User talk:कप्तान1

Welcome[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.--VViking_TalkEdits 14:17, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, कप्तान1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes. You may have problems writing in English, though. Did you know there are Wikipedias in over 300 languages? You may like to help at a Wikipedia in your language instead. Anyway, welcome to the project, and if you need help, you can visit the Teahouse. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:17, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hi, कप्तान1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question.

However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is in a non-Latin alphabet script it may not display correctly for many other users. Although usernames like yours are not prohibited, Wikipedia's signature guideline and username policy encourage you, as a courtesy to other users, to alter your signature so that it also includes a transliteration of your username using Latin characters, so others can see it correctly. For the how-to of tailoring your username, please see WP:CUSTOMSIG.

For a translation of the above message, please click the link below that matches your primary language.

Thanks, and feel free to message me about anything. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:18, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDICSCRIPTS[edit]

Please read the policy link above before you make any further edits. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:19, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Muhammad Ali Jinnah. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Idell (talk) 15:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Narendra Modi Stadium, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kannauj, Kumaon Regiment and Line of Actual Control you may be blocked from editing.
It was clearly explained that you should not add Indic script to our articles , above, but you have repeatedly done so - Arjayay (talk) 15:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)}} - Arjayay (talk) 15:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Raisina Dialogue.
Despite repeated warnings, you are still adding Indic script to our articles. Please stop before you are blocked - Arjayay (talk) 15:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, असंलिव[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, असंलिव. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – International Alphabet of Sanskrit Transliteration. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at International Alphabet of Sanskrit Transliteration. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fram (talk) 14:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chanakyapuri, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Despite repeated warnings you are still adding Indic script to our articles - please stop - Arjayay (talk)

March 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:59, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Script[edit]

we should add indian script to all english articles related to Indian and Indosphere. कप्तान1 (talk) 15:09, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No the consensus is as per WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Arjayay (talk) 15:35, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indic script[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chanakyapuri.
You were previously blocked for adding Indic script, contrary to WP:NOINDICSCRIPT but have resumed doing so - please stop before you are blocked again - Arjayay (talk) 15:35, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. - Arjayay (talk) 12:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gilgit. - Arjayay (talk) 12:00, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

According to UN resolution 47 The whole region of Kashmir is disputed so I added this in article's Description. What's wrong in This ??? कप्तान1 (talk) 12:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently actively rejecting community concerns voiced here on this page by introducing indic scripts into the lead section of articles; competence concerns regarding Special:Diff/1018465310.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am just adding ISO 15919 to the articles with support of dēvanāgarī script , that script is understandable by more than 80 % of the indian population and more than 1 billion people worldwide. that's the reason why I am adding ISO 15919 with support of Dēvanāgarī script. कप्तान1 (talk) 10:44, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

कप्तान1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am just adding ISO 15919 to the articles related to india or indosphere with the support of Dēvanāgarī script. Dēvanāgarī script is understandable by more than 80 % of india's population and more than 1 billion people worldwide. that's the only reason why i am adding ISO 15919 with support of Dēvanāgarī script

Decline reason:

Yes, that's why you were blocked. You knew perfectly well you shouldn't be doing that, you were warned about this repeatedly in February and in March and in April. Yamla (talk) 11:14, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock}} कप्तान1 (talk) 11:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

कप्तान1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

should i stop adding Dēvanāgarī script or stop adding both script (Dēvanāgarī and ISO 15919) in the indic articles. कप्तान1 (talk) 11:18, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, you should stop adding both scripts in articles. This has been explained to you several times now. PhilKnight (talk) 18:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

~~You could start reading the content of this page to find repeated answers to your question. I'll protect the page for a week to encourage reading.~~ ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:19, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that was an unnecessary additional measure, and this specific question had not explicitly been answered. The concerns and the block are about the persistent addition of Indic scripts to India-related articles, not about ISO 15919 transliterations. See Special:Diff/1018325356 for an example edit by Arjayay, who has attempted to explain the concerns to you before. MOS:INDICSCRIPT contains the following additional advice: "use International Phonetic Alphabet pronunciation guides, which are more international", so I recommend stopping to add both.

