Jump to content

Talk:Cannabis in Uruguay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

North Korea?

[edit]

Why is Uruguay considered the "first country" to legalize all this? Isn't cannabis completely legal in North Korea? [Soffredo] Journeyman Editor 22:59, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. I think it's because North Korea does not consider cannabis a drug. The fact that the whole chain of cultivation, sell, and consumption went from illegal to legal in Uruguay makes it a first time event. ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 02:03, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move per request.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:10, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Legality of cannabis in Uruguay → Cannabis in Uruguay – "Legality of" is too precise, and there are no other articles of the proposed name. George Ho (talk) 22:18, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

International reaction.

[edit]

The UN declaring the move "illegal" strikes me as notable enough to be included, along with some more details of international reaction. I would do it myself but am not really well-versed in this kind of international affairs stuff and am likely to show my ignorance. 75.156.68.21 (talk) 07:03, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What this refers to is 'breaching' the conventions that exist for drug control/prohibition. The conventions are 'enforced' by suborganisations of the World Health Organisation (WHO), all based in Vienna. All countries who have ratified the Conventions (probably all who are members of the WHO) have to report annually that all is well with prohibition. This explains the contradiction between State laws in the US (some decriminalisation) and US federal law that saw State-legal outlets raided by Federal agents. It doesn't seem to be enforced strictly at the moment, but could be again at any time.
If you think that these conventions are international law which can never be modified, then obviously Uruguay is acting illegally. If you think a country must be able to use her sovereignty to write laws that suit the country, then Uruguay is non-compliant which you could call illegal, although it is a long time that someone voted for these international conventions and laws. With the bar hung so high, i.e. in practice impossibility of change to such conventions, Uruguay's laws are legitimate, I guess, but still illegal under international 'law'. It could well mean that a country would be kicked out of the WHO or the whole of the UN if such a convention is breached, but one-way roads are not acceptable (to most of us). Someone should verify if the WHO really does kick you out if you rebel against one of their conventions. North Korea is outside the international organisations and can do what they like. The organisations in Vienna who manage governments adhering to the conventions are:
INCB (International Narcotis Control Board, www.incb.org), 'the independent and quasi-judicial organ monitoring the implementation of the United Nations drug control conventions'
UNFDAC = United Nations Fund for Drug Abuse Control

http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/drug-prevention-and-treatment/index.html = UN Office on drugs and crime

ICDAIT = International Conference on Drug Abuse and illegal trafficking

144.136.192.79 (talk) 04:44, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

North Korea

[edit]

That country's not banning cannabis has no relevance to this article, let alone in its opening (which should be a summary of the contents). The sentence where it had been inserted talked about Uruguay legalizing cannabis but N Korea has never legalized cannabis so I have removed the material and reference. We need to stay on topic in this article♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 14:27, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

>> Managing marijuana in Uruguay(Lihaas (talk) 12:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cannabis in Uruguay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cannabis_in_Uruguay&oldid=1206532127"