Jump to content

Talk:Marjorie Tuite

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability

[edit]

Subject doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO criteria. Looks like a classic case of WP:1E. I propose a redirect to A Catholic Statement on Pluralism and Abortion. Cloonmore (talk) 23:47, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article can easily be expanded rather than redirected. Tuite is quite notable as the founder of the National Assembly of Religious Women (NARW). She was the Director of Ecumenical Action for Church Women United (CWU). For NARW and CWU, she created a feminist political skills leadership training kit that was influential. She co-founded NETWORK, a national Catholic justice group stressing social change through legislation. In 1982, she founded the Women's Coalition to Stop Intervention in Central America. She was a delegate to the First Congress on Human Rights in El Salvador. She was a prominent activist for the Sandinistas. Binksternet (talk) 00:15, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Quite notable," eh? Got any sources? (i.e., not OR for a change, Binks). Cloonmore (talk) 02:09, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I prefer to compose or improve articles that I select rather than ones other people select. My comment above was written with reliable sources open in several windows, and if you wished, you could find them. Binksternet (talk) 04:32, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's strange. After a few mins searching on Google, I wasn't able to find any of your supposed RS, other than a couple of obits that emphasize her participation in the 1984 YT ad. I do see that some the info you mention is here, but those are personal papers donated to a university, not an RS. Looks like an AfD. Cloonmore (talk) 15:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rather than making work for others with an AfD, taking time away from their chosen pursuits, you could expand this article with sources, describing Tuite's advocacy for women's rights in the Church and for human rights in El Salvador.
As auxiliary articles, you could write National Assembly of Religious Women (redirect National Assembly of Women Religious), and you could write NETWORK (Catholic group). Binksternet (talk) 17:10, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good effort, but you're scraping the barrel. Much of that would fail the RS test. Many are self-published by Loyola U., WOC, the Lorettos, or regurgitated Wikipedia materials. There are a few passing references to her in texts, and a couple articles about her visiting Central America with other nuns. One appearance on Donahue falls far from establishing notability. And there is a full paragraph containing Sr. Camille D'Arienzo's personal reminiscences in a 2002 column in the Nat Cath Rep. I don't see the case for notability. There is a paucity of secondary sources about her and supporting her notability, as opposed to the groups or events that she participated in. Cloonmore (talk) 19:18, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Would an obituary from the New York Times help? Because they printed one ([2]), describing her as a notable "advocate for women's rights", and noting that her advocacy in that capacity (and her opposition to U.S. policy in Central America) rubbed the Church hierarchy the wrong way. MastCell Talk 05:53, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Marjorie Tuite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:51, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]