Tiled rendering

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Tiled rendering is the process of subdividing a 3D computer graphics image by a regular grid in image space and rendering each section of the grid, or tile, separately. The advantage to this design is that the amount of memory and bandwidth is reduced compared to immediate mode rendering systems that draw the entire frame at once. This has made tile rendering systems particularly common for low-power handheld device use. Tiled rendering is sometimes known as a "sort middle" architecture, because it performs the sorting of the geometry in the middle of the graphics pipeline instead of near the end.[1]

Basic concept[edit]

Creating a 3D image for display consists of a series of steps. First, the objects to be displayed are loaded into memory from individual models. The system then applies mathematical functions to transform the models into a common coordinate system, the world view. From this world view, a series of polygons (typically triangles) is created that approximates the original models as seen from a particular viewpoint, the camera. Next, a compositing system produces an image by rendering the triangles and applying textures to the outside. Textures are small images that are painted onto the triangles to produce realism. The resulting image is then combined with various special effects, and moved into a frame buffer, which video hardware then scans to produce the display. This basic conceptual layout is known as the display pipeline.

Each of these steps increases the amount of memory needed to hold the resulting image. By the time it reaches the end of the pipeline the images are so large that typical graphics card designs often use specialized high-speed memory and a very fast computer bus to provide the required bandwidth to move the image. This sort of support is possible on dedicated graphics cards, but as power and size budgets become more limited, providing enough bandwidth becomes expensive in design terms.

Tiled renderers address this concern by breaking down the image into sections known as tiles, and rendering each one separately. This reduces the amount of memory needed during the intermediate steps, and the amount of data being moved about at any given time. To do this, the system sorts the triangles making up the geometry by location, allowing to quickly find which triangles overlap the tile boundaries. It then loads just those triangles into the rendering pipeline, performs the various rendering operations in the GPU, and sends the result to the frame buffer. Very small tiles can be used, 16×16 and 32×32 pixels are popular tile sizes, which makes the amount of memory and bandwidth required in the internal stages small as well. And because each tile is independent, it naturally lends itself to simple parallelization.

In a typical tiled renderer, geometry must first be transformed into screen space and assigned to screen-space tiles. This requires some storage for the lists of geometry for each tile. In early tiled systems, this was performed by the CPU, but all modern hardware contains hardware to accelerate this step. The list of geometry can also be sorted front to back, allowing the GPU to use hidden surface removal to avoid processing pixels that are hidden behind others, saving on memory bandwidth for unnecessary texture lookups.[2]

There are two main disadvantages of the tiled approach. One is that some triangles may be drawn several times if they overlap several tiles. This means the total rendering time would be higher than an immediate-mode rendering system. There are also possible issues when the tiles have to be stitched together to make a complete image, but this problem was solved long ago. More difficult to solve is that some image techniques are applied to the frame as a whole, and these are difficult to implement in a tiled render where the idea is to not have to work with the entire frame. These tradeoffs are well known, and of minor consequence for systems where the advantages are useful; tiled rendering systems are widely found in handheld computing devices.

Tiled rendering should not be confused with tiled/nonlinear framebuffer addressing schemes, which make adjacent pixels also adjacent in memory.[3] These addressing schemes are used by a wide variety of architectures, not just tiled renderers.

Early work[edit]

Much of the early work on tiled rendering was done as part of the Pixel Planes 5 architecture (1989).[4][5]

The Pixel Planes 5 project validated the tiled approach and invented a lot of the techniques now viewed as standard for tiled renderers. It is the work most widely cited by other papers in the field.

The tiled approach was also known early in the history of software rendering. Implementations of Reyes rendering often divide the image into "tile buckets".

Commercial products – Desktop and Console[edit]

Early in the development of desktop GPUs, several companies developed tiled architectures. Over time, these were largely supplanted by immediate-mode GPUs with fast custom external memory systems.

Major examples of this are:

Examples of non-tiled architectures that use large on-chip buffers are:

  • Xbox 360 (2005): the GPU contains an embedded 10 MiB eDRAM; this is not sufficient to hold the raster for an entire 1280×720 image with 4× multisample anti-aliasing, so a tiling solution is superimposed when running in HD resolutions and 4× MSAA is enabled.[9]
  • Xbox One (2013): the GPU contains an embedded 32 MiB eSRAM, which can be used to hold all or part of an image. It is not a tiled architecture, but is flexible enough that software developers can emulate tiled rendering.[10][not in citation given]

Commercial products – Embedded[edit]

Due to the relatively low external memory bandwidth, and the modest amount of on-chip memory required, tiled rendering is a popular technology for embedded GPUs. Current examples include:

Tile-based immediate mode rendering (TBIM):

Tile-based deferred rendering (TBDR):

Vivante produces mobile GPUs which have tightly coupled frame buffer memory (similar to the Xbox 360 GPU described above). Although this can be used to render parts of the screen, the large size of the rendered regions means that they are not usually described as using a tile-based architecture.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Molnar, Steven (1994-04-01). "A Sorting Classification of Parallel Rendering" (PDF). IEEE. Retrieved 2012-08-24. 
  2. ^ "PowerVR: A Master Class in Graphics Technology and Optimization" (PDF). Imagination Technologies. 2012-01-14. Retrieved 2014-01-11. 
  3. ^ Deucher, Alex (2008-05-16). "How Video Cards Work". X.Org Foundation. Retrieved 2010-05-27. 
  4. ^ Mahaney, Jim (1998-06-22). "History". Pixel-Planes. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Retrieved 2008-08-04. 
  5. ^ Fuchs, Henry (1989-07-01). "Pixel-planes 5: a heterogeneous multiprocessor graphics system using processor-enhanced memories". Pixel-Planes. ACM. Retrieved 2012-08-24. 
  6. ^ Smith, Tony (1999-10-06). "GigaPixel takes on 3dfx, S3, Nvidia with... tiles". Gigapixel. The Register. Retrieved 2012-08-24. 
  7. ^ mestour, mestour (2011-07-21). "Develop 2011: PS Vita is the most developer friendly hardware Sony has ever made". PS Vita. 3dsforums. Retrieved 2011-07-21. 
  8. ^ Kanter, David (August 1, 2016). "Tile-based Rasterization in Nvidia GPUs". Real World Technologies. Retrieved April 1, 2016. 
  9. ^ http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb464139.aspx
  10. ^ http://www.neowin.net/news/xbox-one-developer-upcoming-sdk-improvements-will-allow-for-more-1080p-games
  11. ^ "Mali rendering strategy". ARM. 
  12. ^ "An update on the freedreno graphics driver". lwn.net. 
  13. ^ "The rise of mobile gaming on android" (PDF). Qualcomm. p. 5. Retrieved 17 September 2015. 
  14. ^ "A look at the PowerVR graphics architecture: Tile-based rendering". Imagination Technologies. 
  15. ^ "VideoCoreIV-AG100" (PDF). Broadcom. 2013-09-18.