Jump to content

Talk:Ana de Armas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Citizenship

[edit]

Just announced on the April 15, 2023 episode of Saturday Night Live: de Armas will receive U.S. citizenship c. May 1, 2023. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 03:42, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An SNL episode is a bit hard to use as a reference even with the required time stamp and it talks about plans. Hopefully something will be written about it in a reliable source after it happens so we have a source that can be more easily verified. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:57, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's been over a month since she claimed this, is there any updates as to her citizenship status? Clear Looking Glass (talk) 18:40, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Early life

[edit]

What is the point of saying she had no internet access when she was young when that statement applies to 95 percent of the world population? Even in the USA, people born before 1985 did NOT have internet and few at her age 2603:6011:3201:DE20:B0E:7315:8CAD:BC68 (talk) 12:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just because an actor says something doesn't mean it has value. In fact, she was 19 years old when most children in the USA finally had internet access. Still today, more than one-third of tte world has no Internet access. So what is the meaning or value in having this statement on her Wiki page? 2603:6011:3201:DE20:B0E:7315:8CAD:BC68 (talk) 12:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The key point being made is "had limited knowledge of popular culture beyond Cuba" with some info as to why. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Most everyone has limited knowledge of culture beyond wherever they are living 2603:6011:3201:DE20:C51D:720D:2B57:4DE6 (talk) 17:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's useless information. She is not deprived of anything that the majority of people have not been deprived since the existence of man and knowledge 2603:6011:3201:DE20:C51D:720D:2B57:4DE6 (talk) 17:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is discussing her background. Irrelevant if other people have the same problems that she did or her problems is not uncommon. It gives understanding of her, which is the point and thus adds value to the article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
your a flake 2603:6011:3201:DE20:6505:C589:FA22:EFFB (talk) 03:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox image

[edit]

Infobox images are generally focussed on a person's upper body, to identify the subject. Reverting with edit summaries such as "Less boobs, more focus ;)" is not helpful. Would you closely crop Harry Styles's infobox image to a creepy crop of his face for showing "too much skin", Mithoron? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had noticed the edit warring so I've fully protected the page for two days until you folks reach consensus. If in the meantime you do come to an agreement, come to me or any other admin at WP:RFPP to reduce the protection level. BusterD (talk) 11:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]