Jump to content

Talk:North Sea Germanic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Ingvaeonic languages)

WikiProject Scotland

[edit]

Shouldn't this be part of WikiProject Scotland, since Scots is grouped here with English (for reasons that should be obvious to any Anglophone reading the Scots Wikipedia)? --50.45.42.56 (talk) 10:05, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't notice I was logged out. The above comment was from me. --Evice (talk) 10:06, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Jutland?

[edit]

As a student of Anglo-Saxon who wonders what languages were spoken in Jutland and when, I can't help noticing that the numerous pages that refer to it all say something different and VERY VAGUE. I suppose that a dialect of Saxon reigned until maybe 900AD when early Danish took over? And what is that pink at the tip of your map, early Danish or something else (some of the putative maps of Tacitus' Germania indicate the Cimbri ended up there?!)? FangoFuficius (talk) 07:43, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

-I am also looking for more information on Danish contributions to Anglo-Frisian languages. It needs to be on this page 124.169.133.90 (talk) 14:27, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 December 2017

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:07, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Ingvaeonic languagesNorth Sea Germanic – I suggest to move the article to North Sea Germanic, as this is currently the most often used term for this dialectal grouping. This would also make it more consistent with its sister-articles Weser-Rhine Germanic and Elbe Germanic and avoid possible confusion with the Ingaevones-article.AKAKIOS (talk) 20:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support - the arguments for the move are sound. --Pfold (talk) 13:37, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - for consistency and clarity. --Bermicourt (talk) 19:31, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - per Ngram viewer. Thinker78 (talk) 06:48, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.