Talk:Ferdinand II of Aragon
|Ferdinand II of Aragon has been listed as a level-4 vital article in People. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as B-Class.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
|A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day... section on October 17, 2004, October 19, 2005, October 19, 2006, October 19, 2007, October 19, 2008, October 19, 2009, October 19, 2010, October 19, 2013, and October 19, 2015.|
Was he king of Castile? I didn't think so. Wetman 02:37, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Why is he in Category:Arabbljhvljhvljhvljhvljhvljhvljhvljhvljhvljhvlhgl? --Saforrest 23:53, Nov 10, 2004 (UTC)
"When Ferdinand succeeded his father as King of Aragon in 1479, the Crown of Castile and the various territories of the Crown of Aragon were united in a personal union creating for the first time since the 8th century a single political unit which might be called Spain, although the various territories were not properly administered as a single unit until the 18th century"
Reading this one might assume there was a single political unit (Spain) before the 8th century, which is not true. Besides that, Granada was a muslim kingdom until 1492 and Navarre wasn't annexed until 1512, so there was no such thing as Spain in 1479. And about if he was king of Castille, Isabella was the ruler of Castille, but he was regent during several periods of time.
"...Spain the most powerful state in Italy"? Was this intentional? Should it read "most powerful state in Europe", or was France more powerful at the time? ThePedanticPrick 13:28, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
The Date of Death?
AFAIS, Spanish Wiki states Ferdinand's death date as the 23rd of January, while in English Wiki it is the 23rd of June. Can someone more familiar with the subject check the date of death of Ferdinand II?
How do you get more info on him?
Was he king regnant of Castillia?
Or only King consort while Isabella was the sole ruler, and regent for Juana the Mad after Isabella's death?--Nitsansh 01:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- He was counted as co-monarch of Castile with Isabella (in those days a king consort was often made regnant). He's included in the Castilian numeration as Ferdinand V. Jess Cully 08:04, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- The testament of Queen Isabella declared him regent in case that his daughter Juana wasn't able to govern. As Juana was declared insane after Philip the Handsome's death, Ferdinand was made co-king and appeared as such in the Castilian currency coigned after 1506, but in essence he was full king as Juana was imprisoned in Tordesillas. His position was never discussed, and he was considered and treated as king of Castile till his death in 1516, so it's not a surprise his successors counted him as Ferdinand V of Castile. In conclusion, it should be perfectly right to say that Ferdinand was Ferdinando I di Sicilia from 1469, Fernando, rey consorte de Castilla between 1474 and 1504, Ferrando II d'Aragón from 1474, Ferdinando III di Napoli from 1504 and Fernando V de Castilla from 1506. He is usually named "Ferdinand II" in all languages, though.--Menah the Great 22:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Big scale vandalism
The article has been a victim of repeated vandalism, to the point it is difficult to say in which version it started. Somebody should correct it, please.--Menah the Great 22:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure but I think the translations from English to those other types of Spanish are incorrect. I know the English-Spanish translation was wrong, so I fixed that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 03:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Ferdinand never claimed the title Emperor of the Romans
How was he succeeded immediately by his grandson when his daughter was still alive? Did he state in a will that he wanted Aragon to go straight to Charles, skipping Joana? Emperor001 (talk) 20:23, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- You should see Talk:Joanna of Castile#Joanna was Queen of Aragon. Some people claim that Ferdinand was indeed succeeded by his eldest surviving daughter, while others say that Ferdinand was succeeded by his daughter's son since Salic law forbade women to inherit the Aragonese crown. Even if Ferdinand was succeeded by Joanna, she certainly co-reigned with her son and he was de facto ruler of her dominions because of her mental illness. Surtsicna (talk) 21:09, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Totally false the thing of de illegitimate son with Luisa Estrada. There was a strategy of Estrada of Mexico to claim a nobility. This son never exists. In fact Alonso de Estrada was son of Juan Hernández of Ciudad Real a squire and her first wife.
Spanish wiki"Aunque él mismo se jactaba de ser hijo natural de Fernando el Católico y Luisa de Estrada, según los datos recopilados en el expediente de limpieza de sangre de Jorge de Alvarado y Villafaña, su bisnieto, Alonso fue hijo de Juan Hernández Hidalgo y su primera esposa (cuyo nombre no recordaban los testigos), siendo sus abuelos paternos Diego Hernández Hidalgo (residente en Ciudad Real) y María González de Estrada. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 10:49, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Aixa and Ferdinand: Sources?
I'm trying to find sources for this union, or even the existence of Aixa, and haven't yet found anything but links back to other Wikipedia articles. The footnote here is not to a reliable source, but to someone's blog entry. Given that Boabdil's life has been highly mythologized, it wouldn't surprise me that Aixa is another legend, though not one than I can source at all. So I'm going to delete it.
Heir to Castile?
It seems to me that he was, according to primogeniture, second in line to the throne of Castile at the moment of his wife's accession (after their daughter Isabella), since Isabella had no closer eligible relatives. Is this true? Surtsicna (talk) 10:20, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
She had her niece Joanna "La Beltraneja", against whom she was at war. She was her would-be heir, according to the laws of Castile. However, I am not aware whether she had this law modified to favour Ferdinand. --Superflicka (talk) 11:42, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Sigourney Weaver played Ferdinand? I don't think so. She actually played Isabel. Ferdinand only appears for some second in the film and doesn't have any lines. I don't even think his role is relevant at all. I suggest that mention be erased. --Superflicka (talk) 11:37, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Worth mentioning that he had lice?
- Fornaciari, G; Giuffra V, Marinozzi S et al. (2009). "'Royal' pediculosis in Renaissance Italy: lice in the mummy of the King of Naples Ferdinand II of Aragon (1467-1496)". Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 104 (4): 671–672. PMID 19722098. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help); Cite uses deprecated parameter