Talk:Kaizen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

kaizen is not Chinese word.[edit]

kaizen is not Chinese language.60.33.32.158 (talk) 13:41, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

What this name kaizen actually means exccept "changing good". because when i heard this name i feel something . and i change my actual from it . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.64.160.167 (talk) 09:32, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Ya its japanese

Biplow Kumar (talk) 10:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Kaizen does not mean "continual improvement"[edit]

I am Japanese. Kaizen does not mean "continual improvement", only "improvement". It comprises of the kanji for "modify" and "good", literally translating to "make better". 240F:74:ABE:1:B0ED:A213:4150:BD61 (talk) 18:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Agreed however this is extrapolated in the definition of the term to include the ongoing progress of Kaizen – Craig Davison (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kaizen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

how many approaches?[edit]

The last sentence of the lead paragraph of § Overview is

Two kaizen approaches have been distinguished.

Really? I count five: Point, System, Line, Plane, and Cube.

--Thnidu (talk) 20:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

text is inconsistent[edit]

§ Point says

In some cases, it is also possible that the positive effects of point kaizen in one area can reduce or eliminate benefits of point Kaizen in some other area. An example of Point kaizen could be a shop inspection by a supervisor and he finds broken materials or other small issues, and then asks the owner of the shop to perform a quick Kaizen (5S) to rectify those issues.

I fail to see how any of this would "reduce or eliminate benefits of point Kaizen in some other area".

--Thnidu (talk) 20:34, 30 March 2020 (UTC)