Talk:Laura Amy Schlitz

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Children's literature High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources

1. Library of Congress Catalog Records for all six books (2006 to 2012). I used these records as sources today but provided a formal reference only for one of them.

2. Catalog records for A Gypsy at Almack's (1993) by Chloe Cheshire

LCCat[1]
WorldCat[2]

To identify Chloe Cheshire as Schlitz we need a reference. I think we should have that simply to mention the 1993 book in this article.

3. Information about A Clamor of Children (2005), evidently a version of Good Masters!. (Note also that LCCat notes "original title" Villeins and Vermin, Simpleton and Saints for Good Masters![3].)

WorldCat[4]
Google books[5]
Horn Book Laura Amy Schlitz The Successful Writer by Mary Lee Donovan The Middle-Aged Children’s Book Editor
Answers according to "Collecting Children's Books"[6]

4. 2008 Newbery Medal acceptance speech (p148ff excluding p151)

--P64 (talk) 04:11, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:BOLD

Re: this change of mine, boldface in the infobox's awards section is unnecessary and contravenes MOS:BOLD as it tends to emphasize and draw undue attention to the awards and away from the other content in the box. Template:Infobox writer doesn't instruct the use of boldface when using {{awd}} templates. Either get consensus at the template to change the instructions, or a local consensus should be achieved here, with some argument other than "I like it better". Myriad Pro has argued that boldface makes it easier to understand, but we're talking about two lines of data for each award. And the "Notable awards" section is bolded. Also, the |pseudonym= parameter, per template instructions is to be propagated with a name, not with titles associated with those names. Note Stephen King. The specifics should be detailed in the article prose, not in the infobox. Infoboxes are too commonly misused as repositories for excessive data. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that "Infoboxes are too commonly misused as repositories for excessive data." So why is a pen name that she used once in a book written in the '90s that can be bought for 1 cent on Amazon needed in the infobox? I think just having it in the body is fine.

Do you think we can compromise on the bold issue by using bullet points instead?

Myriad Pro (talk) 21:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to remove the pen name from the infobox, I won't object. As for the bullets, I still don't think they're needed. When we list actors in television infoboxes, we don't use bullets, we just list the names. The awards are listed in a bolded section and I don't see that it's difficult to comprehend that there are three awards listed. If the template instructions called for either bolding or bullets, you might have a point. If we add wikilinks to the awards, that might help while keeping us in conformity with the template instructions. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:58, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of what I just did, no bullets, no bold, just a tiny space in between each award, and putting the year on the same line as the award. I believe it still complies with template instructions. Myriad Pro (talk) 14:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If we're going to use a template, we should use it properly, as properly formatted data in these templates are often parsed by other mechanical means. For instance, when you search Google for "When was Tom Cruise born" or "How old is Tom Cruise?" Google might parse the data from the {{Birth date and age}} template at his Wikipedia article. Monkeying with template formatting just to make it more subjectively attractive, doesn't make much sense to me. I'd rather yield on the bullets and call it a day. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:40, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think inserting a blank line in between the templates will mess up Google or anything.... Myriad Pro (talk) 11:27, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't talking about a blank line between templates I was talking about this edit where you moved the date out of the date parameter and into the title parameter. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:46, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so can we agree it's good now? Myriad Pro (talk) 01:03, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's tolerable. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:06, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]