Jump to content

User talk:Megalibrarygirl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

To leave me a new message you may click here.


Women in Red's April+Further with Art+Feminism 2018

[edit]
Please join us as Women in Red and Art+Feminism continue our collaboration in April 2018. Continue the work you've done in March and pledge to help close the gender gap in April! All you need to do is sign up on the Meet-Up page below and list any articles you create in the month of April.


April+Further with Art+Feminism

To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred

April editathons at Women in Red

[edit]

January 2020 at Women in Red

[edit]
January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153


Happy Holidays from all of us at Women in Red, and thank you for your support in 2019. We look forward to working with you in 2020!

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

WAM 2019 Postcard: All postcards are postponed due to the postal system shut down

[edit]
Wikipedia Asian Month 2019
Wikipedia Asian Month 2019

Dear all participants and organizers,

Since the outbreak of COVID-19, all the postcards are postponed due to the shut down of the postal system all over the world. Hope all the postcards can arrive as soon as the postal system return and please take good care.

Best regards,

Wikipedia Asian Month International Team 2020.03


Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

[edit]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap fillers - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Wikipedia Asian Month 2020

[edit]
Wikipedia Asian Month 2020
Wikipedia Asian Month 2020

Hi WAM organizers and participants!

Hope you are all doing well! Now is the time to sign up for Wikipedia Asian Month 2020, which will take place in this November.

For organizers:

Here are the basic guidance and regulations for organizers. Please remember to:

  1. use Fountain tool (you can find the usage guidance easily on meta page), or else you and your participants’ will not be able to receive the prize from WAM team.
  2. Add your language projects and organizer list to the meta page before October 29th, 2020.
  3. Inform your community members WAM 2020 is coming soon!!!
  4. If you want WAM team to share your event information on Facebook / twitter, or you want to share your WAM experience/ achievements on our blog, feel free to send an email to info@asianmonth.wiki or PM us via facebook.

If you want to hold a thematic event that is related to WAM, a.k.a. WAM sub-contest. The process is the same as the language one.

For participants:

Here are the event regulations and Q&A information. Just join us! Let’s edit articles and win the prizes!

Here are some updates from WAM team:

  1. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this year we hope all the Edit-a-thons are online not physical ones.
  2. The international postal systems are not stable enough at the moment, WAM team have decided to send all the qualified participants/ organizers extra digital postcards/ certifications. (You will still get the paper ones!)
  3. Our team has created a meta page so that everyone tracking the progress and the delivery status.

If you have any suggestions or thoughts, feel free to reach out the WAM team via emailing info@asianmonth.wiki or discuss on the meta talk page. If it’s urgent, please contact the leader directly (jamie@asianmonth.wiki).

Hope you all have fun in Wikipedia Asian Month 2020

Sincerely yours,

Wikipedia Asian Month International Team 2020.10

Merry Christmas

[edit]
A Shaker Christmas wish
Give good gifts, one to another
Peace, joy and comfort gladly bestow
Harbor no ill 'gainst sister or brother
Smooth life's journey as you onward go.
Broad as the sunshine, free as the showers.
So shed an influence blessing to prove;
Give for the noblest of efforts your pow'rs;
Blest and be blest, is the law of love.

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

[edit]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap fillers - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

[edit]

Hello Megalibrarygirl,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

  • There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
  • Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
  • Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
  • This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

[edit]

Hello Megalibrarygirl,

New Page Review queue December 2022
Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023

[edit]

Hello Megalibrarygirl,

New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

New article review

[edit]

In the draft of the proposed article Tabular Byzantine calendar sent to you a mistake in the source led to the lengths of the lunar months being incorrectly stated. Please amend paragraph 5 to read:

Here is the full text. If you can review, open the page in mainspace and copy/paste the following it will be so much appreciated.

The tabular Byzantine calendar is used to calculate the date of Easter. It dates back to AD 284, when the new moon fell on the sixth epagemonal day of the Alexandrian calendar (29 August). Eusebius (vii.32) recounts that Anatolius of Laodicea was the first to arrange the 19-years cycle (when the new moon returns to the same Julian date) for ecclesiastical purposes. Anatolius says that he places the new moon of the first year of his cycle on the Alexandrian equivalent of 22 March, the day of the vernal equinox. In the Julian calendar, the equinox recedes at the rate of 1 day in 128 years; by the time of the First Council of Nicaea in AD 325 it was falling on 21 March. 22 March is 26 Phamenoth in the Alexandrian calendar.

