Talk:Ouzo effect

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Ouzo effect does not demonstrate microemulsion formation.[edit]

It is simply incorrect to cite the Ouzo effect as a demonstration of microemulsion formation. The cited effect contradicts the definition of a microemulsion as a single-phase transparent mixture. The Ouzo effect demonstrates emulsion formation. There may be microemulsion present, but the high turbidity from droplet light scattering proves the composition is an emulsion, not a microemulsion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtexter (talkcontribs) 15:22, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why does "louche" redirect here?[edit]

Louche redirects here. A Google turns up no reason for this: why is it? 86.132.136.235 (talk) 18:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When absinthe (or ouzo for that matter) turns cloudy upon mixing with water, the absinthe is called to "louche". JocK (talk) 03:31, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Right, but shouldn't 'ouzo effect' redirect to louche, since louche is a verb representing the general process of solids coming out of alcoholic suspension; rather, why don't we call it the 'absinthe effect'? I just understand adopting another term for an effect that already has a word for it in existence (i.e. louche). Apothecia (talk) 04:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To become louche is to become cloudy; the ouzo effect is one specific way this happens. --Una Smith (talk) 15:52, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't really answer Apothecia's question. Why isn't this called the Arak effect? --Wild rabbit (talk) 23:30, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

when does this kick in?[edit]

Read this right after reading the ouzo article which explains that it's produced by taking 96% abv pure ehtanol with a very small bit of flavouring added, then watering it down to the required abv of at least 37.5%. Ouzo sold in commercial strengths of already 60-odd percent water doesn't come cloudy, yet adding a little water does suddenly cause it to become cloudy. What gives? The article doesn't say. 88.159.222.74 (talk) 00:18, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I left a glass of ouzo + water (cloudy) for 24hrs. When i got home it was perfectly clear again, even after agitating the mix and adding further water. What causes it to revert? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.201.82.59 (talk) 21:07, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pine-Sol[edit]

Is the milkiness when Pine-Sol is poured into a bucket of water caused by the same effect? Cactus Wren (talk) 10:27, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ouzo effect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

recommend a move[edit]

Prior work, Talk:Ouzo effect#Why does "louche" redirect here?. While the specifics of the prior discussion have changed. I think this article should be Louche effect and that other ways of description, like Ouzo effect, would then redirect here. The specific should point to the general. I am observing move proposals to understand the process or I’d begin it here. —¿philoserf? (talk) 12:46, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]