Talk:Peter Marshall (Presbyterian minister)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Leonard LeSourd was not the founder of Guideposts magazine. I think LeSourd was the first Editor-In Chief of the magazine. Norman Vincent Peale and his wife Ruth Peale were the founders of the Guideposts magazine.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.131.130.25 (talk) 04:47, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Source Ref[edit]

i'm not one to trust my editing but here is some info that could be updated for those interested in doing so. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/6371302/peter-marshall — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.53.115.151 (talk) 09:07, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 March 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

– Both Peter Marshall (preacher) and Peter Marshall (priest) appear to be incomplete disambiguations. Both were Protestants, but that cannot be determined from either "(preacher)" or "(priest)". It would seem best to either describe their clerical affiliations in greater detail or simply describe each as a clergyman disambiguated by birth year. — Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 04:44, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Just to show that all choices of proposed titles above are indeed not pages with significant content, the choices for the first nom are Peter Marshall (Presbyterian pastor) or Peter Marshall (clergyman, born 1902); the choices for the second nom are Peter Marshall (Anglican priest) or Peter Marshall (clergyman, born 1940). P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 17:41, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support some move. The 1902 one gets 1,679 while the 1940 one only gets 44[[1]] so maybe the 1st could stay as a PDAB though I'm not sure this is enough so I'd just move both. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Peter Marshall (Presbyterian minister), which is the obvious and unambiguous disambiguator and what we usually use for nonconformist clergymen. The Anglican priest is the only priest (a term not used by Presbyterians), so doesn't need moving. However, priests are also ministers so the Presbyterian does need his denomination in there. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:24, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support this alternative. Ticks all the boxes. Andrewa (talk) 16:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Presbyterian minister but also support (Anglican priest). The concept of "priest" in Christianity is complicated, but suffice to say, Peter Marshall the Presbyterian certainly would have thought of himself as a priest and would have been considered one by his peers. The core distinctive of Presbyterianism (distinct from, say, the Anglican church) is that all believers are priests. The bare word (priest) does not effectively disambiguate the Anglican Peter Marshall. Red Slash 16:56, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Later Life heading[edit]

This is misleading paragraph title, Following it is all about his wife’s later life nothing about Marshalls HealthLibrarian (talk) 00:52, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]