This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk page
I have improved article with content and references. It would be nice if the proposed user specifies the article needs to be kept. Pust aware2 (talk) 13:46, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
I'm still not convinced it should be an independent article, but you've done a good job of showing relevance and notability. I'll honour the request to remove the prod tag. 184.108.40.206 (talk) 05:27, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for removal, I have yet to expand misuse section. It is indeed notable, it is opposed because extra loud noise is imposition of fundamentalists on their own moderate community. Pust aware2 (talk) 05:38, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
"In an era when church bells are silenced on Sundays because of complaints, why the special exemptions for Muslims?"
That is, restrictions on religious utterances have been imposed before on religious institutions. I don't know enough of how things have worked out in different places. I 'think' one place judged whether the sounds were a public service. That is, if the church/mosque rang the hours, and also rang for a couple special circumstances, keeping the hours was public service. In that way, a muted call five times a day might be okay, but anything lengthy or "too loud" would serve only a limited group, not the community? Haranguing the community is harassing the community? Anyway, you might have to relate this instance of community vs. religious institution to the broader area of religious freedom vs. community responsibility? Shenme (talk) 11:30, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
I think it is not appropriate to discuss the topic here, instead this place is to discuss about the article. Pust aware2 (talk) 05:41, 27 September 2009 (UTC)