Jump to content

Talk:John Broadhurst

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Title

[edit]

I defer to those who know these matters better than I do, and I see from the history that this has been a point perhaps of contention, but surely he does not retain the title of Bishop now that he is a Catholic layman, unless it is Church of England protocol to do so, which presumably he would not appreciate? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 15:58, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unless some reliable and verifiable source is provided to the contrary the assumption ought to be that once received into the Roman Catholic Church they cannot in any meaningful or formal sense still be considered as Church of England bishops or entitled to retain any clerical styles. This ought to be "bleeding obvious" but strange things are always possible with the church. Anglicanus (talk) 16:32, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thanks.--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 19:19, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Style section

[edit]

is it encyclopaedic to have a section listing this history of how he has been addresses. Seems odd to me. -- Beardo (talk) 21:17, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Such sections are not uncommon in Wikipedia biographical articles about clergy and nobility. But I personally think that they are not appropriate. Noel S McFerran (talk) 23:00, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mrs Burnham

[edit]

The article states that Andrew Burnham's wife was received into the RC church. I believe this is not true, since she has been an adherent of the Jewish faith, and has not to my knowledge been baptised a Christian. 82.36.88.233 (talk) 17:51, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are correct. Thanks for correcting this. Anglicanus (talk) 12:42, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Broadhurst. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Broadhurst. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]