Talk:Kim Richards
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A note about sources
[edit]At the moment, all facts in this article are sourced to (though not necessarily drawn from) the subject's entry at imdb.com. Rather than footnote each sentence, one note has been inserted at the end of each paragraph. As the article expands, please try to adjust the references as appropriate. Thanks and happy editing! Butseriouslyfolks 07:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
You forgot to mention she was on James at 16 in 1978
I just watched "Race to Witch Mountain" and Kim Richards' character is credited as "Tina" not Tia, as it is in the first Witch Mountain saga. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.149.220.108 (talk) 22:20, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Tia was corrected to Tina =
Done. Eruditess (talk) 17:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- Tia was corrected to Tina =
Passive voice parody
[edit]A recent Language Log post by Geoffrey K. Pullum analyzes a spoof rewriting of this article by Matt Cherett on Buzzfeed.
Keahapana (talk) 04:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Heading Picture
[edit]Can someone give Kim a heading picture? I don't know how to & think it should be an up-to-date one. Maybe something like: 1
or 2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.200.222.160 (talk) 16:50, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Recent picture
[edit]Can someone please add a recent picture?Zigzig20s (talk) 21:54, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Agree . Eruditess (talk) 20:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Zigzig20s and Eruditess: Does anyone have one ? - FlightTime (open channel) 22:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- @FlightTime, I don't think it's just as plain and simple as having one. Wikipedia has certain rules for posting pictures of people. Mainly due to copyright. So if we can find a recent photo of kim that is fair/free use or no copyright, then we can use it. Or I think if we get permission from somebody who owns the copyright. Might be worth looking into Wiki-photo policy. I am just going off what I remember from the top of my head. Eruditess (talk) 23:08, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Eruditess: I'm a file move and ex-OTRS agent, I know the guidelines, I was just asking a question, in a simple maner. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 23:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- @FlightTime, I don't think it's just as plain and simple as having one. Wikipedia has certain rules for posting pictures of people. Mainly due to copyright. So if we can find a recent photo of kim that is fair/free use or no copyright, then we can use it. Or I think if we get permission from somebody who owns the copyright. Might be worth looking into Wiki-photo policy. I am just going off what I remember from the top of my head. Eruditess (talk) 23:08, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Zigzig20s and Eruditess: Does anyone have one ? - FlightTime (open channel) 22:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Appearance on Dr. Phil
[edit]Her appearing on Dr. Phil is not notable — it is simply someone on a current TV show doing a confessional promotional appearance. If she said anything noteworthy in that appearance, then we add that and simply cite that it came from an episode of Dr. Phil. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:42, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- And incidentally, Dr. Phil is not "a major network show." It's just a syndicated program. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:46, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- I have blocked an anonymous editor for edit warring, but for the record, I would myself consider People to be a reliable source. Whether or not the content is appropriate for the article is clearly up for debate, however. — MusikAnimal talk 21:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- I agree that the Time Inc. publication People is a reliable source. I did not contest the reasoning of the editor who removed the content since we at least both agreed that the content was simply a standard, non-notable talk-show appearance. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:48, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class New York (state) articles
- Low-importance New York (state) articles
- Start-Class California articles
- Unknown-importance California articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Start-Class television articles
- Unknown-importance television articles
- Start-Class Reality television articles
- Unknown-importance Reality television articles
- Reality television task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- Start-Class WikiProject Women articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women articles