Talk:Sarojini Naidu

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sarojini Naidu article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 13, 2020, February 13, 2022, and February 13, 2023.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

February 9 to 15, 2014

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

India: History / Politics High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as High-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Politics High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

University of Cambridge

This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge WikiProject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge articles

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Green: Women's Rights

This article was created or improved during the Women's Rights GA edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Green project in October 2021. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in GreenWikipedia:WikiProject Women in GreenTemplate:WikiProject Women in GreenWomen in Green articles

better photo for this article

There is a photo of Sarojini Naidu at one of the government websites, http://mea.gov.in/indiaperspective/2005/052005.pdf. I believe this will be a better photo for the infobox. Can someone transform and upload this photo? --Kedar (talk) 10:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gandhi quote

It's widely repeated that Sarojini Naidu once jokingly remarked it cost a great deal of money to keep Gandhi living in poverty. If the quote can be sourced, it would be good to include in the article. 24.125.38.175 (talk) 01:26, 26 October 2009 (UTC) R.E.D.[reply]

What's going on?

What's up with this article? I look at the history and I see the byte count going up and down like a yoyo. There's a 2 year old request to replace the photo with a "better" one, and yet the article has no photo at all! I can see the photo if I look back at previous versions. Have I stumbled upon another edit-war? This article was created in the ancient past of enWP, 2002, I believe, but there are only 2 entries on the Talk page, the most recent being 2009! Many conflicting edits, with zero discussion: looks to me like it's time for some protection/intervention. I suspect that the Discussion is being erased along with large portions of the article. Grow up, people! No one wins an edit war. This is a beautiful story about an important and influential person, and she doesn't deserve to be dishonored. When you contribute to Wikipedia, you MUST be prepared to see your work modified, even reverted. Get with the program. It's a process. Let the process operate.

the editor formerly known as the Ragityman69.171.187.81 (talk) 21:27, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

can you ppl let thm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.65.156.205 (talk) 05:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Is it possible to semi protect this page for today? It seems like the google doodle is drawing a lot of vandals and very little honest contributors. --Debastein (talk) 09:16, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Currently the article's lead section has citations and covers content which is not mentioned in the rest of the page. A lead section should summarise what the entire article says, since it's repeating content there is usually no need for citing it twice. The present content needs to be merged with the article and a brief summary needs to be written. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 February 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change "Her 135th Birthday (in 2014) was marked by a doodle on Google India's Homepage." to "Her 135th birth anniversary....." as it commemorates the date of her birth, and is the preferred term for someone who is deceased. 120.59.247.63 (talk) 14:13, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 16:15, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Sarojini Naidu in Bombay 1946.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:38, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Flag of the Indian National Congress.svg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:06, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WiG mini review

Hey, LEvalyn, thanks for working on this. It looks like you've made considerable improvement. Speaking entirely in a constructive spirit, I think a little more is necessary before this is GA material, though it's close. First, the remaining unsourced content needs to addressed. Second, some sources (not your main ones, but the ones in the article before you began) that need to be replaced: smartenglishnotes, streeshakti, filmsdivision, and the INC, are the ones that stand out. Third, since it looks like a lot of the content predated your involvement, you should at least spot-check those sources to see if they verify the content they are used for. Fourth, there's a rather long paragraph in the legacy section that throws together many ideas, including ones that probably belong in personal life, since they do not refer to Naidu's own legacy. Finally, and this may be trickiest; the "nonviolent resistance" section reads a little like a list of isolated facts; there's really no narrative thread. For such a prominent figure, there must be sources covering it in detail which can be used to frame the sub-section. I hope this feedback is useful; best of luck with the GAN. Feel free to ping me with questions, or if you want me to take another look. Vanamonde (Talk) 03:17, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vanamonde93, thank you for this feedback! It is very helpful in focusing my efforts as I get toward a final stretch -- I've been looking at this article for long enough, it was hard to see what was "fine" and what still does need addressing. I agree with all your points here, and will work my way through them before nominating for GA! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 18:33, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]