Talk:Doki Doki Majo Shinpan!
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Criticism section
[edit]This article needs a criticism section. The contents should include something about the controversy of lolicon in the video game.--Coolkid602006 02:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's rated C, which is non-adult. A lot of the "controversy" as I've seen it were from edits of the screenshots from 2ch. Suggest some 1st party sources and someone will write that in I'm sure. (Perhaps it would be best to wait until the game actually comes out and the content verifiable before discussing whether that content is loli or not, eh?) 65.3.197.248 06:56, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- IT HAS THE PLAYER TOUCH UNDERAGE BUSTY GIRLS TO MAKE THEIR BOOBS BOUNCE! IN THE OFFICIAL TRAILER! http://kotaku.com/gaming/clip/full-doki-doki-majo-shinpan-trailer-274512.php If there isn't controversy now, there WILL be. What would happen if Jack Thompson got his hands on this game?
- Obviously if there is consensus for it, scandal should be in the article, but the content is certainly out of proportion with respect to the famous DOA bounce, for instance. My concern with putting a whole section of loli/pedo stuff is that it's a highly charged topic in a game that really isn't a "pedophilia simulator". The big question is whether there IS there a true, legitimate, verifiable scandal? And Jack Thompson is irrelevant especially as far as this game is concerned since it's not a US released game and he has no political pull in Japan. Applekid 00:02, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Do we even have any references or evidence of there being a scandal? It's not a hentai game, even if it pulls its inspiration from flash games that are. An English release probably would earn a scandal, but except from the existence of an Engrish version of the website I don't see any hints of that either. --tjstrf talk 00:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Obviously if there is consensus for it, scandal should be in the article, but the content is certainly out of proportion with respect to the famous DOA bounce, for instance. My concern with putting a whole section of loli/pedo stuff is that it's a highly charged topic in a game that really isn't a "pedophilia simulator". The big question is whether there IS there a true, legitimate, verifiable scandal? And Jack Thompson is irrelevant especially as far as this game is concerned since it's not a US released game and he has no political pull in Japan. Applekid 00:02, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- IT HAS THE PLAYER TOUCH UNDERAGE BUSTY GIRLS TO MAKE THEIR BOOBS BOUNCE! IN THE OFFICIAL TRAILER! http://kotaku.com/gaming/clip/full-doki-doki-majo-shinpan-trailer-274512.php If there isn't controversy now, there WILL be. What would happen if Jack Thompson got his hands on this game?
This has got to be the single most perverted and sick game I have ever heard of. 24.124.88.11 (talk) 03:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- I concur with tjstrf: It doesn´t matter how twisted/perverted/sick the game could be, as long as it does not hit the western market it won´t cause a scandal, until that or that we can find any fact, we only would be making suppositions about such. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.23.91.242 (talk) 17:56, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
24.124.88.11, you obviously haven't heard of many games. Look at hentai games for example. This is nothing compared to them.69.117.174.65 (talk) 16:05, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
US
[edit]There is mention in the article about this game being released in the United States. Why any there America-related statements need to be in here? Wouldn't it be better say that this game isn't and won't be released outside Japan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.217.18.238 (talk) 15:45, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Doki Doki Majo Shinpan!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071112042341/http://kotaku.com/gaming/ds-lite/no-plans-to-localize-doki-doki-majo-shinpan-280089.php to http://kotaku.com/gaming/ds-lite/no-plans-to-localize-doki-doki-majo-shinpan-280089.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071120105014/http://kotaku.com/gaming/king-of-touchers/snks-witch-game-more-popular-than-phantom-hourglass-257674.php to http://kotaku.com/gaming/king-of-touchers/snks-witch-game-more-popular-than-phantom-hourglass-257674.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:33, 12 September 2017 (UTC)