Jump to content

User talk:165.234.100.114

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bainville, Montana, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  —SMALLJIM  21:54, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2008

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Magic:The Gathering. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TheRedPenOfDoom (talk) 00:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Greenville, Maine has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Thingg⊕⊗ 21:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Greenville, Maine‎. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 20:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Greenville, Maine. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Vishnava talk 22:03, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to User:Geniac‎. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --Geniac (talk) 16:29, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Daniel Powter has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Katanada (talk) 00:02, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

165.234.100.114 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is the internet address for a public library. 165.234.100.114 (talk) 17:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no compelling reason to unblock. I suggest you make an account at home, or request that someone make an account for you. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 18:36, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

165.234.100.114 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a static IP corresponding to a particular library. It has a history of minimal disruption in the past decade. (See contributions.) It was caught in a year-long /19 rangeblock; the vandal edits were all within a narrower range, 165.234.101.0/24. It's true that I personally have other ways of editing Wikipedia, but that doesn't help anyone else here or on the rest of the /19 range who is affected by this block. 165.234.100.114 (talk) 21:33, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem to know a lot about this compared to most people. Users should create accounts elsewhere or request one through WP:ACC, and then if they are affected by this block they may request unblock. 331dot (talk) 22:28, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You may make another unblock request for a different administrator to review; there is no need in my opinion to bring this to AN. If a different administrator feels differently, they may do that or remove the block. 331dot (talk) 19:38, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

165.234.100.114 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Accept reason:

This year-long block is about a month short of expiring; easy enough to block again (perhaps more selectively) if more problems arise. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 00:28, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

165.234.100.114 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Decline reason:

The block was reimposed last December. That suggests there is good reason for it. Again, please obtain an account to edit without this sort of issue. 331dot (talk) 14:31, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

165.234.100.114 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The /23 block expired this past December, but a new yearlong /16 block was imposed in February. This is still a static library IP with no recent history of disruption. 165.234.100.114 (talk) 19:26, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Declined, for the same reasons the other requests were declined. Yamla (talk) 22:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:165.234.100.114&oldid=1189624840"