The lunar new year was not allowed to begin before 15 Thoth (12 September, or 13 September if the following February has 29 days), and the month in which Easter fell was not allowed to begin before 12 Phamenoth (8 March). As the paschal full moon (the full moon before Easter), like all full moons is assigned to the 14th day of the lunar month, its earliest date was thus 25 Phamenoth (21 March), and Easter fell at earliest on 26 Phamenoth (22 March) and at latest on 30 Pharmouthi (25 April). The month in which Easter fell could thus begin no later than 10 Pharmouthi (5 April) and the Easter full moon could fall no later than 18 April (23 Pharmouthi).

If, at the end of the twelfth lunar month, the next lunar month would begin before 15 Thoth, an additional 30-day month was inserted. This caused Easter to jump forward in years 3, 6, 9, 11, 14, 17 and 19 of the cycle. The lunar date of the sixth epagemonal day (considered the first day of a leap year) was the same as that of the previous day. The Alexandrian months, all of thirty days, are:

1. Thoth
2. Phaophi
3. Athyr
4. Choiac
5. Tybi
6. Mechir
7. Phamenoth
8. Pharmouthi
9. Pachom
10. Payni
11. Epiphi
12. Mesore

The first lunar month had 29 days, and following lunar months had 30 and 29 days alternately. Thus the sixth lunar month, preceding the one in which Easter fell, had 30 days, minimising the chance of Easter clashing with Passover. This calendar uses the Callippic cycle of 76 years, under which the lunar year averages 365.25 days. But with this arrangement the lunar year averages 366.25 days. Therefore, in cycle 19, when the eleventh lunar month began on 7 Mesore and had 29 days, the next month (beginning on 1 Thoth) also had 29 days (saltus lunae) and the first month of the new lunar year began on 30 Thoth. In the sixth century, after it accepted that it no longer mattered if the birthday of Rome (23 April) fell within Lent, the Roman church abandoned its own calculation (the Supputatio Romana) for the Alexandrian one. This involved recasting the lunar months so that their first days were given in terms of the Julian calendar. While Easter continued to jump forward in years 3, 6, 8, 11, 14, 17 and 19 of the cycle the extra months were more equitably spaced, generally being hidden within those Julian months which contained two new moons. Their starting dates were:

Cycle 3 - 1 January
Cycle 5 - 2 September
Cycle 8 - 6 March
Cycle 11 - 3 January
Cycle 13 - 31 December
Cycle 16 - 1 September
Cycle 19 - 5 March

In addition to its error of 1 day in 128 years as regards the sun the Julian calendar had an error of 1 day in 308 years as regards the moon in the same direction - thus by 1582 the actual new moons were falling three days earlier than their tabulated dates. Pope Gregory XIII wanted to reform the calendar, which he did by decreeing that most centennial years would not be leap years. He also brought the tabular equinox back to 21 March by omitting the ten days 5 to 14 October 1582. He decided that Easter would continue to fall between 22 March and 25 April in his new calendar, which posed a problem - the First Council of Arles in AD 314 had decreed that Easter would be observed by all on the same day, so it was not open to him to change it unilaterally. Also the First Council of Nicaea in AD 325 had decreed that the Easter full moon must not fall before the equinox and the tables were constructed to agree as nearly as possible with the Jewish calendar - in fact after they were constructed in the third century they were declared to be a more accurate version of the Jewish calendar than the one the Jews themselves were using.[1] Gregory got round that by lying - claiming that the Council had decreed that Easter would be the Sunday after the first full moon after the equinox. The result was that instead of falling during the Passover Easter began to fall more and more frequently within the last Jewish month. This could not be more unfortunate, because the full moon of that month is marked by the rumbustious festival of Purim, which could not be less appropriate for the solemnities of Holy Week. Hence the surreal situation in Stamford Hill on Palm Sunday, 24 March 2024, when a small Muslim boy, watching the Purim festivities, asked his mother "Is it Easter?" to which she replied "No. Easter is Jesus Christ. It is completely different."

