Jump to content

Talk:Not Strong Enough

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Dylan620 (talk · contribs) 01:48, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: The Blue Rider (talk · contribs) 13:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]
  • Some tone related suggestions since there are no sources backing up such phrasing:
  • major success → success
  • enjoyed widespread acclaim → enjoyed critical acclaim

Background

[edit]

Writing and composition

[edit]

Response

[edit]

Commercial performance

[edit]
  • Is Billboard's charts the only commercial performance that can be said about the song?
    • Aside from the United States, it only charted in Ireland and on the Japan Hot Overseas chart. There isn't a direct link for each artist's performance on the JHO chart, so the only sources for that chart are the archives of each week's listing. I did find that the song spent nine non-consecutive weeks on that chart spread out over the course of nearly a year, plus it spent two non-consecutive weeks on the Ireland singles chart. I'm off to bed shortly, but I should be able to add more information tomorrow. Dylan620 (he/him • talkedits) 00:17, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception

[edit]
  • Who is writing for Consequence?
  • I have difficulties seeing this as encyclopedical: "In July 2023, Barack Obama included "Not Strong Enough" on his annual Summer Playlist, to which Dacus tweeted, "war criminal :("."
    • I've removed this for now, although I should note that entering "barack obama summer playlist" into Wikipedia's search engine turned up multiple results for other songs'/artists' inclusions. The way this tidbit had been present in the article was a bit jarring, though, looking at it again. Dylan620 (he/him • talkedits) 00:17, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Music video

[edit]

Live performances

[edit]

Accolades

[edit]
  • Everything seems good.

Stability

[edit]

Images

[edit]
  • Three images: two of them with the correct copyright status and suitable captions, but I am not sure about fair rationale's of the music video screenshot, we already have other pictures that identify the articles' subject.
    • Hmmmm. We do have other pictures to identify the band, but as the music video is about the band having fun together, I wanted to use a screencap of them engaging in one of the activities chronicled in the video. Do you have any suggestions? Dylan620 (he/him • talkedits) 00:17, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]
  • The numbers of the sources are from this revision. Checked source 2, 5, 8, 14, 47, 50, 61, 62 and 70.
  • Source 61 nor 62 doesn't say anything about a Santa Monica Pier.
  • @The Blue Rider: Source 62 does mention the Santa Monica Pier, though :/ "Phoebe wanted the monster trucks bad," Lucy recalled. "I wanted to go to the Santa Monica Pier pretty bad because I just had never been." I will concede that source 61 doesn't mention the SMP by name, but it does mention "hit[ting] up amusement parks", which implicitly refers to the SMP. Dylan620 (he/him • talkedits) 16:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 01:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boygenius performing live in 2023
Boygenius performing live in 2023
Improved to Good Article status by Dylan620 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Dylan620 (he/him • talkedits) 22:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC). Interesting song GA on many and substantial sources, no copyvio obvious. I wonder if "expresses" would be a better word than "describes". The licensed image is beautiful when large, but not captivating in stamp size. In case it is not taken, I believe that the word "song" should be added to the hook for clarity that it has to do with music. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 19 July 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


– The pageviews show that the Boygenius song has not been exceeded in views by the Apocalyptica song. Additionally, the Apocalyptica song is of unclear notability, as shown on its page, whereas the Boygenius song seems to be more notable. Seeing as there are only two topics, a disambiguation page might not even be needed, a hatnote could suffice. As a fan of the Boygenius song, I might be biased, but I still believe it is the primary topic. Courtesy pings to @Ss112, Dylan620, Johnny421, and HMDude3: as involved/top editors in these articles. – The Sharpest Lives (💬✏️ℹ️) (ping me!) 15:40, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.