Jump to content

Talk:Namma Metro

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Namma Metro?

[edit]

From the photo, is that the official name for the Metro? Grusl 09:54, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes , it s the official name.

The Bangalore Metro should be the main page

[edit]

Namma Metro is a colloquial term and a brand name. But it is not a common name by which the Metro is referred to. To an outsider it will be confusing to list Bangalore Metro as "Namma Metro" in Wikipedia. I understand the Parochial and chauvinistic concerns, but it is better to categorize this as "Bangalore Metro" Xwas (talk) 07:11, 18 June 2010 (UTC)xwas[reply]

Namma Metro is a registered legal name. No parochial or chavuinism here.. It is as parochial as calling Deutsche Bahn as "German Train." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.113.47.66 (talk) 05:09, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect URL for Operator's Name

[edit]

In the side box, summarising this page, the link for BMRC points to Bangladesh Medical Research Council. Either this link should be removed or pointed to http://www.bmrc.co.in/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.248.161.91 (talk)


Open when ready not when VVIP ready

[edit]

They want to open the Bangalore metro only when the PM is available ? till then the millions Rs spent on building it lies unused. that is a mad waste. open the metro and have your ceremony anytime - you will get your pic in the paper anyway and we will get to use something built with our money for us.

Also expenses like the mock metro are better not spent. with that Rs 4,00,000 we could have helped poor farmers, given loans. who needs to see how to board a train? show a video on tv ... if we can get on a mall elevator we can figure out a train with automatic doors! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tgkprog (talk • contribs) 01:33, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NEWS - train derails during trials

[edit]

No one hurt but Friday 7th Oct 2011, one of the trains derailed. Apparently due to over speeding in a section where the curve of the track is not optimal but could not be helped due to Industry proximity in the Bypanhalli area — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.93.144.182 (talk) 22:28, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Name

[edit]

Whoa! The naming conventions here are just a mess. Is it "Namma Metro" or "Bangalore Metro"? To my understanding it is Namma Metro operated by the Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited (BMRCL). This is not an unusual situation, as all over the world there are branded public transportation systems which have an overseeing commission or government agency with a different name to differentiate their function. The problem here in Wikipedia is that lines are suffixed Namma and stations are suffixed Bangalore and there are duplicate categories for the two different names covering the same articles. There is no article called "Bangalore Metro" and it makes no sense to have categories or other articles related to something that does not exist here. Lets get this straightened out now! Sw2nd (talk) 17:22, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh, it is a mess, I agree. The problem is that the papers themselves are unclear; sometimes they call it Bangalore Metro, sometimes they call it Namma Metro. We need to have a good discussion here to resolve the matter. Lynch7 17:26, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited in an agreement with a private contractor states:

BMRCL has been established with the pricipal object of planning, designing, developing, constructing, maintaining, operating and financing mass transit and other urban transport and people mover systems of all types and descriptions in Bangalore, and in pursuance thereto, BMRCL is in the process of construction of a Metro Rail System called "Namma Metro" for the City of Bangalore.

This clearly means that Namma Metro is only one of many projects by BMRCL. I therefore propose to change or move everything to read Namma where it relates to the Metro rail system. I will also create a series of succession templates that will allow for navigation between stations. Sw2nd (talk) 23:24, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes Namma Metro is the name of the intra-city mass rapid transport system project undertaken by BMRCL. The current name is correct although people often call it Bangalore metro. The proposed high speed rail link to the airport will also be undertaken by BMRCL. — Abhishek  Talk 12:48, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think it will all be called Namma Metro in the end as the 'high' speed link will be seen by people as another stretch with fewer stations. There was an article in the papers about the stretch being part of the metro, though with separate check in counters as an option in some stations.
During construction they might call it by different names for administrative ; raising finances and audit purposes. Tgkprog (talk) 23:26, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong claim?

[edit]

It is mentioned "Each corridor consists of two tunnels which are the first underground tunnels built for trains in South India". Wrong. The tunnels for Konkan railway predates these by more than a decade. Incidentally the length of its tunnels is more than that of any of the metros including Kolkata metro which was mostly underground in its first phase. There are older tunnels in Indian Railways too, eg. Mangalore Hassan, Nilgiri mountain railway, etc..

The right claim would be that these are the first tunnels for a suburban railway in South India

--K N Unni (talk) 06:35, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/bangalore_metro/
    Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 22:52, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 16:19, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Namma Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:44, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Namma Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Namma Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:54, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong claim on daily ridership

[edit]

The claim that average daily ridership is 175000 seems to be wrong. The reference cited for average daily ridership gives 110,000 for the purple line. Editing the claim. If there is an updated reference with an updated number, please feel free to change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.99.187.221 (talk) 14:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Namma Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of the name "Namma"?

[edit]

The article doesn't explain why the system is called "Namma" as opposed to "Bangalore Metro". best, Sunil060902 (talk) 22:51, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sunil060902: I don't think the origin is of importance as there is any significant reason out there. But there is a source right at the first line which proves that this system is called Namma Metro. — LeoFrank  Talk 17:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Parking not shown at Trinity station

[edit]

As per the namma metro official site, there is parking facility available at Trinity station on Green line. It looks the map is old. Hemadri Ramaraju (talk) 02:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Namma Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:50, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Construction completed

[edit]

Under 1.1.1 - Underground construction "The UG2 (north to south corridor), from Majestic to K.R Market is expected to finish the entire tunnelling works by August 2016, after which the Green Line would be opened for service, towards the end of the year."

Construction has been completed , so should change but I don't more information on it Reo (talk) 07:05, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Rejenish: Please go ahead and boldly make the change. — LeoFrank  Talk 09:49, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:38, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can we modify & update?

[edit]

1) The description at the beginning needs a few changes - no history section.

2) A lot of background information contains details that are jumbled - this can be streamlined.

Can we modify the contents, so information is presented better? Cpt Naveen (talk) 13:57, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding "Network Map" section

[edit]

The network map section shows no map of the metro lines, but just a Bangalore map. Can we remove this? --ShellPandey (talk) 09:36, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you click on the map, it expands to show the network lines.
What would be best in my opinion would be to reduce the map to a "thumb" in size and have it on the side or in the infobox. It is not useful to have section for a map, that only shows something useful if you click on the map. If the map were thumb-size it would be obvious that you need to click on it.-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:00, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Map


@Toddy1: Clicking on the above map didn't show the metro lines for me. I am not sure if I am doing something wrong or not. --ShellPandey (talk) 13:35, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Do you use a computer or an iPhone? I use a computer with a big screen. On my one, it shows a purple line and a green line that I think are meant to represent the train lines in question. If it does not work on your device, try zooming in on the city centre.-- Toddy1 (talk) 14:25, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Computer. it started showing, but i could swear it wasn't there a few hours ago lmao. --ShellPandey (talk) 20:59, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:24, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An image is wrongfully marked as Baiyappanahalli Station

[edit]

This Image, which seems to be from one of the Underground stations, is wrongfully labelled as Baiyapannahalli Station. While I am not sure as to which one it is (Vidhana Soudha Station, I guess), its definitely not Baiyappanahalli, which is at ground level SunnyandBunny 21 (talk) 17:56, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal for Bengaluru Monorail

[edit]

The Bengaluru Monorail page seems like it should be merged with this page, unless I'm mistaken. It seems like the Monorail was just a proposed project that never came to fruition, so it could potentially just be a note on this page rather than its own separate article.

LiterallyDavidBowie (talk) 02:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Namma_Metro&oldid=1223846799"