Talk:Aleksa Marković (Canadian soccer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 23 April 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 17:33, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


– Same spellings. Currently only a discritic on the C different. However, I noticed the German wikipedia and soccerway spell the Austrian player with the diacritic. Alternatives are Aleksa Marković (soccer, born 1997) and Aleksa Marković (footballer, born 2001) RedPatch (talk) 12:48, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. RedPatch (talk) 12:48, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support disambiguating 2st since the Canadian one gets more views (50) than the Austrian one (11)[[1]] and most English readers won't type diacritics. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:38, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per WP:SMALLDETAILS, both names are extremely close to one another which might make people go to the wrong page should one or both becomes more notable. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 10:20, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support moving to year of birth, standard disambiguation given nationality is fluid. GiantSnowman 16:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom, and there should be a DAB at base name.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom, and there should be a DAB at base name. Interesting that we allow ć for Canadians and Austrians to express their ć origins, but there's one living Serbian sportswoman who is forever denied her real name ć on English wikipedia. Can any of those participating in this RM explain that? In ictu oculi (talk) 07:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.