Talk:LJ Ross

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 3 February 2016 by reviewer Onel5969 (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Literature

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 08 February 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No move. Cúchullain ^t/c 18:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Louise Ross → LJ Ross – Conventional to use an author's public pen name rather than personal name as page name. – JR3592 (talk) 21:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). EdJohnston (talk) 03:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose - Per WP:COMMONNAME. 350 hits vs. 103. Is there a policy supporting use of an author's pen name instead of personal name as a page name? Meatsgains (talk) 04:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Per WP:COMMONNAME. I don't like the google hits method (although it does count for something). For me, the key is how do the sources refer to her. Aside from those which are directly about her book, which of course use her pen name, those from independent reliable sources, use Louise, for the most part. Even in articles like that from the hexham-courant and Express North, they use both names, but clearly are talking about Louise, who writes under LJ. The article does need an edit to be consistent. However, I think that consistency will be achieved if it is simply edited for MOS standards, and only the last name is used throughout. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose if anything it would be L. J. Ross, www.ljrossauthor.com/ "L.J. Ross is the bestselling author of the DCI Ryan series of romantic suspense novels.." but it seems that Louise Ross is http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/ponteland-lawyer-turned-author-swapping-10263722 attested and therefore we would use that name. Leone Ross also writes as L. J. Ross, and there's a third L J Ross in the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator article. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Self Published[edit]

The page at the moment doesn't mention that Ross has had all this success without a traditional publisher. As far as I can make out, her books are just self published and the physical paper copies are printed by Amazon. That seems extraordinary and worth talking about, if anyone knows the details. Cardinal Wurzel (talk) 18:58, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

LJ Ross.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:07, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudonym?[edit]

Is LJ Ross really a pseudonym for Louise Ross? Rosiestep thinks so; I am less sure. If Louise Ross were writing as Q Z Chaupington I could see it but LJ Ross seems a bit close to home. Best to all, DBaK (talk) 19:16, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered, that's a good question. Much of my Wikipedia work in the last few years has focused on pre-20th-century women writers, and many of them disguised their identities in general, and gender in particular, by using initials instead of their given+middle names, or by totally changing their names, or not including a name at all. In this case -the biography of a modern-day woman writer- we don't know if the author's middle name start with a "J" (I checked the author's website and it's not addressed.). We can't assume that "J" is the first letter of the author's middle name -- it is possible that her middle name might start with another letter or maybe she doesn't have one. Ergo, I didn't feel it appropriate to assume that "LJ Ross" is a condensed version of her real name. This was my thought process before I added the two "pseudonym" categories. Rosiestep (talk) 21:03, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rosiestep, thanks and fair enough. I still don't think it is the most convincing bit of pseudonymery ever, compared to if she'd called herself say Baluji Shrivastav, but I do take your point, and I bow to your greatly superior experience in looking at and thinking about these matters, which I just do not have. So, having done my token bit of muttering and tyre-kicking, I think I will happily leave it alone now. Thank you very much for the civilized discussion. Cheers DBaK (talk) 11:29, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The "J" is for James, her husband; she has it because of his help. Claidheamhmor (talk) 06:41, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops – unagreed move[edit]

I see that some time ago some swine moved this from Louise Ross to LJ Ross, without discussion, presumably (flaky memory here) because they had not seen the 2016 discussion above. Oops and sorry. Please feel free to reopen this – obviously I would not have just sailed on and done it irregardless [sic] if I had seen the 2016 one first. Gah! Apologies and best to all DBaK (talk) 19:23, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging previous discussionists in an attempt to be fair: Cuchullain, JR3592, Meatsgains, onel5969, In ictu oculi, sorry, whoops etc DBaK (talk) 19:28, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]