Talk:Charles Lennox Richardson

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Japan: Biography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 00:08, November 4, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Biography task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Untitled

Saying that Richardson was "murdered" seems to imply judgment against the Satsuma bushi... I think "killed" is more neutral.. Tallasse 00:13, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If all documents have him listed has Charles Lenox Richardson why the different spelling here? Especially as other websites are taking wikipedia's lead on this one.

Requested move 20 March 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn. George Ho (talk) 02:40, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Lennox Richardson → Death of Charles Lennox Richardson – Somehow, the death of the British merchant is more notable than the merchant himself. According to the article, the merchant risked his life for trade and got killed by the gang of samurai. ...Sounds like a notable death to me. Of course, article needs improvements and layout changes. Even "Reception" section does not make the merchant as notable as his death. George Ho (talk) 20:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC) --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 02:24, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – We don't normally include what a person is notable for in the article title. Dicklyon (talk) 04:50, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – This is a biography specific to a single person. Events specific to his death are already covered in Namamugi incident.--MChew (talk) 05:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dicklyon. SnowFire (talk) 20:24, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Folker Reichert

Is there really no better source (upon which so much content of this article appears to rely) than a German-language article that isn't available online from the looks of it? Even if it is the best source available, there ought to be others with at least something to say about Richardson and the situation. As it stands, the article gives nothing but Folker Reichert's view, with its accusations of arrogance etc, supported by appropriate statements from Richardson's uncle and the British Envoy to China, whereas I'm sure others at the time had their own views, not represented here; this therefore doesn't really seem balanced. Of course it's entirely plausible Richardson's arrogance was solely to blame; it would however be of value to have other sources and information included in this article, to my mind. I don't mean to suggest Folker Reichert's perspective and research are unqualified by any means (he has a German Wikipedia article even if not one here, which displays his academic positions at Yokohama University and Shanghai), merely that other authors might also have had something of worth to contribute here, maybe giving a more rounded view of things than what seems to boil down simply to 'Richardson was a boor; he deserved to be killed'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.2.120.87 (talk) 21:59, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions of arrogance

There are no eyewitness accounts from Clark nor Marshall that claimed he said, "he knows how to manage these people". The article by Paul Martin in Japan Forward Sept 11, 2021, suggests that the incident occurred most likely due to lack of knowledge of the customs in Japan and didn't know the language and they fell into the situation by accident. The article also states that "Richardson being arrogant and purposely antagonizing the procession...appear to be unfounded" and also letters from Richardson to his family make him out to be "incredibly dutiful son and brother. He had been fined for an altercation he had with a Chinese servant while in China, but it appears to have been a solitary incident in which he took full responsibility insisting that the servant had been "insolent"."

Clear the man's name, the anniversary is tomorrow 14Sept2023, 161 yrs ago. 63.97.36.15 (talk) 06:42, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]