This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Material from the associated project or article page was split to 2009 flu pandemic table April 2009 on 17:17 1 July 2009. The page history of the associated project or article page now serves as the attribution history for part of the contents of that page.
Material from the associated project or article page was split to 2009 flu pandemic table May 2009 on 17:17 1 July 2009. The page history of the associated project or article page now serves as the attribution history for part of the contents of that page.
Material from the associated project or article page was split to 2009 flu pandemic table June 2009 on 17:17 1 July 2009. The page history of the associated project or article page now serves as the attribution history for part of the contents of that page.
Material from the associated project or article page was split to 2009 flu pandemic table July 2009 on 17:17 1 July 2009. The page history of the associated project or article page now serves as the attribution history for part of the contents of that page.
The graph looks nice, but the tables have data for over 80 countries now - 80 graphs would be too much. Plus, you couldn't compare the situation on a given day between countries easily. I still hold out hope that there is a more compact way to show this data somehow, though.Anguswalker (talk) 16:00, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
you could just do a sum total of all cases reported to the WHO as a perdiem graph. The figures area already here for "the world". 18.104.22.168 (talk) 04:09, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
As the original author of this page, I naturally do not wish to see it deleted. I accept that it contains a lot of information, but I think it is well organised and easy to understand. It provides all the information in the WHO updates in a single digestible table, allowing users to see the development of swine flu in each country and continent, which is not possible anywhere else, as far as I know. Anguswalker (talk) 22:38, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
It still fails WP:NOT#STATS. The collection of information isn't needed on Wikipedia. We have tables that display the spread of the swine flu in a much better fashion than raw stats on a table. Douglasr007 (talk) 17:39, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
I don't think it fails WP:NOT#STATS, which states 'Long and sprawling lists of statistics may be confusing to readers and reduce the readability and neatness of our articles.' First of all this is long but I don't think it is 'sprawling', which suggests lots of disparate information stuck together without much cohesion or rationale. Secondly, note the 'may', which suggests that something can be long (and even sprawling) without confusing readers and reducing readability - I would argue that this table is an example, comparable with this page on South American World Cup matches, say. Thirdly you say that there are tables and graphs that display the spread of swine flu in better fashion, but they do not provide this detail. I maintain that even after the pandemic is over, this will be a useful historical record which may not be available elsewhere.
Finally, I am a relevant newcomer to Wikipedia but if articles were assessed on the basis of 'need', there would be a lot of other articles before this one in the queue! I am open to suggestions as to how to present this information in a clearer way, but maintain that having it in some form is worthwhile both now and in the future.Anguswalker (talk) 11:17, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
This is excellent data. Perhaps there are other wikipedia guidelines that apply such as common sense. Thanks, Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 17:51, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
this page does NOT fail wp:notstats,because it is not sprawling,nor does it confuse users,i feel that it is very important that we,at least in some form,mantain this article.22.214.171.124 (talk) 14:58, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I am a member of WikiProject Medicine, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of medicine. Since your article has fallen under our scope, I have placed the correct template(s) on this talk page for verification. Upon reviewed of the article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown below:
Assess article with class and importance factors
Leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee(talk) 04:52, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
How did one person in the U.S. come back to life between the previous report and today? 45 dead on June 15, only 44 on June 17? Edison (talk) 18:42, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Sadly not a resurrection, but a change of mind as to the cause of death (as WHO puts it: *The data has been revised on the basis of further laboratory confirmation"). I suppose that could still mean resurrection but I'm sticking to my theory.Anguswalker (talk) 07:33, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
World health organization information unupdated
World health organization information unupdated. We should not use it. We could also use maps to show the spread. It would be easier to understand.Sampsonkwan (talk) 06:33, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
I don't quite understand what you mean by 'unupdated'. The BBC news site has a good map with a slider, but I don't know how to do this on wikipedia.Anguswalker (talk) 16:11, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
We can make a sequence of maps showing the spread of swine flu using colours to mark the number of cases.Sampsonkwan (talk) 11:22, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
I mean by 'unupdated' that the WHO update bulletins are updated rarely and not accurate. I understand it will be very hard not to use the WHO update bullentins.Sampsonkwan (talk) 11:22, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Once every two days is hardly 'rarely'. I agree, though, that their figures are generally slightly behind others, but they are probably the most reliable. Anguswalker (talk) 11:10, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Please do not update the page with figures found anywhere except the World Health Organisation updates. I know it is tempting to put higher figures in, but please resist! Anguswalker (talk) 08:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Are the numbers cumulative (e.g. do the numbers for a certain month include the numbers from the previous months) or are they for the month in the head only? This could be clarified by including it in the headings. 126.96.36.199 (talk) 11:14, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
We can show how swine flu is spreading by showing a sequence of maps using coler codes to show the number of cases comfirmed. I don't know how you can create a map though. Can anyone tell me how to make a map?Sampsonkwan (talk) 03:43, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
You can download the SVG maps used in the by country article and look at the code. They're actually text files with the extension SVG. (be sure to download the SVG file, and not the PNG cache version) 188.8.131.52 (talk) 05:36, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
With the arrival of July, this page became too long, with eight tables some with over 20 columns and 100 rows.
What I have therefore done is to put each case and death table on their own 'month' page, and retain this page as a longer-term summary of the progress of the pandemic, by listing the cases and deaths from the first WHO update each month, plus the latest update.
Please let me know what you think!Anguswalker (talk) 10:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
This is not really about this article but it is a call for help on a related article, influenza prevention. My hope is to eventually have this article put into the "In the News" section, but it does not yet have appropriate content nor is it of high enough quality. I would like a consensus for this article and experienced editors to improve it. Any helpful edits to this article are greatly beneficial. Thank you. Sagan666 (talk) 00:10, 3 September 2009 (UTC)