Is the Super Bowl curse real? Just ask Brady, Alexander and others". NFL.com.