Jump to content

Talk:Rampur, Uttar Pradesh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled]

[edit]

I've done what I can to improve the History of the City, but someone needs to add current political and economic information. I'm not really qualified. Sikandarji 17:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added Important Information

[edit]

I have added important information to the infobox like government changes, distances etc. Further more i have added Transportation, Education, Places of interest Sub headings. If any other place of interest or education is known to any other user he/she may add. This page needs more improvement. Thanks! Shawrix (talk) 10:31, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Please check the references, there are many "according to whom" in the article. Make sure that such sentences which seem to be opinion of someone, either do not exist or mentions who said it, with references.--GDibyendu (talk) 10:43, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Rampur, Uttar Pradesh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:22, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 November 2019

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move. (non-admin closure) Colin M (talk) 20:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

– Clearly WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. In Google Books search for "Rampur", all results returned are for Uttar Pradesh's Rampur. Apparently, no results there for places outside Uttar Pradesh which are also called Rampur. Also on Google search, and Google News, when "Rampur" is searched, virtually all of the results returned are for Uttar Pradesh's Rampur. Even if the disambiguator "Uttar Pradesh" with this title was meant to be used to difference this topic from Rampur district or the former Rampur State, then it does not disambiguate at all, because the city, and the district and former state named after it, all are located in present-day Uttar Pradesh. Khestwol (talk) 13:41, 5 November 2019 (UTC)—Relisted. – Ammarpad (talk) 06:04, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous with what? If Rampur State is recognizable enough to refer to the former state of which Rampur city was the capital, then I don't see how "Rampur" can not be recognizable enough. Khestwol (talk) 08:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 16 February 2020

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


– Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and Google Books search which returns results only for Uttar Pradesh's Rampur city (which this article is about). I think not enough discussion had taken place previously, because the only oppose !voter there did not even answer my logical question to him. I hope for more participation from people familiar with the topic. Khestwol (talk) 14:12, 16 February 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. Jerm (talk) 17:56, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Narky Blert. The analysis indeed shows that only Rampur city has a long-term significance as compared to anything else on the disambiguation page. Khestwol (talk) 02:31, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pageviews do not speak to long term significance. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:40, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, same as last time, highly ambiguous as revealed by the DAB page and googling. There are many "Rampur"s, both historically and currently. Many are not even in India. Rampur, Uttar Pradesh is not close to being the largest by population. Wikipedia does not cater just for readers interested in the most popular topics, and the proposed move would draw all Rampur-interested readers into this one specific topic. Those interested in other Rampurs will be obviously mis-serviced, and those interested in this Rampur are likely to have their mistaken belief of its dominance reinforced. On the other side, no reader interested in Rampur, Uttar Pradesh is the least bit inconvenienced by ", Uttar Pradesh" being in the title, in what would otherwise be title whitespace. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:54, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Have you checked the pageview analysis above? Khestwol (talk) 02:31, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is interesting, not reliable, and I suspect it is reflecting systematic bias. A careful look through the current article references (noting they need more work than the title, some references don't name the topic) reveals that almost always Rampur is used under the pre-established context of Uttar Pradesh. Too many places named Rampur are not in Uttar Pradesh, or even in India. Ghits have systematic bias for India over Nepal and Bangladesh. The systematic bias of cultural dominance should be resisted. Also, the page move helps no reader, but hurts the few readers interested in the foreign Rampurs. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:40, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Rampur in the historical literature, the Rampur of the Rohillas, of the Rampur hounds, of the Rampur Raza Library, is as much a reference to the principality, or the minor state, as it is to the village/town/city which was its so-called capital. This page move is a nonstarter, a waste of everyone's time. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 14:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:22, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Rampur,_Uttar_Pradesh&oldid=1212215874"