Gregory moved the new moons back three days, to make them agree with the real new moons. To keep them in agreement, he instituted the "lunar correction", whereby they are shifted back 1 day 8 times in 2500 years. The next 8 adjustments will occur on 1 March of the years 2100, 2400, 2700, 3000, 3300, 3600, 3900 and 4300. While Gregory decreed that the "solar correction" (the omission of a centennial leap day) occur 3 times in 400 years, this only reduces the backward movement of the equinox to 1 day in 3323 years. Orthodox churches instead apply the correction 7 times in 900 years, keeping the calendar correct to one day in 44,000 years. In the Exigian calendar the rule is that a centennial year is only a leap year if it gives remainder 200 or 700 when divided by 900. The first centennial leap year was 1600 and the second 2000. This arrangement means that when the calendar is projected beyond the Christian era the rule is the same - thus the first two centennial leap years were -200 (201 BC) and -700 (701 BC).[2] It also minimises the number of occasions on which the dates of the new moons are moved in a centennial year. As the solar correction moves them forward a day and the lunar correction moves them back a day, when these corrections coincide (e.g. in 2100, 2400 and 2700) they stay where they are.

The names of the lunar months are as follows:

1. Harriet (29 days)
2. Ronan (30 days)
3. Miri (29 days - Orthodox Easter (except in the Finnish Orthodox Church) always falls in this month)
4. James (30 days)
5. Eloise (29 days)
6. Thomas (30 days)
vii (29 days)
8. Nicholas (30 days)
9. Catherine (29 days)
10. Richard (30 days - 29 in cycle 19, when the saltus lunae is applied)
11 Emma (29 days)
12 Paul (30 days)

Seven times in 19 years an additional 30 day month (Paul II) occurs between Paul and Harriet. To aid use (in religious houses the lunar date of the following day is announced daily at Lauds after the reading of the Martyrology) months commemorating female saints have 29 days and months commemorating male saints (apart from the saltus lunae) have 30 days. The repetition of the lunar date on the leap day is preserved - thus 28 February 2028 is 3 Ronan bis, 29 February is 3 Ronan and 1 March is 4 Ronan. In houses where the leap day continues to be placed between 23 and 24 February the sequence is modified accordingly. The derivation of the names is as follows:

(1) Harriet is a diminutive of Henrietta. Wife of Charles I, she was the ancestor of several monarchs.
(2) St Ronan was a key figure in the implementation of a common Easter date at the Synod of Whitby in 664.
(3) Miri is a contraction of Mariam, the given name of the Mother of God.
(4), (6), (12) James, Thomas and Paul were apostles.
(5) Héloïse was an abbess who reached a rank equivalent to that of Bishop.
(8), (9) Nicholas and Catherine are well-known saints.
(10) Richard I, known as Coeur de Lyon, was instrumental in recovering the Holy Land from the Saracens.
(11) Emma was the mother of Edward the Confessor.
(13) Paul II was Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople 641-653, and a Pope of that name reigned 1464-1471.

Occidental Easter generally falls between 15 and 21 Miri, on whichever day is Sunday. There are three exceptions:

(1) If 14 Miri falls on 18 April and a golden number is marked against 6 April, Easter falls on 18 April (if Sunday) and otherwise on the Sunday following 18 April. The golden number marks the year's position in the 19-year cycle and is placed in the calendar against the first days of the lunar months.

(2) If 14 Miri falls on 19 April Easter falls on 19 April (if Sunday) and otherwise on the Sunday following 19 April.

(3) If 14 Miri falls on 20 April or later the date against which it stands is to be treated as a day of March and Easter falls on the day after the Saturday following that date.

Example calculation

On what date does occidental Easter fall in 2025?

2025 + 1 = 2026; 2026/19 = 106 remainder 12. The golden number is 12. In the calendar, 12 (marking 1 Miri) stands against 31 March. The dominical letter is E. This is placed against all the Sundays in the year. A leap year has two dominical letters, one for January and February and the other (one place back in the series) for March to December. Easter falls on 20 April because that is an E day and the date, 21 Miri, lies between 15 and 21 Miri (inclusive).

