|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ernest Renan article.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
|This article has an assessment summary page.|
Vie de Jesus
Amazing -- this doesn't mention his bestselling "Vie de Jesus." Not my field or period (or preference) so I won't put it in .—Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk • contribs) 23:05, 22 November 2003
I have at least put it in, but this page still needs masses of work, and lets down an interesting chap -- Rob
Siblings of Celebrities
Henriette had accepted in the family of Count Zamoyski an engagement more lucrative than her former place. She exercised the strongest influence over her brother, and her published letters reveal a mind almost equal, a moral nature superior, to his own.
Where can one find her published letters? And do you know more on this Count Zamoyski: full name,marital status,position,and duration of association with Henriette Renan?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk • contribs) 08:56, 26 February 2004
On Daniel and the Apocrypha
This entry claims that Renan called the book of Daniel apocryphal. This is preposterous since "apocryphal" means "not in the canon" -- and Daniel is certainly in the canon of scripture for both Christians and Jews. I looked up original entry in the 1911 Britannica, and I noticed that the error began there. Be that as it may, I changed the entry here in Wikipedia, assuming that a clear and correct meaning is more important than being loyal to the 1911 Britannica. Perhaps Renan argued that the book of Daniel ought to be apocryphal; I don't know. I do know that he made a case in the Vie de Jésus that Daniel is a very late book, a view with which modern Biblical scholars agree. --Hapax 21:15, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- according to wikipedia: Apocraphy "are texts of uncertain authenticity or writings where the authorship is questioned."--Dwarf Kirlston 13:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
"He did indeed write that if "the essential element of a nation is that all its individuals must have many things in common," they "must also have forgotten many things. Every French citizen must have forgotten the night of St. Bartholomew and the massacres in the 13th century in the South.""
Date of death
Vital dates - revisited
It's both his vital dates that show discrepancies. I've done a quick survey of Renan's articles in other languages and these are the results:
- born 27 February, died 2 October: Czech, German, Latin, Slovenian
- born 27 February, died 12 October: Spanish
- born 28 February, died 2 October: Esperanto, French, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian
- born 28 February, died 12 October: English, Dutch, Swedish, Turkish
- born 27 or 28 February, died 12 October: Bulgarian
- born 23 February, died 2 October: Welsh.
I haven't checked any of the talk pages, but not a single one of these articles makes any reference to the fact that his vital dates seem to be a matter of opinion rather than of fact.
- October 2. Henry Brewster mentioned his death in a letter of October 9 1872. "...when Renan died in 1892 Brewster mourned his passing as follows: "Renan's death is the loss of a friend to me. I rejoiced to see him honoured. I think he is the only man to whom I owe the debt of intellectual gratitude one owes one's master." (Letter to Ethel Smyth dated October 9, 1892)" From Martin Halpern, Henry B. Brewster (1850-1908): An Introduction, in American Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 3 (Autumn, 1962), pp. 464-482
- He definitely died on October 2. Renan's early biographer William Francis Barry says he was born on 27th Feb (p.4) . However, Lewis Freeman gives evidence that he was born on the 28th, since the birth certificate is reproduced in Théophile Janvrais' Ernest Renan en Bretagne. There is also a letter sent by his sister on his birthday, which is dated 28th. For some unknown reason Renan apparently sometimes told people his birthday was the 27th, and that date appeared in some early biographies. Paul B (talk) 21:56, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
This random quote qwas added without source: "We aspire not to equality but to domination. The country of a foreign race must again be a country of serfs, of agricultural laborers or industrial workers. It is not a question of eliminating the inequalities among men but of broadening them and making them law." I think it's from Caliban, but we need to source it. Paul B (talk) 15:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)