Talk:Roger That

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://planetill.com/2009/12/album-reveiw-young-money-we-are-young-money/
Triggered by \bplanetill\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 20:05, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

It was proposed in this section that Roger That (song) be renamed and moved to Roger That.

The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment.

Links: current log • target log

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus, not done. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:07, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Roger That (song) → Roger That – Wikipedia is not a dictionary. The hat note {{For}} can be used if needed, as "Roger that" is not the code, but simply "Roger". Relisted Hot Stop talk-contribs 03:48, 11 March 2014 (UTC) © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 05:17, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The policy is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, not WP:PRIMARYARTICLE. The primary topic for "roger that" is Roger#Radio_phraseology. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- No, it is "Roger". © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 21:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support, as the radio terminology would not be capitalized. bd2412 T 11:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - this has been happily at Roger That (song) since creation in 2010 without "(song)" preventing people looking for the song finding the song. books don't use Roger That that is true, but this is military/aviation code and anyone wanting to find roger that (see Google Books) won't be helped by Roger That appearing on the drop down box. Taking "(song)" off will be even worse for iPhone users. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- "Roger That" is not actually military/aviation code. "Roger" is. The "that" is merely a demonstrative pronoun appended to the term, and is no more part of the code than "Roger, will do". bd2412 T 17:01, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support. There are no other articles titled Roger That. As bd2412 says, the title is distinct from the radio usage per WP:DIFFCAPS. This is a WP:TWODABS situation between this song and Roger#Radio phraseology; a hat note can direct readers to Roger.--Cúchullain ^t/c 14:57, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There is a redirect at Roger that and disambiguation by capitalization is never a good idea. I am not convinced with either argument regarding "Roger that" and if there was consensus that it should redirect to this article I would be able to remove my objection. --Richhoncho (talk) 12:55, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.