User talk:Horvat Den

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Horvat Den, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --PaxEquilibrium 11:00, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Romanians population figures[edit]

Hello Horvat Den! First I would like to thank you a lot for your understanding the figures problem in the article Romanians. You were the first to really understand what is the truth. Before, we, a couple of Romanian users we were trying to solve this problem by adding reliable sources to proove what we were saying. However, almost every of us got banned, including me.Since im blocked, please continue to defend the article as much as you can. I have some sources if you need them just contact me. There's no way that the figure gets lower than 28 mil. Thank you again! Regards, Arthur 14 October 2006

Hi Horvat. I guess if you outline your reasons on the talk page, and try to come to a compromise with people, then things will work out. Constantzeanu can be a reasonable guy, I'm sure you'll be able to agree on something. Just make sure to cite reliable sources. —Khoi khoi 16:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Number changes[edit]

Den, would you please start discussing your changes of population numbers at various articles? You change Croats every while, although the numbers are sourced and explained in the article. I guess you didn't even take a look what the article Montenegrins is about. Yes, many of those number are "inflated" as, depending on level of diaspora, they tend to include great-grandchildren who don't even speak the original language anymore (go see Irish people for a real inflation). The case is moot one way or another, but your crusade doesn't help resolving it. Duja^► 10:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mesaselimovic.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mesaselimovic.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:07, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers[edit]

Sure. Let me know what I should do. Dahn 13:59, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The first source goes against the offivcial census in Moldova; it also says that "over 2 million [live] in the United States of America and Canada" - when these two million are likely to be ethnic Romanians and non-ethnics alike. Dahn 14:02, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Same for the second source.The fourth source counts citizens and their foreign descendants overall, and probably counts hundreds of thousands twice. Dahn 14:04, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The fifth source, beside being biased (and, IMO, unauthorative), goes with the highest number possible, and then some. They do not indicate a reason behind this count, and do not say why it is two million over the highest estimate in all those other sources... Dahn 14:07, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The final one unwittingly explains in itself the source of errors: it again counts six million ethnics and non-ethnics alike outside of Romania; the four million "around Romania's borders" (I always enjoy the relativity of this repetitive formula) include the POV on the results of the Moldovan census. Dahn 14:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Note: the above are in reference to the sources the article uses for the total number - that is, those referenced right after the "28 million" mention. I have not looked through the other references, but I think even more flaws are present there, and those flaws also contradict the number given for Romanians inside Romania) Dahn 15:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would rather discuss about hte recent issues with the numbers of Croats. --PaxEquilibrium 14:17, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, what's your take on this? Khoi khoi 02:03, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to be sourced...what we need are sources for the 21 mil. figure. Do you have any? Khoi khoi 22:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But you can't add up the numbers by yourself, that would be original research. If there are really 21 million Romanians in the world, can't we find at least one source that say so? Khoi khoi 02:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. Just saying, "this is what it is" doesn't help. Khoi khoi 02:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I see what you mean now. You might consider adding your comments to Talk:Romanians. Cheers, Khoi khoi 02:30, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah... :-) Khoi khoi 02:36, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Barnutiu.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Barnutiu.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MECU≈talk 23:53, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Population Numbers[edit]

Hi. In response to your comment about the numbers of Romanians, I agree that the number includes 3'rd generation Romanians that now live in places other then Romania, Moldova, Vojvodina or Chernivtsi Oblast, however that 28 million is a figure that is backed by many, many sources, as you can see. And it is not clear from those sources that this number really includes non-ethnic Romanians. Nevertheless, I would have no problem changing that figure, however it is very important that the new figure is backed by a reliable reference (preferably two). If you could find one, please let me know and we will do the change, but so far, although I have tried, I could not find one. Also as you can see, right now we have a minimum number of 21.5 and a max, the 28 million. Personally I find that ok since it leaves room for the reader to judge which figure represents the real number. However, if you intend to erase the 28 million figure(the max), then the minimum (21.5) should go down too.

Secondly, I do not want to touch the issue of the Moldovans. As you can see, right now, the table is very well done as it shows exactly the numbers of Moldovans and Timok Vlachs in brackets, with links provided for both groups in case the reader is curious to find out about the background of these two. There was a long ongoing dispute over these two issues and this formula was devised in order to please both the Neo-Stalinist view about a separate Moldovan identity as well as the view that Moldovans are a subgroup of Romanians. With the format existing right now, the reader has the freedom to judge for herself/himself what Moldovans are.

Dapiks 14:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Barnutiu.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:Barnutiu.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 20:25, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, that is not legit at all in fact. The Joshua project is totally not reliable - since they are obviously incorrect: even when you add people who reported that they are full-romanians, you get 21.5 mil (the minimum on the Romanians article) and that is not counting the Moldovans, which are Romanians (despite what the Stalinist-Voronist communist propaganda says). So if 21.5 million includes full Romanians, then the Joshua project is clearly wrong to report 21 mil. for 1/2 romanians as well. Cheers.Dapiks 22:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Alexey Bogolyubov, was selected for DYK![edit]

On February 9, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alexey Bogolyubov, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid 64 15:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This needs to be solved[edit]

I have taken the "List of Companies" problem (what to do with an entire class of articles that get repeatedly submitted for deletion en mass?) for debate to two different places. This really needs to be solved once and for all (we can't keep debating the same stuff for eternity). Would you take a look at either the discussion on the Village Pump or the relevant wikiproject? Aditya Kabir 15:49, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:DervinPYM1933.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:DervinPYM1933.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chebotarevimage.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Chebotarevimage.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Krymov selfi portrait.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Krymov selfi portrait.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:IntheCanteen1932.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:IntheCanteen1932.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CNoica.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:CNoica.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Polish American[edit]

Yeah, sorry. I screwed that up. Regardless, the image is not properly sourced for the article, so it needs to be removed or replaced in the template. Bulldog123 19:11, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't the best source, but I did some more research Mike Krzyzewski is acceptable. Glad you agree with the rest. Bulldog123 19:53, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but is Martha Stewart really a great representative of Polish-American? There's honestly nobody better? Bulldog123 20:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You want to do something about whats going on at Polish Americans? Basically all the absurd images are back. I think we're on the same page. Hopefully? Bulldog123 18:31, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you're happy[edit]

I've been a regular editor here for 17 months, and up to now I've gotten along perfectly well with everyone. Until you show up - not because of any interest in Adam Lambert but as a crony for your bulldog friend - and orchestrate a thoroughly planned and devilishly effective smear campaign. You've rubbed my Wiki-reputation through the mud, and all I did was try to maintain NPOV and combat the edit warring of an infamous troll. I'm ruined here.--Yolgnu (talk) 08:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Roslavet.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Roslavet.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alexei Grischenko for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexei Grischenko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexei Grischenko until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 21:26, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aleksandr Andreyevich Samokhvalov[edit]

The article Aleksandr Andreyevich Samokhvalov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unproven notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. XXN, 15:06, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:CroatianCult.jpg[edit]

The file File:CroatianCult.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]