User talk:1TWO3Writer/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sugaru Miaki (April 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 23:43, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 1TWO3Writer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 23:43, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akinari Matsuno has been accepted[edit]

Akinari Matsuno, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

--TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 07:59, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sugaru Miaki (July 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheImaCow was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
--TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 08:52, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hiroshi Yamamoto (writer)[edit]

Hello, 1TWO3Writer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hiroshi Yamamoto".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sugaru Miaki[edit]

Hello, 1TWO3Writer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sugaru Miaki".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:21, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why delete Stockton rush edit?[edit]

He made a choice against all advice and safety regulations. His negligence resulted in the deaths of others. That is manslaughter at the very least.

It is a fact that he refused to meet certification guidelines, ignored several warning from experts and did not do the necessary stress tests against the hull. Any effort to research would have reinforced the concerns others presented.

Neutral admits to the good and bad. 2001:48F8:2D:FC5:B376:6B26:2D6E:8288 (talk) 17:24, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I appreciate you reaching out to me. Wikipedia is not about determining guilt of someone involved in an incident, this would fall under violating WP:NPOV. If the relevant administrative bodies find Stockton guilty of manslaughter, then the edit would no longer be an opinion but something that can be referenced and included in his article. Any opinions not referenced by an outside reliable source may get Wikimedia into legal trouble, so it is best to stay neutral when possible.
Thanks, 1TWO3Writer (talk) 17:33, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hajime Kanzaka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dragon Magazine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:09:48, 28 June 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by LegalizeAnythingMuppets[edit]



LegalizeAnythingMuppets (talk) 22:09, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Study invitation for RC patrollers[edit]

Hi @1TWO3Writer, thanks for patrolling edits and reverting vandalism! I wonder if you are interested in our ongoing study for patrollers. The study aims to evaluate AI models that power recent change filters, Huggle, SWViewer, and many other anti-vandal tools. Your feedback can be really helpful! If you're interested, please check out our recruitment page for more information. Thank you for your consideration! Tzusheng (talk) 00:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @1TWO3Writer, thanks again for your consideration! I just sent you an email for scheduling. Talk to you soon! Tzusheng (talk) 00:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My Supermansion edit.[edit]

Does a tweet count as a source? https://twitter.com/SuperMansiontv/status/1455202979204648963

Because if it doesn't, the only source I do have requires an amazon prime account. 24.46.178.54 (talk) 02:06, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @24.46.178.54, Freevee seems to be a service owned by Amazon that streams television shows for Amazon Prime users. So perhaps adding the line and citation will be redundant. 1TWO3Writer (talk) 07:04, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol needs your help![edit]

New pages awaiting review as of June 30th, 2023.

Hello 1TWO3Writer,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted[edit]

Hi 1TWO3Writer. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. – Joe (talk) 11:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 3 July 2023[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Idyll XXV[edit]

The source in question is The Greek Bucolic Poets by J. M. Edmonds, which was first published in the US in 1912 and is thus in the public domain. The source is attributed in the article. Please remove the speedy deletion request. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 19:10, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, it was reverted. 1TWO3Writer (talk) 1TWO3Writer (talk) 19:12, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging pages for speedy deletion[edit]

Hello, 1TWO3Writer,

Please look at the page history of a page before you tag it for deletion. If an administrator or senior editor has already removed a similar CSD tag from the page, they probably had a good reason to do this and you should look for a different reason. Earlier today, a sockpuppet tagged some pages for speedy deletion, the tags were removed by an admin and then you replaced them. I believe you moved at least one to Draft space and that is a better solution than retagging them. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 19:39, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz,
Apologies for that mistake, won't happen again.
1TWO3Writer (talk) 19:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spam[edit]

Maybe you read the instructions to be nice to new editors. Thank you. But we don't need to go to extra lengths to help an editor who contributes something that contains both spam and copyvio. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert,
I see. Thank you for the advice. 1TWO3Writer (talk) 22:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Workforce[edit]