Orthodox Easter does not admit the lunar correction. Therefore, when Gregory moved the new moons back three days Orthodox Easter fell between 18 and 24 Miri. Another correction in 1800 means that until 2099 Orthodox Easter falls between 19 and 25 Miri, and so on. As 20 April is 21 Miri, Orthodox Easter falls on that day.

LUNAR CALENDAR 1 MARCH 1900 - 28 FEBRUARY 2200

JAN
Paul
30
FEB
Harr
29
MAR
Ron
30
APR
Miri
29
MAY
Jame
30
JUN
Eloi
29
JUL
Thom
30
AUG
vii
29
SEPT
Nich
30
OCT
Cath
29
NOV
Rich
30
DEC
Emma
29
1 A 12 d 1 d 12 g 1 b e 9 g c 17 f A d 3 f 3
2 b 1 e e 1 A c 9 f A 17 d 6 g 14 b 14 e g
3 c f 9 f b 9 d g 17 b 6 e A 3 c 3 f 11 A 11
4 d 9 g g 9 c e 17 A 6 c f 14 b d g b 19
5 e P2 A 17 A d 17 f 6 b d 14 g 3 c 11 e 11 A 19 c
6 f 17 b 6 b 17 e 6 g c 14 e 3 A d f b 8 d 8
7 g 6 c c 6 f A 14 d 3 f b 11 e 19 g 19 c Em e 16
8 A d 14 d g 14 b 3 e g 11 c f 8 A 8 d 16 f 5
9 b 14 e 3 e 14 A 3 c f 11 A d 19 g Ca b 16 e 5 g
10 c 3 f f 3 b d 11 g b 19 e 8 A 16 c 5 f A 13
11 d g 11 g c 11 e A 19 c 8 f 16 b 5 d g 13 b 2
12 e 11 A A 11 d f 19 b 8 d vii g 5 c e 13 A 2 c
13 f b 19 b e 19 g 8 c 16 e 16 A d 13 f 2 b d 10
14 g 19 c 8 c 19 f 8 A El d 5 f 5 b 13 e 2 g c 10 e
15 A 8 d 16 d 8 g 16 b 16 e g c 2 f A 10 d f 18
16 b Ha e 5 e Mi A 5 c 5 f 13 A 13 d g 10 b e 18 g 7
17 c 16 f f 16 b d g 2 b 2 e 10 A c 18 f 7 A
18 d 5 g 13 g 5 c 13 e 13 A c f b 18 d 7 g b 15
19 e A 2 A d 2 f 2 b 10 d 10 g 18 c 7 e A 15 c 4
20 f 13 b b 13 e g c e A 7 d f 15 b 4 d
21 g 2 c 10 c 2 f 10 A 10 d 18 f 18 b e 15 g 4 c e 12
22 A d d g b e 7 g 7 c 15 f 4 A d 12 f 1
23 b 10 e 18 e 10 A 18 c 18 f A d 4 g b 12 e 1 g
24 c f 7 f b 7 d 7 g 15 b 15 e A 12 c 1 f A 9
25 d 18 g g 18 c e A 4 c 4 f 12 b 1 d g 9 b
26 e 7 A 15 A 7 d 15 f 15 b d g 1 c e 9 A c 17
27 f b 4 b e 4 g 4 c 12 e 12 A d 9 f b 17 d 6
28 g 15 c c 15 f A d 1 f 1 b 9 e g 17 c 6 e
29 A 4 d 4 g 12 b 12 e g c f 17 A 6 d f 14
30 b e A 1 c 1 f 9 A 9 d 17 g 6 b e 14 g 3
31 c 12 f 12 d b e 6 c 14 A
Harr Ron Miri Jame Eloi Thom vii Nich Cath Rich Emma Paul

Secular use

[edit]

The calendar may be used to locate the approximate position of the moon at any time. There are innumerable applications.

Tidal predictions

[edit]

The "establishment" of a port is approximately the time between the moon's meridian passage (above and below the horizon) and high water. Tidal range is greatest in the middle and at the end of the lunar month ("spring tides") and at the equinoxes. For accurate predictions use official tables. An example calculation follows.

