This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2022. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
A fact from Olena Stepaniv appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 April 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that postcards were made of Olena Stepaniv(pictured) during the First World War, and in 1991 Lviv named a street after her?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 05:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Its a work in progress (since 3/3/22) - she seems to have been the first woman to be a Ukrainian Officer and 1 of three said to be the first women to serve with equality in a 20th century army
Created by Victuallers (talk). Self-nominated at 15:00, 5 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]
Overall: Sufficiently long, sourced, and neutral article. No copyvios detected. Interesting hook with reliable sources. However, I suggest specifying who is the "they" in the second part. TeenAngels1234 (talk) 20:50, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@TeenAngels1234: Can you look again? I see you state NA for picfree when there is an image and AGF for the sourcing when you have noted the "reliable sources". If you are happy then you need to add ((subst:DYKtick)) to say you are but replacing my normal brackets with curly brackets. Victuallers (talk) 10:06, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Victuallers and TeenAngels1234: looks like has this article gone some heavy editing since this nomination was finalized; I see a large, unsourced paragraph and a lot of added language I'm not quite comfortable with. Can this be hammered out and re-ticked? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 03:29, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It has been updated, and it looks fine to me now.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 14:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Another Poor Quality Article Hits the Front Page[edit]
This article is full of strange wording and POV. She was sent to a labor camp simply for being patriotic and not for among other things organizing an anti-Bolshevik revolt?
"She was remarkable, but she was not the first woman to fight as Olena noted that she held Polish women soldiers as role models. It is possible to buy fictionalized versions of her life" - What is that supposed to even mean?
Not to mention various unreferenced sections, citations leading to blogs, WWI era newspapers and other sources of questionable validity.--Catlemur (talk) 20:36, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree some of the wording is very strange. I've hacked some of the worst material out but further editing is needed by someone who can read the sources. Espresso Addict (talk) 21:15, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sufficiently long, sourced, and neutral article. No copyvios detected. Interesting hook with reliable sources. However, I suggest specifying who is the "they" in the second part. TeenAngels1234 (talk) 20:50, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
looks like has this article gone some heavy editing since this nomination was finalized; I see a large, unsourced paragraph and a lot of added language I'm not quite comfortable with. Can this be hammered out and re-ticked? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 03:29, 20 March 2022 (UTC)