Jump to content

Talk:Hitomi Aizawa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

With 245,000 Google hits in English and 1,320,000 for 相澤 仁美, it's hard to argue lack of notability, even though the article is kreplach and I can't readily find RS in English. There's no way an AFD would succeed, which is why I removed the N tag. THF (talk) 07:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, but WP:N requires evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Once some reference sources have been added to the article providing evidence of notability, there should be no problem in removing the notability tag. --DAJF (talk) 15:00, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That's what the {unreferenced} or {refimprove} tag is for. The notability tag is going to confuse someone into PROD'ing or AFD'ing this wastefully. I'm a deletionist, and even I recognize this would get slapped as a speedy keep unless I canvassed enough deletionists to make it a slow keep. THF (talk) 15:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Hitomi Aizawa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]