User talk:Bine Mai: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:57, 12 September 2010


Home	Talk	Guestbook	Awards	Contributions	Userboxes	Templates

Archives

1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12

Proposed deletion of Olympia Tower

The article Olympia Tower has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apparently non - notable plans for a building WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Polargeo (talk) 13:56, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oilfield infobox

Hi, Bine Mai, and welcome back! You created a number of oil and gas fields articles. As the oilfield infobox template is updated and modified, please use the modified code instead on the old code. For the updated blank template and usage guidelines, please see Template:Infobox oil field. Beagel (talk) 14:04, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletions

Hello, Bine Mai. The following Proposed Deletions are some of a series of PROD templates which were placed by User:Vegaswikian on articles you created this past week. As a courtesy, I have added these to your talk page in case you might wish to address the notability concerns prior to the scheduled deletion on August 31. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 18:33, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Politehnica Office Tower

The article Politehnica Office Tower has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Piraeus Bank Tower Bucharest

The article Piraeus Bank Tower Bucharest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Prime Towers Bucharest

The article Prime Towers Bucharest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Pipera Business Tower

The article Pipera Business Tower has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Monaco Towers

The article Monaco Towers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Monte Carlo Palace

The article Monte Carlo Palace has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

DYK nomination of Rice production in Romania

Hello! Your submission of Rice production in Romania at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Smartse (talk) 14:18, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've commented again. Smartse (talk) 09:49, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Romgaz

On 31 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Romgaz, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:02, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sam Mills (company)

On 3 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sam Mills (company), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:05, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK Arad–Szeged pipeline

Please see my comments at Template talk:Did you know.4meter4 (talk) 17:31, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Arad–Szeged pipeline

On 6 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Arad–Szeged pipeline, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Cirt (talk) 06:12, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK query regarding Clyde Refinery

Hello! Your submission of Clyde Refinery at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Smartse (talk) 16:25, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cervia gas field

Hello there, and thank you for getting in touch via my talk page. My concern was that perhaps, with only a single source, the subject of your article might have been so 'new' that it had yet to receive sufficient significant coverage to pass WP:GNG bullet point 1. It wasn't so much a criticism as a call for additional referencing so that its notability was assured. Feel free to remove the tag if you disagree, or perhaps swap it for {{Refimprove}}. I hope this helps - please drop me another message if I can provide further information. Best wishes, CountdownCrispy ^{☎ ✎} 13:06, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rice production in Romania

On 8 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rice production in Romania, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Electrica

On 10 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Electrica, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rin Grand Hotel

On 11 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rin Grand Hotel, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:19, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dobrogea Wind Farm

Hi, Bine Mai. There is a merger discussion of Dobrogea Wind Farm and Fântânele Wind Farm articles. Your opinion is appreciated. Beagel (talk) 11:39, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates

Hi. Please refrain from adding fake coordinates as you did here. They will not only be considered vandalism, but also be very difficult to detect. Assuming that it was unintentional, it is always best practice to confirm the coordinates (by clicking on them) after you add them. Kind regards. Rehman⁽⁺⁾ 13:30, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello! I invite you to contribute on Romanian Wikipedia, we have 150,000 pages now.Ionutzmovie (talk) 19:25, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In response to Oil shale in Serbia

It's a good article, but does the oil shale have an exact name? JeremyMcClean (Talk) 20:52, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bine Mai. You have new messages at JeremyMcClean's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Revision as of 20:52, 12 September 2010 edit JeremyMcClean (talk \| contribs) 413 edits →‎In response to Oil shale in Serbia: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:57, 12 September 2010 edit undo JeremyMcClean (talk \| contribs) 413 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 173:		Line 173:

	It's a good article, but does the oil shale have an exact name? <font color="red">Jeremy</font><font color="blue"><b>McClean</b></font> ([[User Talk:JeremyMcClean\|Talk]]) 20:52, 12 September 2010 (UTC)		It's a good article, but does the oil shale have an exact name? <font color="red">Jeremy</font><font color="blue"><b>McClean</b></font> ([[User Talk:JeremyMcClean\|Talk]]) 20:52, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

			{{talkback\|JeremyMcClean}}