I apologize if you feel my edit was not neutral. That is how I feel about the majority of what I read on Wikipedia. Let me give you one quick example of the lack of context, and subsequent mis and disinformation being propagated: I read that Trump is the only president to leave office with fewer people in the workforce than when he entered office, the first president to do so. I'm curious as to whether you realize why that is, and why that is highly misleading? This is one of hundreds of "neutral" examples I have seen on Wikipedia, a large portion being easily disproven. 2601:202:8180:2020:3098:8E7F:560B:6B00 (talk) 22:26, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Go back to that information and read the sources that justify that content. Editors must not add their own opinions. All content is based on what reliable sources (RS) say. Your opinions do not trump those sources. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 23:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mikhail Fedorovich von Schultz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luga.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Craig Anderson (actor)[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Craig Anderson (actor), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deviation from Style[edit]

I'm not sure what you're referring to. I'd love to know so I don't do it again. Could you please explain what you mean. Ta! Whitemancanjump23 (talk) 06:37, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted[edit]

Hi 1TWO3Writer. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 22:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 July 2023[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:00, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Haritha (Girl's wing of MSF)[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Haritha (Girl's wing of MSF), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:51, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Antoine Hamilton[edit]

Dear 1TWO3Writer. Greetings, I see you are a precious resource as you can translate between English and Japanese. Not many of those.

I sincerely thank you for your corrections to the article Antoine Hamilton, to whom you came perhaps because of your interest in light literature. Most of your corrections are head-on and very appreciated. I sometimes mix up my English and my French, which are both 2nd language.

I wonder, however, whether it was a good idea to throw out the spaces before the invisible comments ( <!-- ). I think some Wikipedians recommend to do so, but I feel these spaces strongly enhance the readability of the code. MOS:COMMENT, which I think is pertinent here, prescribes "Check that your invisible comment does not change the formatting, for example by introducing unwanted white space in the rendered page", but the MOS does not forbid separating end-of-line comments from the code by a space as I habitually do. I have not seen any unwanted whitespace added by these spaces before comments. This is important to me because I use these comments in this way in the "list-defined references" citation style, which I recently adopted.

I very much would like to hear your point of view. With many thanks and best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 10:43, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Johannes Schade Thanks for reaching out.
This page says that whitespace should be avoided in-regards to comments as the space between the comment and wikitext is rendered. I added a comment to this message to illustrate this. However, feel free to revert those edits if you want, as it is ultimately inconsequential imo. Just know that AWB, the software I used on your page, automatically deletes "unnecessary" whitespace when used, so if you want to stop it from happening in the future, add a comment stating you want that space to be kept. Something like:
<!--PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE WHITESPACE BETWEEN COMMENT AND TEXT; READABILITY-->
That way adjustments can be made when said program is used.
Sorry for the trouble! 123Writer talk 12:57, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dear 123Writer. Thank you for your prompt and careful reply. Thanks also for your in-text example. Do you in fact see an extra whitespace between the "rendered." and the "I added "? I do not. Perhaps this depends on the browser? I use Google Chrome.
I looked up Help:Whitespace#Invisible comments. Indeed, this tells editors to avoid spaces before the <!-- in end-of-line comments. However, I think Help texts are meant to guide editors when writing and I believe they cannot be used to justify correcting somebody else's text additions. You would however have a good reason to remove the space if you saw an extra whitespace caused by the space that you deleted.
As you certainly know, you are responsible for whatever you do with AWB, even if your edits are part of AWB's General Fixes. As WP:AWB/General fixes says, the General Fixes are intended to be unproblematic, but in fact there are special cases when some of them create havoc. I always untick "Apply general fixes" when running AWB.
Another case is your correction from "[Nenagh Castle]]" to "[[Nenagh Castle]]"; "[Nenagh Castle]" was intended. This is inside a quotation and the "[Nenagh Castle]" should have been a gloss explaining the "it" used in the quote, not a wkilink. MOS:LINK prescribes "Be conservative when linking within quotations". I suspect this also was done by General Fixes. Shows how careful you have to be.
Another frequent problem with General Fixes is that it "corrects" date formats inside quotations, but this did luckily not happen in the case discussed here.
I am going to re-establish the spaces. With best regards and thanks, Johannes Schade (talk) 10:17, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Thank you for this substantial article on a well received book. I hope you continue to write others like it. Happy editing!