The current two unblock requests are phrased as questions. If you have questions about the block, feel free to ask them as normal text. You can use the following code to notify me about the question: {{ping|ToBeFree}} ~~~~

When blocking, I was additionally concerned about Special:Diff/1018092447/1018465359, but I think I can understand what has happened there. Wikipedia is a tertiary source that summarizes what other sources say. We take care to fairly represent all significant viewpoints, and you seem to have removed a significant viewpoint. The article describes various usages of the symbol, and – no matter if we like it – the symbol has been prominently used by Nazis. If I correctly understand the situation, your replacement was caused by cultural differences, as described in the article: To you, either the symbol has nothing to do with Nazism, or you dislike this context. Could you agree not to make similar changes in the future?

Thank you very much in advance and best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:39, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree , ISO 15919 perfectly shows Dēvanāgarī transliteration that's why I was used the ISO and Dēv.: कप्तान1 (talk) 15:48, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries about that. Would you agree not to add Dēvanāgarī to English Wikipedia articles again? It would also be helpful if you could explain why you have done so after many warnings and a block. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree, Okay I will not add: कप्तान1 (talk) 15:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're currently using the code {{ping|ToBeFree, message}} ~~~~, but this does not work. Please try to use {{ping|ToBeFree}} message ~~~~ instead.

Thank you for agreeing not to add Dēvanāgarī to English Wikipedia articles again. Why did you do so after multiple warnings and a block before? How has the situation changed? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:03, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree:I will not add no more scripts. कप्तान1 (talk) 16:04, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

कप्तान1, we're having communication issues. Perhaps it's my fault, but: Communication issues led to the block. There are still communication issues. I can thus not unblock you. Another administrator will have a look at your request, but this may take some time. In the meantime, please try to answer the questions. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: Unblock me , I will not di it again , bro कप्तान1 (talk) 16:30, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, it's not my fault. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:32, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS decline

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. ( Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you for your attention to these matters.

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:27, 19 April 2021 (UTC) "I will not do it again and I just want to translate pages from English to Hindi"[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

कप्तान1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not do it again and I just want to translate pages from English to Hindi

Decline reason:

I'm afraid this is a lost cause on your part. One more request like this and you will lose talk page access. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:22, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

कप्तान1 (talk) 07:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the correct website for translating pages from English to Hindi. Feel free to translate English Wikipedia articles to any other Wikipedia, but you can't do so on the English Wikipedia. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:48, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree:unblock me कप्तान1 (talk) 00:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: I will not do it again, unblock me.... कप्तान1 (talk) 02:16, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree:Unblock me , I will not do it again . if i do it again then you can bolvk me.. कप्तान1 (talk) 03:10, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: please unblock me. I will not do it agian. कप्तान1 (talk) 09:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

STOP IT. If you wish to be unblocked, make a request. WP:GAB explains how. Pinging someone over and over and over again shows you are being deliberately disruptive and you will lose talk page access if you keep doing this. Don't ping anyone else. Make an unblock request or keep quiet. --Yamla (talk) 10:37, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restored TPA[edit]

per UTRS appeal #42638 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:56, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will you unblock me or not, because I will not say anymore. कप्तान1 (talk) 12:59, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not until you make a compelling unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 13:03, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

what does it mean ??? कप्तान1 (talk) 13:04, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GAB explains how to make an unblock request. You need to address the reasons for your block, which include persistently actively rejecting community concerns by introducing indic scripts into the lead section of articles and competence concerns. You'll need to convince the reviewing admin that you are indeed competent to edit here, will not disrupt Wikipedia any further, and will adhere to community consensus. --Yamla (talk) 13:37, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@कप्तान1: I restored talk page access because I thought you could make a successful unblock request. Please follow the instructions you already have been given by filling out an unblock request in the usual manner. You have agreed not to add Indic script. Pease describe what constructive edits you would make. --Deepfriedokra (talk)

I can add ISO 15919 to the articles related to Indic religions and history of India to better differentiate between all consonants of Indic languages. कप्तान1 (talk) 15:57, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that does nothing to build the encyclopedia. Indeed, that's why you were blocked. That is what you have said you would not do anymore. You have not told us how you would constructively edit. The last time was at UTRS. I will therefore remove talk page access. That was your fourth UTRS. I will give you six months to contemplate how you would help build Wikipedia. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:16, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deepfriedokra, I'm not sure if TPA was ever technically revoked; the only thing I did once is ECP'ing this page. I wouldn't object to TPA revocation though... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:07, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: I thought something looked off. Fixed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:48, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]