This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
These pages have been merged, per discussion. Due to the merger, I have reassessed the article at relevant wikiprojects as C-class. WTF? (talk) 14:26, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
This is only a suggestion, I don't see it as a no-brainer. But until just now this article had far more about RAF Gravesend than its own article. I've copy and pasted the relevant sections into that article, but the fact that had happened in the first place makes me think that it would be more sensible to have one good article than two slightly out-of-sync ones. 184.108.40.206 (talk) 14:43, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Support per nom, one B class article is better than two Start class articles. It should prove possible to include the RAF history within this article. Mjroots (talk) 12:58, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Support particularly as the cut and paste between articles caused a copyright violation problem. Because the move was not properly attributed I have reverted the cut and paste move. Suggest the stub is now redirected here. MilborneOne (talk) 15:27, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Support Merge this information as RAF Gravesend. It is accepted policy that if an RAF station existed it should have its own article. If Gravesend Airport still existed and was still in operation it could also have its own article (see Enniskillen/St Angelo Airport and Carlisle Lake District Airport, but in this instance the history of the former (and extinct) municipal airport should merely form part of the history of RAF Gravesend. 21st CENTURYGREENSTUFF 11:29, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Support Merge into RAF Gravesend. Gavbadger (talk) 12:40, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.