Jump to content

Template talk:Syrian civil war

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why is Wafa Sultan on the template?

[edit]

She is neither involved in the uprising nor in surpressing. She is just famous islamophobic author with Syrian ancestors... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.249.146.210 (talk) 17:50, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

People Section

[edit]

I did a major overhaul of the background/timeline section recently, but all the individuals in the 'people' section are just thrown into one hodge-podge mix currently. Could someone who understands the situation better than I please organise them somehow, perhaps by faction?--ERAGON (talk) 22:31, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 October 2020

[edit]

Add the following milita groups to the "Military and militias" section for Syrian government belligerents: - Eagles of the Whirlwind - Ba'ath Brigades - Lions of Hussein - Sootoro - Guardians of the Dawn - Arab Nationalist Guard 109.154.94.250 (talk) 12:56, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done No source provided. DrKay (talk) 15:38, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 August 2023

[edit]

Request to add Syrian civil war in popular culture under Related section. 223.25.74.34 (talk) 14:05, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 15:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Manually set parentheses for Islamic State and al-Qaeda+ are very difficult to parse

[edit]

The sections on 'Islamic State' and 'al-Qaeda and allies' include manually set opening and closing parentheses (). One top-level manually-set closing parenthesis for 'al-Qaeda+' seems to be missing, which illustrates the risk in doing this manually.

Is there any reason not to use

  • top-level 1
    • next-level 1.a
    • 1.b
      • 1.b.1
      • 1.b.2
    • 1.c

where the template rules set up all the parentheses automatically, so that this is rendered as top-level 1 (next-level 1.a dot 1.b (1.b.1 dot 1.b.2) dot 1.c)?

Independently, whether HTS is still "part of" al-Nusra in the Syrian context seems rather doubtful, except in the sense of a historical tree of which group emerged from which.

A related question is whether there is any sense in writing the relation between the groups as a hierarchy. Given that we do not have any guarantee of having accurate up-to-date sources for all of the relations between these groups, it's quite possible that the reliably sourced relations are inconsistent in the Venn diagram sense. Boud (talk) 22:38, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]