Jump to content

Talk:Human ecology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A note

[edit]

Human ecology is a problematic field to describe, since it is not one subject, but several that uses the same name. Thus, as a starter, this page should have a "ambigious word" entry, so that one can link to different meanins of the word human ecology. For instance, home economics is called Human ecology in many places in the US. The Chicago school of sociology is much different than the two journals that are includes, one belongs to anthropology, the other one is a vague mix of little of everything, but neither is based in sociology. The whole page needs major clean-up and improvement.

HE logic —Preceding unsigned comment added by HE logic (talk • contribs) 10:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the above, I would submit that the term Social_ecology overlaps with much of the concepts on this Human Ecology entry, rather than primarily the Murray_Bookchin predominated current concept. Perhaps the two pages need to be expressly linked somehow and rationalised?

121.45.233.203 (talk) 12:37, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Patrick Sunter[reply]

In response to the initial note, preliminary updates have been made to correct historical details related to the development of the term "human ecology" and connections to the discipline(s) of home economics/human ecology. Sections of the article may have a sociological slant which may require additional balancing. It is agreed that additional clean-up and improvement of the page are needed, including the "See Also" section.
Naranjaa (talk) 20:08, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More work has been done in the history section to attempt to integrate multidisciplinary historical development. It should also be noted that the history is currently North America-centric and does not fully reflect important developments in Europe. Also, in the contemporary academic/professional field "Human Ecology" as used by a number of NA universities, there are also also ties to Material Culture, etc. not yet mentioned. Agreed that an "ambiguous word" entry may be useful as suggested above.
Naranjaa (talk) 16:14, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, this article is decent. There is clear structure and balanced content, and the tone is neutral and has good sourcing. The reference section is extensive and there is lots of citation. However, the lead section is lacking and not very detailed. There is also an instance or two of value statements such as "most important". This should not be included because each article should be as unbiased as possible with no statements signaling opinion. In these aspects this article could use work, but it generally is a good source for information. LilHorton (talk) 19:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Major work needed

[edit]

I have been the primary author of ecology for some time now. The ecology article is too large and I want to reduce its size. I would like to place the section material into this article - but it will take some time to integrate it. I'm going to do a bit of work in here - with broad sweeps - please bear with me for a little while. I will do my best to save some of the material in here - but in all honesty it is just a list of stuff lacking any real integration.Thompsma (talk) 18:05, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am gradually grabbing the garbled text at the base of this article - reading the citations, fixing the text, and them migrating it to relevant sections of the article. The historical development section could probably use some sub-headings...any ideas??Thompsma (talk) 06:52, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Further Reading

[edit]

Would someone be willing to give me a hand and go through the long list of further reading at the end of this article? If the list could be reduced to include those publications that are not in the references section - this would be a great help.Thompsma (talk) 06:52, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

At suggestion

[edit]

Someone suggested on my User Talk Page that I at least glance over this Article, which I did. I don't see any striking need for further changes at the moment. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 05:26, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relation to Human Behavioral Ecology

[edit]

Might be useful to add at least a little bit in this article on the relation of Human Ecology to Human behavioral ecology. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 19:16, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Human ecology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:22, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Human ecology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:49, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Human ecology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Images and Media

[edit]

More images could be added to the article (if found and adhered to Wikipedia's copyright regulations), in order to visibly assimilate and understand the topic, such as images of the key persons, terms, and concepts.-- Lkhk32 (talk) 12:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Human_ecology&oldid=1207666491"