Schminnte (talk • contribs) 21:37, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Being You: A New Science of Consciousness[edit]

The article Being You: A New Science of Consciousness you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Being You: A New Science of Consciousness for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SpaceEconomist192 -- SpaceEconomist192 (talk) 21:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Being You: A New Science of Consciousness[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Being You: A New Science of Consciousness you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SpaceEconomist192 -- SpaceEconomist192 (talk) 20:42, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Albion[edit]

Very many thanks for finding citations for the substantial uncited section in the Royal Albion Hotel article. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 20:19, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Always happy to help. :) 123Writer talk 20:21, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 August 2023[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:37, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 August 2023[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wet Woman in the Wind[edit]

Hi 1TWO3Writer, I hope you're doing well. I am trying to explore and learn new languages, so would like to know your views on my new creation. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 10:43, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@C1K98V Did some fixes. I haven't watched the film so I won't be able to write a plot synopsis, however some of the English reviews seem to at least detail a bit about the film's plot. 123Writer talk 11:43, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@1TWO3Writer Thanks for the quick look up. I have added the reception section from Yuki Mamiya article, but Earwig detected 40% Copyvio. So, I'm requesting a revdel for the same. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 11:55, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Being You: A New Science of Consciousness[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Being You: A New Science of Consciousness you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, a human here. Unlike the last reviewer, I'm happy to work with you on this one: you'll see from my comments that I think a fair amount of work is needed, but I'll do whatever I can to help. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:19, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 August 2023[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Opened Ground: Poems 1966–1996[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Opened Ground: Poems 1966–1996 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 13:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit request[edit]

@1TWO3Writer Hello there, I've seen you have done copyediting for a few articles, and i was wondering if you can do one for my article, Wii U GamePad. I've been improving the article for awhile now, and now i wanna get it copyedited for GA status. Thank you. Summerslam2022 (talk) 21:51, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! Will start it tomorrow. 123Writer talk 20:30, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Saiyuki (manga)[edit]

Hi @1TWO3Writer: I'm so sorry if i disturb you, But can you copy edit this article? I listed the article at WP:GOCE/REQ for copyediting on July 1, But so far no one has taken it. The article is in need of very in-depth copyediting. Thanks a lot. M.A.LasTroniN910t@lk 20:13, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After Summer's request, I'll take a look. 123Writer talk 20:31, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in the August 2023 GAN backlog drive[edit]

The Multiple Good Article Reviewer's Barnstar
We really appreciate that you reviewed a large number of GANs during the drive. Due in part to your efforts, the backlog of unreviewed nominations was reduced by 440 articles, an astonishing 69 percent.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:13, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 58[edit]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 58, July – August 2023

  • New partners - De Standaard and Duncker & Humblot
  • Tech tip: Filters
  • Wikimania presentation

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 September 2023[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:35, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Being You: A New Science of Consciousness[edit]

The article Being You: A New Science of Consciousness you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Being You: A New Science of Consciousness for comments about the article, and Talk:Being You: A New Science of Consciousness/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:02, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol newsletter[edit]

Hello 1TWO3Writer,

New Page Review article queue, March to September 2023

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 3 October 2023[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:29, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023 GOCE drive award[edit]

The Modest Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to 1TWO3Writer for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2023 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 09:55, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Opened Ground: Poems 1966–1996[edit]

The article Opened Ground: Poems 1966–1996 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Opened Ground: Poems 1966–1996 and Talk:Opened Ground: Poems 1966–1996/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 21:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 October 2023[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:59, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November Articles for creation backlog drive[edit]

Hello 1TWO3Writer:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 3000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 November 2023[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:42, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 November 2023[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Opened Ground: Poems 1966–1996[edit]

The article Opened Ground: Poems 1966–1996 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Opened Ground: Poems 1966–1996 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 10:01, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 59[edit]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 59, September – October 2023

  • Spotlight: Introducing a repository of anti-disinformation projects
  • Tech tip: Library access methods

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:16, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 December 2023[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:07, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:09, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 December 2023[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:56, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 January 2024[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 60[edit]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 60, November – December 2023

  • Three new partners
  • Google Scholar integration
  • How to track partner suggestions

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 January 2024[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 February 2024[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 2 March 2024[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 61[edit]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 61, January – February 2024

  • Bristol University Press and British Online Archives now available
  • 1Lib1Ref results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 March 2024[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:1TWO3Writer/Archive_1&oldid=1224241819"