Talk:Jessica Seinfeld

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jessica Seinfeld article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Veganism and Vegetarianism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I’m not sure why several anonymous IPs keep reverting improvements to this article and making it look like a blog rant. Pontification (i.e., “Jessica should have known better”) is NOT appropriate on Wikipedia. Stick with facts and quotes from legitimate sources. Also, balance is required. Jessica has denied knowledge of Lapine’s work and therefore a statement to that effect is appropriate - stop deleting it. Also, please learn to format section headings correctly. And stop using the word “plagiarism.” Plagiarism is when an author lifts entire passages from another’s work and uses it in her own work, without attribution. Seinfeld is not accused of this – her cookbook is merely very similar to Lapine’s, and she never claimed that she invented the concept of hiding vegetables in children’s food. Therefore, at worse, this is a case of copyright infringement. Even then, recipes are rarely protected by copyright, so there’s really no legal case here. And finally, please get your facts and dates straight, and stop deleting my corrections. CagedRage 18:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There has been plenty of defense for Jessica Seinfled. But the article reads like an attack on her. This should be remedied and I've notified the BLP noticeboard. --Horoball 20:59, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Case settled?

There is currently a footnote saying the case was settled out of court on July 29, 2008 for an undisclosed sum, and that there is a gag order forbidding disclosure of how much the settlement is. However, the link given as reference is broken, and I was unable to find any other reference on the web. Could it really be that NO ONE wrote about the settlement in their blogs, when so much was said earlier about the lawsuit? Ratfox (talk) 04:19, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion is that CagedRage has not sufficiently studied the case, and, as a result, this Wikipedia entry is misinformed and misleading. Why isn't there a link to the "smoking gun" website that has a pdf file of the original lawsuit filing? That filing makes explicitly clear that Lapine is not claiming that the idea of pureeing food is hers. On the contrary, and much more specifically, Lapine outlines in page after page the incredible number of instances that prove that Jessica Seinfeld has taken nearly verbatim passages from the book and presented them as her own. In a majority of the cases, it is clear that Seinfeld has simply changed one or two words, but has largely plagiarized Lapine's book. The misuse of Lapine's book goes well beyond "fair use" legislation. The evidence is clear and unmistakeable. In any case, CagedRage and others may not agree with this analysis, but at the *very* least they should be upfront and honest enough to include a link to the original complaint so that readers can make up their own minds.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0107083seinfeld1.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.249.178.55 (talk) 04:35, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the Smoking Gun link should be referred to in the article. Specifically, because it demonstrates the absurdity of the lawsuit. I just read through its 19 pages, which even include lengthy transcripts from Seinfeld appearing on Letterman. (Note to self: if you sue Jerry Seinfeld, don't act surprised that he has a bully pulpit to make fun of you. Comedians benefit amply from the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.) The little content in this document with any substance is a list of identical vegetables secretly put into snacks, e.g., spinach put into brownies. Both books use the same vegetables for a number of snacks. That's it. There is nothing else there. The case was thrown out of court for good reason. What else is there to say? (Nothing. That question was rhetorical.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.92.237.244 (talk) 16:48, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pure Advertisement

This reads like pure advertising for Jessica Seinfeld's businesses. And it's funny how someone keeps making changes so that everything sounds positive towards Jerry and Jessica. This is supposed to be a factual account of the woman and not only does it sound like an "about" page for her Baby Buggy venture, but it's being manipulated by her or people who work for her because Jerry and Jessica have screwed over quite a few people, husbands, Realtors, authors and that's going to have to go in this article if she's going to have an article on Wiki. How sad are these people that they must be seen in a good light even if it means lying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.12.229.117 (talk) 20:50, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jessica Seinfeld. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110711145452/http://www.harpercollinscatalogs.com/harper/516_1679_313835333431.htm to http://www.harpercollinscatalogs.com/harper/516_1679_313835333431.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:07, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Name change

From the opening sentence "Jessica Seinfeld (born Nina Danielle Sklar", why is there no discussion of when/why she changed her name from Nina to Jessica? Surely, being a public personality, some interviewer/reporter has asked this question before? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.210.115.106 (talk) 04:50, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Came here to ask the same! 98.144.130.222 (talk) 20:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To add to article

Basic information to add to this article: information about Jessica Seinfeld's family background and ethnic heritage. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 02:48, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stance on Israel

how is this blurb -

“At UCLA, counter-protesters funded by Charity for Israel turned violent, attacking the pro-Palestinian protesters' camp and shooting fireworks into the encampment.”

- relevant to Jessica Seinfeld’s biography? The article earlier noted how she donated money to Charity For Israel. Okay, that’s a fact about her. This subsequent blurb about what Charity For Israel is alleged to have subsequently done since does not seem to have anything to do with her . To my understanding ,this is a news item that can be discussed on a news page or another area regarding that organization. As it relates to her, was she in some way involved in these alleged activity, made a statement on it or otherwise involved? RelevanceCounsel (talk) 16:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, I am not seeing any evidence in the linked sources that identifies this charity as backing counterprotests. 96.235.17.133 (talk) 18:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]