Talk:Paul Riley (actor)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Sourceless information

I removed a paragraph of information from this article earlier today that details Riley's life. Although it helps to expand article, the information, in my opinion, was potentially harmful and should be removed until sources are provided. -- Britishagent 12:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Riley has went on to star in Dear Green Place

You've got to love that Scottish grammar! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 134.36.100.168 (talk) 09:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC).[reply]

*cough* Yes, sorry about that. -- Britishagent 15:22, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Stillgamehogmanayspecial.jpg

The image Image:Stillgamehogmanayspecial.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Pages moved. Unanimous agreement amongst the respondents that there is no primary topic. (non-admin closure) — Amakuru (talk) 10:27, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Riley → Paul Riley (actor)
Paul Riley (disambiguation) → Paul Riley

– No WP:PRIMARYTOPIC exists, so the WP:DABPAGE should be the primary topic. The actor page (aided at least in part because it is the primary landing page) does get slightly more visits than the others on average, though Paul Riley (English footballer) has more traffic lately; in any case there is no clear "main" article. Esprqii (talk) 01:34, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support - FWIW the primary in Google Books is Sarah Palin's pastor who has no article. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:55, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support, clear absence of a primary target. bd2412 T 03:22, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. No primary topic. Dicklyon (talk) 08:41, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Odd statement

The article states 'The Evening Times revealed that it was most likely that Dear Green Place would be turned into a full series for the BBC, although this has never happened' - but Dear Green Place was made into a television series - so what is this referring to? Dunarc (talk) 13:36, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Riley photo.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:53, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]