Jump to content

Talk:Donté Stallworth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mike Vick Was Worse

[edit]

That sounds more like opinion, but I cant remove it. Any ideas? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.205.80.147 (talk) 16:24, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Manslaughter Chargers

[edit]

"Stallworth admitted to drinking the night prior to the accident" - That reads as if he had been drinking the night before, should perhaps be "Stallworth admitted to drinking that night, prior to the accident", or something along those lines. Tvon (talk) 04:00, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOFIXIT, it's not protected. Eagles 24/7 (C)

40-yard dash time

[edit]

"He is reputed to have run a 4.18 40 Time at the combine while tripping." ... yeah, that's bollocks. where's a citation for that? that would be one of the fastest recorded times ever. doesn't belong here.

Agreed. I've taken it out. Parliament of Owls 23:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
From what I can find, he ran a 4.48 at the combine and a 4.26 at his Pro Day. --67.165.6.76 07:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That would be difficult, as he did not work out at the Combine (like most other top receivers). At his Pro Day, he ran a 4.22-4.26. Kansas City timed it at 4.18. [1]. Hopefully anyone who goes to change this page will actually read this, as since 2002, the idea that Stallworth worked out at the Combine continually seems to float around. He didn't.

128.146.33.6 17:06, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does anybody know if he is related to legendary Steelers receiver John Stallworth?

Name

[edit]

He seems to identify himself a Donte' and not Donté. See his twitter account or mentions on nfl.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.51.222.27 (talk) 03:39, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They are not related. --67.165.6.76 07:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot (talk) 18:48, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Donté Stallworth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Donté Stallworth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:56, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Donté Stallworth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion

[edit]

Hi, Eagles247. Regarding your recent reversion, to what provision of the MOS are you referring? 142.160.89.97 (talk) 05:36, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@142.160.89.97: specifically MOS:OPENPARABIO which details that the full birthdate should be shown in the lead paragraph, not just the year. Washington, D.C. should also not be changed to Washington, DC, since that’s the name of the article. Thanks! Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:35, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Eagles247: Where specifically in MOS:OPENPARABIO does it day that the full birth date is required in the lead? What I'm reading is that "the vital year range (in brackets after the person's full name) may be sufficient to provide context".
Additionally, your edit:
  • Converted numbers written in words to numerals in contravention of MOS:NUMERAL
  • Removed a comma in contravention of MOS:GEOCOMMA
  • Removed the subject's date of birth from the body of the article
  • Moved a comma that followed a quotation to fall within the quotation marks despite the comma not having been part of work quoted in contravention of MOS:LQ
Why is that? 142.160.89.97 (talk) 03:47, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@142.160.89.97: MOS:OPENPARABIO states "The opening paragraph should usually have dates of birth and (when applicable) death" (emphasis mine), and "should" is a stronger than "may be sufficient", especially when every single NFL player biography uses the same format. Since the date of birth is mentioned in the lead, MOS:OPENPARABIO states the date of birth should not be referenced again. I've added back the comma, converted back the numbers, and moved the comma back outside of the quotation marks. Eagles 24/7 (C) 12:51, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Eagles247: MOS:OPENPARABIO states the date of birth should not be referenced again. Maybe I'm missing something, but where does it say that?
MOS:OPENPARABIO states "The opening paragraph should usually have dates of birth and (when applicable) death" (emphasis mine), and "should" is a stronger than "may be sufficient", especially when every single NFL player biography uses the same format. If we were, for the sake of argument, to accept your interpretation, are there any conceivable cases where the vital year range would be "sufficient to provide context"? 142.160.89.97 (talk) 20:09, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Dante' stallworth" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Dante' stallworth has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 23 § Dante' stallworth until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:37, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Donté_Stallworth&oldid=1230595839"