Nocturnal illumination

[edit]

It is 9 PM Greenwich Mean Time in London on 15 February 2024. The golden number is 11, which is printed against 11 February. This is the lunar new year (1 Harriet) and 15 February is therefore 5 Harriet. At the end of the previous month (as at the end of every lunar month) the sun and moon are together in the sky, but the lunar day is on average 4/5 hour longer than the solar day. Thus at 9 PM it is only 5 PM by the moon. Whether the moon is visible at that time may be determined using the fact that the moon moves through the zodiac at the rate of 13.2° per day (compared to 1° per day for the sun). On 15 February (5 Harriet) the moon will have advanced (5 x (13.2 - 1)) = 5 x 12.2 = about 61° ahead of the sun. So it will be where the sun will be about 61 days later, i.e. around 16 April.

But there is another factor. The moon's ascending node (where the plane of its orbit crosses the ecliptic in a northerly direction) moves backwards, completing a circuit relative to the equinox in 18.6 years. When the longitude is 0° (which it will reach around 29 January 2025) it reaches a maximum of 5° further from the celestial equator than does the sun (the major standstill). Half a revolution later (the minor standstill) it reaches a maximum of 5° nearer to the celestial equator than does the sun.

So considering the moon's position at 9 PM on 15 February 2024 we look where the sun would be at 5 PM on 16 April and (since the date is fairly close to the major standstill) a little higher in the sky. The moon was thus looked for (and was seen) high in the west.

Eclipse prediction

[edit]

The calendar may be used to predict eclipses. As the node revolves through 360° in 18.6 years, each month it will retrograde about ((360/18.6)/12)° = 1.61°. As the ascending node reaches 0° around 29 January 2025, in September 2024 its longitude is around 6° and the descending node (directly opposite) is around 186°. The sun reaches ecliptic longitude 186° around 30 September. There will be a lunar eclipse if the full moon (usually on the 14th of the lunar month) occurs within 13 days either side of the sun passing through either node. For solar eclipses (at the end of the lunar month) the "eclipse season" is 19 days either side of the sun's passage through a node. The nearer to the node the sun is the greater the eclipse will be. In 2024, 14 Nicholas corresponds to 18 September. As this is just within the eclipse season there will be a small partial eclipse. This reaches a maximum at 02:44 GMT when 8.5% of the disc is obscured. On 28 Nicholas, when the sun is very close to the node, the annular solar eclipse of October 2, 2024 occurs. If the solar eclipse occurs within 11 days of the sun passing through the node (as here) it will be central (total or annular). As the "eclipse season" is longer than a lunar month there will always be at least one eclipse every time the sun passes through a node, which it does on average every 173.2979 days

Administrative uses

[edit]

As virtually all religions use lunar calendars, the calendar aids in planning rest days in for example conferences attended by members of different faiths. The Jewish Passover almost always occurs during Miri, and the High Holy Days almost always occur during Catherine.

Source: International Commission for Anglican-Orthodox Theological Dialogue (Metropolitan Athenagoras of Belgium, The Rt Revd Graham Usher, Bishop of Norwich), The prospect of Whitby (2022, 22 pp.) Norwich Cathedral Library, Norwich, Norfolk, England.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Karl Joseph von Hefele (trans. William R Clark) (1894). A history of the councils of the Church. Edinburgh. p. 325.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  2. ^ Cassidy, Simon (25 October 1996). "Re: How long is a year..EXACTLY? East Carolina University Calendar discussion List CALNDR-L". Retrieved 1 September 2024.

Women’s Political Union?

[edit]

HI MG, I am writing an article about Josephine Bicknell Neal. The article in ANB states she was a member of the Women’s Political Union. Are you familiar with this organization? I think it is an early 20th cent. group. Maybe some connection to Political Equality League or the Equality League or the Equality League of Self-Supporting Women. It would make sense that she belonged to an organization in NYC. I am perplexed not to find anything on Wikipedia.

