Talk:Penny Jamieson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Dr. Jamieson PhD"?[edit]

That's how she's described in the first sentence, but I suspect that we should use one term for the honour or the other, not both. Anyone know for sure? Grutness...wha? 08:00, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. Having both is redundant. Fishhead64 15:46, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have added a little more biographical information, most of it from the article linked.

Being a member of a parish in Auckland, and active in the wider church, I don't think it is at all accurate to describe the church as a "predominantly male institution". This indicates a lack of balance.Ncox 01:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Its use in the article indicates clearly that it refers to the church as it was at the time, which was very much male-dominated. there has been a lot of change in the Anglican Church in the last few years. Have a look at (picking an article on the subject at random) this article to give some indication of the change. Grutness...wha? 23:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Penny Jamieson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]