The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
The article currently provides two links in the "Sources" section, neither of which are verifiable, at the moment. When I try to access the link to the subject's CV, I get a "Fatal Error" page, but I'm not removing it in the hopes that it's just a temporary glitch on the berkeley.edu site. When I try to access the other link for the "Contemporary Authors Online", I get a login page. Given this, I'm adding a "Refimprove" template to the article. Cheers! -- Bgpaulus (talk) 21:09, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:05, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. The nine-sentence stub for the sociologist is not the primary topic. —Roman Spinner(talk • contribs) 00:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and per Roman Spinner. I wonder, in fact, if it might be possible to have a bot identify similar cases, where there is a primary topic article and a disambiguation page for that title, but the topic occupying the base page name is a stub and/or has relatively few pageviews relative to other topics sharing the name. BD2412T 22:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. In terms of long-term significance as well as in terms of usage, none of the entries in the disambig page is predominant. --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 06:35, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
.jpg){kind=small}