At your convenience could you have a think? Thanks. Best, WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:14, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WomenArtistUpdates! This is part of why I have been putting off working on Women's suffrage in New York (state)! So much was happening, that it's confusing. According to the SI, the Women's Political Union was created by Harriot Stanton Blatch and was formally called the Equality League of Self-Supporting Women.[1][2] And there is a list of members here. Because NJ is really close, there was a Women's Political Union of New Jersey founded by Mina C. Van Winkle. The New York branch of the WPU would join the Congressional Union. So to me, these groups are all pretty closely connected (or even the same thing sometimes). And when you are searching in news from the time, sometimes the newspaper will refer to the group with its old name, so that's super confusing as well! Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:54, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Megalibrarygirl. This confirms what I suspected. Sounds like NY was a major place for development of the movement with small nuances of attitude. I shall put Equality League of Self-Supporting Women on my list of possible articles. Meanwhile, do you think it should be a redirect to Harriot Stanton Blatch#Suffrage_campaigns? Best, --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 19:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think that's a great idea, WomenArtistUpdates. Eventually, it can be fleshed out. I've been putting off doing NY and Washington DC because of all of the activity that happened in both places. It's very intense and confusing sometimes! Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:03, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

[edit]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

[edit]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

[edit]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:23, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Marie Tomanova Draft Deleted

[edit]

Hi Megalibrarygirl,


I seem to have had some issues getting a bio on artist Marie Tomanova published and, in fact, it was deleted. It was suggested in a link that I contact any user on a list to get it moved or reinstated. Could you help me with that? And maybe give me some advice or guiadance?

Thank you,

W

```` Wenncesslas (talk) 11:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wenncesslas! I went over to the article, but I couldn't see where it was deleted. Am I spelling this correctly: Marie Tomanova? Do you need additional sources? Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:06, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Megalibrarygirl,
Thank you for your response. Perhaps it is called: Draft:Marie Tomanova. It was deleted, as indicated in the copy/paste from the log below at the end of this message. I am a tad concerned/confused by this Wiki experience so far and I would love any help to follow protocol and get this published. My understanding is that I was submitting a working draft, not a final, and thus some things were going to be cleaned up. Of greater concern is the assertion of lack of notablilty, esp. not supported by reliable sources. My feeling is a personage with a NYT feature, the subject of an HBO documentary, and three monographs, and an international solo exhibiton record is enough evidence of notablility. I would certainly appreciate any and all help and, of course, I would love citation help if you have time and energy.
If possible to undelete, so that I may continue to work and refine, I would appreciate it very much. If possible, where then would I have access to that?
Warmly,
W
Wenncesslas (talk) 17:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Wenncesslas! I took a look at the draft. Since she's the subject of a documentary and is published with some reviews, it seems like she might be notable. However, I can see why the article was seen as promotional and probably a copyright violation. It will need a lot of cleanup to be more neutral and to align with Wikipedia standards. As a new editor, it's important to learn how to write in a neutral way on Wikipedia. Have you thought about working on other articles first to get a good handle on editing? I can restore a draft to your userspace where you will have more time to work on your skills. If I restore the draft, I'll be removing promotional material, so you can see how that works, too. Let me know if you want to continue your work on Tomanova. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear MegalibraryGirl,
Thank you for your response and I would love to have the draft restored on Tomanova, so that I may take your advice and edit accordingly with accepted protocols. I appreciate your help and guidance and will do as your suggested. May I ask for your opinion on next draft?
Warmly,
W
90.182.180.170 (talk) 08:17, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Again,
Thank you!
Wenncesslas (talk) 09:17, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I removed promotional material and did some ref cleanup. Let me know if you need more help! Keep the tone neutral! :) User:Wenncesslas/Marie Tomanova Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:57, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:Megalibrarygirl - It is not necessary to move problematic drafts from draft space into user space, and it complicates the review process. Please leave problematic drafts in draft space, and either comment on them, or improve them, or leave them alone. When problematic articles are found in article space, they are moved to draft space, which is where problematic pages can be worked on. Please don't move the drafts of other editors into user space. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Robert McClenon: I know it's not necessary. In this case, I found the situation to be non-routine, so I deemed it best to go into Userspace, rather than Draftspace. Because this is a new user, they can have more time to work on the article and be able to make sure the article is good before they resubmit the draft. The history is still included. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:06, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

[edit]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]